BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2022-48757High confidence

net: fix information leakage in /proc/net/ptype

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.22% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.16.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.16.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.16.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.16.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-53636

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix information leakage in /proc/net/ptype In one net namespace, after creating a packet socket without binding it to a device, users in other net namespaces can observe the new `packet_type` added by this packet socket by reading `/proc/net/ptype` file. This is minor information leakage as packet socket is namespace aware. Add a net pointer in `packet_type` to keep the net namespace of of corresponding packet socket. In `ptype_seq_show`, this net pointer must be checked when it is not NULL.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix information leakage in /proc/net/ptype In one net namespace, after creating a packet socket without binding it to a device, users in other net namespaces can observe the new `packet_type` added by this packet socket by reading `/proc/net/ptype` file. This is minor information leakage as packet socket is namespace aware. Add a net pointer in `packet_type` to keep the net namespace of of corresponding packet socket. In `ptype_seq_show`, this net pointer must be checked when it is not NULL.

Why

The product exposes a resource to the wrong control sphere, providing unintended actors with inappropriate access to the resource.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix information leakage in /proc/net/ptype In one net namespace, after creating a packet socket without binding it to a device, users in other net namespaces can observe the new `packet_type` added by this packet socket by reading `/proc/net/ptype` file. This is minor information leakage as packet socket is namespace aware. Add a net pointer in `packet_type` to keep the net namespace of of corresponding packet socket. In `ptype_seq_show`, this net pointer must be checked when it is not NULL.

Why

The product exposes a resource to the wrong control sphere, providing unintended actors with inappropriate access to the resource.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-668 ↗

CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere. The product exposes a resource to the wrong control sphere, providing unintended actors with inappropriate access to the resource.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-668
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1913Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien und Daten zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1422Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240626Security Bulletin 26 Jun 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 26 Jun 2024, published on 26 June 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2022-41881 Référence CVE CVE-2022-45688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45688 Référence CVE CVE-2022-45787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-46337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-46337 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48619 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48743 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48747 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48754 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48760 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1370 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22946 Référence CVE CVE-2023-24998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-48724 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48725 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48727 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48728 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48729 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48732 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48745 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48746 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48752 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48760 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48763 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48767 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48768 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48769 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48770 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0072Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Secure Analytics

d?id=CVE-2021-47461 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47579 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48743 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48747 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28746 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4692 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4693 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52451 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52451 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52463 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52469 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52471 Gestion détaillée du document le 27 janvier 2025 Version initiale

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2022-25762 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29885 Référence CVE CVE-2022-31030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31030 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34305 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42252 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48743 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48747 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286 Référence CVE CVE-2023-20584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20584 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2253 Référence CVE CVE-2023-23931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23931 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25153 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25173 Référence CVE CVE-2023-27043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27043 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0668Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2021-47468 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47579 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48637 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48743 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48747 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28746 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52451 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52451 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52458 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52463 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52469 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52471 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-026259Linux の Linux Kernel における誤った領域へのリソースの漏えいに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、誤った領域へのリソースの漏えいに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 2feb27dbe00cbb4f7d31f90acf6bd0d751dd0a50 < 8f88c78d24f6f346919007cd459fd7e51a8c7779, 2feb27dbe00cbb4f7d31f90acf6bd0d751dd0a50 < be1ca30331c7923c6f376610c1bd6059be9b1908, 2feb27dbe00cbb4f7d31f90acf6bd0d751dd0a50 < c38023032a598ec6263e008d62c7f02def72d5c7, 2feb27dbe00cbb4f7d31f90acf6bd0d751dd0a50 < b67ad6170c0ea87391bb253f35d1f78857736e54, 2feb27dbe00cbb4f7d31f90acf6bd0d751dd0a50 < e372ecd455b6ebc7720f52bf4b5f5d44d02f2092, 2feb27dbe00cbb4f7d31f90acf6bd0d751dd0a50 < db044d97460ea792110eb8b971e82569ded536c6, 2feb27dbe00cbb4f7d31f90acf6bd0d751dd0a50 < e43669c77cb3a742b7d84ecdc7c68c4167a7709b, 2feb27dbe00cbb4f7d31f90acf6bd0d751dd0a50 < 839ec7039513a4f84bfbaff953a9393471176bee, 2feb27dbe00cbb4f7d31f90acf6bd0d751dd0a50 < 47934e06b65637c88a762d9c98329ae6e3238888, 2.6.26
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.26, 4.4.302 ≤ 4.4.*, 4.9.300 ≤ 4.9.*, 4.14.265 ≤ 4.14.*, 4.19.228 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.176 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.96 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.19 ≤ 5.15.*, 5.16.5 ≤ 5.16.*, 5.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 20 Jun 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 18:46 UTC · CWE-668 · Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-53636
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-48757 · cve.blacktree.nl