BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2022-48687High confidence

ipv6: sr: fix out-of-bounds read when setting HMAC data.

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.19.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-53566

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: sr: fix out-of-bounds read when setting HMAC data. The SRv6 layer allows defining HMAC data that can later be used to sign IPv6 Segment Routing Headers. This configuration is realised via netlink through four attributes: SEG6_ATTR_HMACKEYID, SEG6_ATTR_SECRET, SEG6_ATTR_SECRETLEN and SEG6_ATTR_ALGID. Because the SECRETLEN attribute is decoupled from the actual length of the SECRET attribute, it is possible to provide invalid combinations (e.g., secret = "", secretlen = 64). This case is not checked in the code and with an appropriately crafted netlink message, an out-of-bounds read of up to 64 bytes (max secret length) can occur past the skb end pointer and into skb_shared_info: Breakpoint 1, seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=<optimized out>, info=<optimized out>) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208 208 memcpy(hinfo->secret, secret, slen); (gdb) bt #0 seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=<optimized out>, info=<optimized out>) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208 #1 0xffffffff81e012e9 in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=nlh@entry=0xffff88800b1b7600, extack=extack@entry=0xffffc90000ba7af0, ops=ops@entry=0xffffc90000ba7a80, hdrlen=4, net=0xffffffff84237580 <init_net>, family=<optimized out>, family=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:731 #2 0xffffffff81e01435 in genl_family_rcv_msg (extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, family=0xffffffff82fef6c0 <seg6_genl_family>) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 #3 genl_rcv_msg (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:792 #4 0xffffffff81dfffc3 in netlink_rcv_skb (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, cb=cb@entry=0xffffffff81e01350 <genl_rcv_msg>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2501 #5 0xffffffff81e00919 in genl_rcv (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:803 #6 0xffffffff81dff6ae in netlink_unicast_kernel (ssk=0xffff888010eec800, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, sk=0xffff888004aed000) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 #7 netlink_unicast (ssk=ssk@entry=0xffff888010eec800, skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, portid=portid@entry=0, nonblock=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 #8 0xffffffff81dff9a4 in netlink_sendmsg (sock=<optimized out>, msg=0xffffc90000ba7e48, len=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 ... (gdb) p/x ((struct sk_buff *)0xffff88800b1f9f00)->head + ((struct sk_buff *)0xffff88800b1f9f00)->end $1 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0 (gdb) p/x secret $2 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0 (gdb) p slen $3 = 64 '@' The OOB data can then be read back from userspace by dumping HMAC state. This commit fixes this by ensuring SECRETLEN cannot exceed the actual length of SECRET.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: sr: fix out-of-bounds read when setting HMAC data. The SRv6 layer allows defining HMAC data that can later be used to sign IPv6 Segment Routing Headers. This configuration is realised via netlink through four attributes: SEG6_ATTR_HMACKEYID, SEG6_ATTR_SECRET, SEG6_ATTR_SECRETLEN and SEG6_ATTR_ALGID. Because the SECRETLEN attribute is decoupled from the actual length of the SECRET attribute, it is possible to provide invalid combinations (e.g., secret = "", secretlen = 64). This case is not checked in the code and with an appropriately crafted netlink message, an out-of-bounds read of up to 64 bytes (max secret length) can occur past the skb end pointer and into skb_shared_info: Breakpoint 1, seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=<optimized out>, info=<optimized out>) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208 208 memcpy(hinfo->secret, secret, slen); (gdb) bt #0 seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=<optimized out>, info=<optimized out>) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208 #1 0xffffffff81e012e9 in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=nlh@entry=0xffff88800b1b7600, extack=extack@entry=0xffffc90000ba7af0, ops=ops@entry=0xffffc90000ba7a80, hdrlen=4, net=0xffffffff84237580 <init_net>, family=<optimized out>, family=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:731 #2 0xffffffff81e01435 in genl_family_rcv_msg (extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, family=0xffffffff82fef6c0 <seg6_genl_family>) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 #3 genl_rcv_msg (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:792 #4 0xffffffff81dfffc3 in netlink_rcv_skb (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, cb=cb@entry=0xffffffff81e01350 <genl_rcv_msg>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2501 #5 0xffffffff81e00919 in genl_rcv (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:803 #6 0xffffffff81dff6ae in netlink_unicast_kernel (ssk=0xffff888010eec800, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, sk=0xffff888004aed000) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 #7 netlink_unicast (ssk=ssk@entry=0xffff888010eec800, skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, portid=portid@entry=0, nonblock=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 #8 0xffffffff81dff9a4 in netlink_sendmsg (sock=<optimized out>, msg=0xffffc90000ba7e48, len=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 ... (gdb) p/x ((struct sk_buff *)0xffff88800b1f9f00)->head + ((struct sk_buff *)0xffff88800b1f9f00)->end $1 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0 (gdb) p/x secret $2 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0 (gdb) p slen $3 = 64 '@' The OOB data can then be read back from userspace by dumping HMAC state. This commit fixes this by ensuring SECRETLEN cannot exceed the actual length of SECRET.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: sr: fix out-of-bounds read when setting HMAC data. The SRv6 layer allows defining HMAC data that can later be used to sign IPv6 Segment Routing Headers. This configuration is realised via netlink through four attributes: SEG6_ATTR_HMACKEYID, SEG6_ATTR_SECRET, SEG6_ATTR_SECRETLEN and SEG6_ATTR_ALGID. Because the SECRETLEN attribute is decoupled from the actual length of the SECRET attribute, it is possible to provide invalid combinations (e.g., secret = "", secretlen = 64). This case is not checked in the code and with an appropriately crafted netlink message, an out-of-bounds read of up to 64 bytes (max secret length) can occur past the skb end pointer and into skb_shared_info: Breakpoint 1, seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=<optimized out>, info=<optimized out>) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208 208 memcpy(hinfo->secret, secret, slen); (gdb) bt #0 seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=<optimized out>, info=<optimized out>) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208 #1 0xffffffff81e012e9 in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=nlh@entry=0xffff88800b1b7600, extack=extack@entry=0xffffc90000ba7af0, ops=ops@entry=0xffffc90000ba7a80, hdrlen=4, net=0xffffffff84237580 <init_net>, family=<optimized out>, family=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:731 #2 0xffffffff81e01435 in genl_family_rcv_msg (extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, family=0xffffffff82fef6c0 <seg6_genl_family>) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 #3 genl_rcv_msg (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:792 #4 0xffffffff81dfffc3 in netlink_rcv_skb (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, cb=cb@entry=0xffffffff81e01350 <genl_rcv_msg>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2501 #5 0xffffffff81e00919 in genl_rcv (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:803 #6 0xffffffff81dff6ae in netlink_unicast_kernel (ssk=0xffff888010eec800, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, sk=0xffff888004aed000) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 #7 netlink_unicast (ssk=ssk@entry=0xffff888010eec800, skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, portid=portid@entry=0, nonblock=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 #8 0xffffffff81dff9a4 in netlink_sendmsg (sock=<optimized out>, msg=0xffffc90000ba7e48, len=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 ... (gdb) p/x ((struct sk_buff *)0xffff88800b1f9f00)->head + ((struct sk_buff *)0xffff88800b1f9f00)->end $1 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0 (gdb) p/x secret $2 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0 (gdb) p slen $3 = 64 '@' The OOB data can then be read back from userspace by dumping HMAC state. This commit fixes this by ensuring SECRETLEN cannot exceed the actual length of SECRET.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1025Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder um einen nicht spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240508Security Bulletin 08 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 May 2024, published on 8 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48652 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48671 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48692 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48693 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48697 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48699 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0821Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2021-47492 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47497 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47527 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47560 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47582 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47609 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48619 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48638 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48754 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48760 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52439 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52470 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0798Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

