BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2022-48800High confidence

mm: vmscan: remove deadlock due to throttling failing to make progress

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-53679

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: vmscan: remove deadlock due to throttling failing to make progress A soft lockup bug in kcompactd was reported in a private bugzilla with the following visible in dmesg; watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 26s! [kcompactd0:479] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 52s! [kcompactd0:479] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 78s! [kcompactd0:479] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 104s! [kcompactd0:479] The machine had 256G of RAM with no swap and an earlier failed allocation indicated that node 0 where kcompactd was run was potentially unreclaimable; Node 0 active_anon:29355112kB inactive_anon:2913528kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:64kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB mapped:8kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB shmem:26780kB shmem_thp: 0kB shmem_pmdmapped: 0kB anon_thp: 23480320kB writeback_tmp:0kB kernel_stack:2272kB pagetables:24500kB all_unreclaimable? yes Vlastimil Babka investigated a crash dump and found that a task migrating pages was trying to drain PCP lists; PID: 52922 TASK: ffff969f820e5000 CPU: 19 COMMAND: "kworker/u128:3" Call Trace: __schedule schedule schedule_timeout wait_for_completion __flush_work __drain_all_pages __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.114 __alloc_pages alloc_migration_target migrate_pages migrate_to_node do_migrate_pages cpuset_migrate_mm_workfn process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork This failure is specific to CONFIG_PREEMPT=n builds. The root of the problem is that kcompact0 is not rescheduling on a CPU while a task that has isolated a large number of the pages from the LRU is waiting on kcompact0 to reschedule so the pages can be released. While shrink_inactive_list() only loops once around too_many_isolated, reclaim can continue without rescheduling if sc->skipped_deactivate == 1 which could happen if there was no file LRU and the inactive anon list was not low.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: vmscan: remove deadlock due to throttling failing to make progress A soft lockup bug in kcompactd was reported in a private bugzilla with the following visible in dmesg; watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 26s! [kcompactd0:479] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 52s! [kcompactd0:479] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 78s! [kcompactd0:479] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 104s! [kcompactd0:479] The machine had 256G of RAM with no swap and an earlier failed allocation indicated that node 0 where kcompactd was run was potentially unreclaimable; Node 0 active_anon:29355112kB inactive_anon:2913528kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:64kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB mapped:8kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB shmem:26780kB shmem_thp: 0kB shmem_pmdmapped: 0kB anon_thp: 23480320kB writeback_tmp:0kB kernel_stack:2272kB pagetables:24500kB all_unreclaimable? yes Vlastimil Babka investigated a crash dump and found that a task migrating pages was trying to drain PCP lists; PID: 52922 TASK: ffff969f820e5000 CPU: 19 COMMAND: "kworker/u128:3" Call Trace: __schedule schedule schedule_timeout wait_for_completion __flush_work __drain_all_pages __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.114 __alloc_pages alloc_migration_target migrate_pages migrate_to_node do_migrate_pages cpuset_migrate_mm_workfn process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork This failure is specific to CONFIG_PREEMPT=n builds. The root of the problem is that kcompact0 is not rescheduling on a CPU while a task that has isolated a large number of the pages from the LRU is waiting on kcompact0 to reschedule so the pages can be released. While shrink_inactive_list() only loops once around too_many_isolated, reclaim can continue without rescheduling if sc->skipped_deactivate == 1 which could happen if there was no file LRU and the inactive anon list was not low.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: vmscan: remove deadlock due to throttling failing to make progress A soft lockup bug in kcompactd was reported in a private bugzilla with the following visible in dmesg; watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 26s! [kcompactd0:479] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 52s! [kcompactd0:479] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 78s! [kcompactd0:479] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#33 stuck for 104s! [kcompactd0:479] The machine had 256G of RAM with no swap and an earlier failed allocation indicated that node 0 where kcompactd was run was potentially unreclaimable; Node 0 active_anon:29355112kB inactive_anon:2913528kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:64kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB mapped:8kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB shmem:26780kB shmem_thp: 0kB shmem_pmdmapped: 0kB anon_thp: 23480320kB writeback_tmp:0kB kernel_stack:2272kB pagetables:24500kB all_unreclaimable? yes Vlastimil Babka investigated a crash dump and found that a task migrating pages was trying to drain PCP lists; PID: 52922 TASK: ffff969f820e5000 CPU: 19 COMMAND: "kworker/u128:3" Call Trace: __schedule schedule schedule_timeout wait_for_completion __flush_work __drain_all_pages __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.114 __alloc_pages alloc_migration_target migrate_pages migrate_to_node do_migrate_pages cpuset_migrate_mm_workfn process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork This failure is specific to CONFIG_PREEMPT=n builds. The root of the problem is that kcompact0 is not rescheduling on a CPU while a task that has isolated a large number of the pages from the LRU is waiting on kcompact0 to reschedule so the pages can be released. While shrink_inactive_list() only loops once around too_many_isolated, reclaim can continue without rescheduling if sc->skipped_deactivate == 1 which could happen if there was no file LRU and the inactive anon list was not low.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2024-1625Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-48783 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48784 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48785 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48786 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48800 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48801 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48798 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48800 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48801 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48803 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48805 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48807 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48798 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48800 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48801 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48803 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48805 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48807 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
d818fca1cac31b1fc9301bda83e195a46fb4ebaa < 3980cff6349687f73d5109f156f23cb261c24164; d818fca1cac31b1fc9301bda83e195a46fb4ebaa < b485c6f1f9f54b81443efda5f3d8a5036ba2cd91; 5.16
Fixed
< 5.16; 5.16.10 ≤ 5.16.*; 5.17 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Jul 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 18:47 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-53679
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-48800 · cve.blacktree.nl