BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2023
CVE-2022-42784High confidence

A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO!

Siemens · LOGO! 12/24RCE

Official source article: Siemens SSA-844582 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.6HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.25% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Apply the linked authoritative mitigation while planning the permanent fix.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Siemens LOGO! 12/24RCE and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-844582 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalSiemens ProductCERTSSA-844582: Electromagnetic Fault Injection in LOGO! V8.3 BM Devices Results in Broken LOGO! V8.3 Product CA
16 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA1)
  • SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA1)
  • SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA1)
  • SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA1)
  • SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA1)
Summary
Affected devices are vulnerable to an electromagnetic fault injection. This could allow an attacker to dump and debug the firmware, including the manipulation of memory. Further actions could allow to inject public keys of custom created key pairs which are then signed by the product CA. The generation of a custom certificate allows communication with, and impersonation of, any device of the same version.
Remediation
Use HTTPS communication only in trusted networks without unknown network devices
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-45847

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3). Affected devices are vulnerable to an electromagnetic fault injection. This could allow an attacker to dump and debug the firmware, including the manipulation of memory. Further actions could allow to inject public keys of custom created key pairs which are then signed by the product CA. The generation of a custom certificate allows communication with, and impersonation of, any device of the same version.

What

A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3). Affected devices are vulnerable to an electromagnetic fault injection. This could allow an attacker to dump and debug the firmware, including the manipulation of memory. Further actions could allow to inject public keys of custom created key pairs which are then signed by the product CA. The generation of a custom certificate allows communication with, and impersonation of, any device of the same version.

Why

The device is susceptible to electromagnetic fault injection attacks, causing device internal information to be compromised or security mechanisms to be bypassed.

How

An attacker operating through physical access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA1) (All versions >= V8.3). Affected devices are vulnerable to an electromagnetic fault injection. This could allow an attacker to dump and debug the firmware, including the manipulation of memory. Further actions could allow to inject public keys of custom created key pairs which are then signed by the product CA. The generation of a custom certificate allows communication with, and impersonation of, any device of the same version.

Why

The device is susceptible to electromagnetic fault injection attacks, causing device internal information to be compromised or security mechanisms to be bypassed.

How

An attacker operating through physical access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
physical access → Improper Protection against Electromagnetic Fault Injection (EM-FI) → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Physical
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-1319 ↗

CWE-1319: Improper Protection against Electromagnetic Fault Injection (EM-FI). The device is susceptible to electromagnetic fault injection attacks, causing device internal information to be compromised or security mechanisms to be bypassed.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVPhysicalAttack vector: The attacker needs physical access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
UnauthenticatedCWE-1319
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20231213Security Bulletin 13 Dec 2023

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 13 Dec 2023, published on 13 December 2023. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-1015Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

ecord?id=CVE-2022-35260 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35737 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3715 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37454 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3821 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40303 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40304 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40674 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42784 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42898 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4304 Référence CVE CVE-2022-43551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43551 Référence CVE CVE-2022-43552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43552 Référence CVE CVE-2022-43680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43680 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-024738複数のシーメンス製品における脆弱性

6ed1052-1md08-0ba1 ファームウェア、6ed1052-2md08-0ba1 ファームウェア、6ed1052-1cc08-0ba1 ファームウェア等複数のシーメンス製品には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Use HTTPS communication only in trusted networks without unknown network devices
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 12 Dec 2023 · Last source change 8 Oct 2024, 08:39 UTC · CWE-1319 · Improper Protection against Electromagnetic Fault Injection (EM-FI)

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-45847
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-45847↗Vendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT · Siemens SSA-844582↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-42784 · cve.blacktree.nl