distance. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:6744 du 18 septembre 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6744 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:6745 du 18 septembre 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6745 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:6753 du 18 septembre 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6753 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47352 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47492 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27019 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48651 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48652 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48669 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48671 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48689 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48691 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48692 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48693 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0513Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48650 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48652 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48669 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48671 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48689 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48691 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48692 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48693 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0458Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2021-47217 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0487 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48619 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48626 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48650 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48667 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48668 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28746 Référence CVE CVE-2023-35827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35827 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52454 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0440Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2021-47217 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0487 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48619 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48626 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48650 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48667 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48668 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1829 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28746 Référence CVE CVE-2023-35827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35827 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0420Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48662 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48663 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48667 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48668 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48671 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48690 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48692 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48693 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48697 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-025102Linux の Linux Kernel における境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 4f4853dc1c9c1994f6f756eabdcc25374ff271d9 < dc9dbd65c803af1607484fed5da50d41dc8dd864, 4f4853dc1c9c1994f6f756eabdcc25374ff271d9 < f684c16971ed5e77dfa25a9ad25b5297e1f58eab, 4f4853dc1c9c1994f6f756eabdcc25374ff271d9 < 3df71e11a4773d775c3633c44319f7acdb89011c, 4f4853dc1c9c1994f6f756eabdcc25374ff271d9 < 076f2479fc5a15c4a970ca3b5e57d42ba09a31fa, 4f4853dc1c9c1994f6f756eabdcc25374ff271d9 < 55195563ec29f80f984237b743de0e2b6ba4d093, 4f4853dc1c9c1994f6f756eabdcc25374ff271d9 < 56ad3f475482bca55b0ae544031333018eb145b3, 4f4853dc1c9c1994f6f756eabdcc25374ff271d9 < 84a53580c5d2138c7361c7c3eea5b31827e63b35, 4.10
Fixed
Linux: < 4.10, 4.14.293 ≤ 4.14.*, 4.19.258 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.213 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.143 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.68 ≤ 5.15.*, 5.19.9 ≤ 5.19.*, 6.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 3 May 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 18:45 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-53566
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-48687 · cve.blacktree.nl