BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2022-38177High confidence

Memory leak in ECDSA DNSSEC verification code

ISC · BIND9

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 3.15% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs ISC BIND9 and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainbindVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.9.18.7-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainbindVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.9.18.7-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainbindVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.9.18.7-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcebind9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9.17.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcebind9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9.17.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcebind9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9.17.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcebind9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9.17.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
2NGA002579 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalABB Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT)CVE-2022-38177
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • ABB M2M Gateway ARM600, firmware versions >=4.1.2|<=5.0.3
  • ABB M2M Gateway SW, software versions >=5.0.1|<=5.0.3
Summary
By spoofing the target resolver with responses that have a malformed ECDSA signature, an attacker can trigger a small memory leak. It is possible to gradually erode available memory to the point where named crashes for lack of resources.
Remediation
Mitigating factors describe conditions and circumstances that make an attack that exploits the vulnerability difficult or less likely to succeed. The following mitigations are recommended. 3. ARM600 system is by default not dependent on the name service (DNS). If name service is not used in the system, the name service port (TCP/UDP port 53) can be blocked by a firewall. Refer to section General security recommendations for additional advice on how to keep your system secure.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-40773

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

By spoofing the target resolver with responses that have a malformed ECDSA signature, an attacker can trigger a small memory leak. It is possible to gradually erode available memory to the point where named crashes for lack of resources.

What

By spoofing the target resolver with responses that have a malformed ECDSA signature, an attacker can trigger a small memory leak. It is possible to gradually erode available memory to the point where named crashes for lack of resources.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

By spoofing the target resolver with responses that have a malformed ECDSA signature, an attacker can trigger a small memory leak. It is possible to gradually erode available memory to the point where named crashes for lack of resources.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0794Dell ECS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell ECS ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Programmcode mit Administratorrechten auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1492Internet Systems Consortium BIND: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Internet Systems Consortium BIND ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20220928Security Bulletin 28 Sep 2022

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 28 Sep 2022, published on 28 September 2022. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0120Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans les produits IBM . Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0051Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

ord?id=CVE-2022-23852 Référence CVE CVE-2022-24903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25235 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25236 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2526 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25315 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29154 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32250 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34169 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38177 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38178 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22391 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22393 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22394 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22395 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22396 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22397 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-848Multiples vulnérabilités dans Bind

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Bind. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-1059Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-1025Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM QRadar

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans IBM QRadar. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-002543BIND における named をクラッシュされる脆弱性

BIND には、named をクラッシュされる脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-002542BIND における小さなメモリリークを引き起こされる脆弱性

BIND には、小さなメモリリークを引き起こされる脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-002541BIND における小さなメモリリークを引き起こされる脆弱性

BIND には、小さなメモリリークを引き起こされる脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-002540BIND における読まれるべきでないメモリを読まれる脆弱性

BIND には、読まれるべきでないメモリを読まれる脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-002539BIND における利用可能なメモリを徐々に侵食される脆弱性

BIND には、利用可能なメモリを徐々に侵食される脆弱性があります。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-002538BIND におけるリゾルバのパフォーマンスを大幅に低下される脆弱性

BIND には、リゾルバのパフォーマンスを大幅に低下される脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5736BIND DNS 취약점 보안 업데이트 권고

ECDSA DNSSEC 및 EdDSA DNSSEC의 확인 코드에서 발생하는 메모리 누수 취약점 (CVE-2022-38177, CVE-2022-38178) [3][4]

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Upgrade to the patched release most closely related to your current version of BIND: BIND 9.16.33, or for BIND Supported Preview Edition (a special feature preview branch of BIND provided to eligible ISC support customers): BIND 9.16.33-S1.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Mitigating factors describe conditions and circumstances that make an attack that exploits the vulnerability difficult or less likely to succeed. The following mitigations are recommended. 3. ARM600 system is by default not dependent on the name service (DNS). If name service is not used in the system, the name service port (TCP/UDP port 53) can be blocked by a firewall. Refer to section General security recommendations for additional advice on how to keep your system secure.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 Sept 2022 · Last source change 28 May 2025, 15:23 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-40773
Product sourceVendor CSAF · ABB Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT)
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · ABB Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT)
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added remediation: search.abb.com/Download.aspx?DocumentID=2NGA002579&LanguageCode=en&DocumentPartId=pdf&Action=Launch; removed remediation: nvd.nist.gov/CVE-2022-38177.
    Before
    remediation: nvd.nist.gov/CVE-2022-38177
    After
    remediation: search.abb.com/Download.aspx?DocumentID=2NGA002579&LanguageCode=en&DocumentPartId=pdf&Action=Launch
    ABB Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-38177 · cve.blacktree.nl