BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2022-36227High confidence

n/a — NULL Pointer Dereference

Unknown · Unknown

Official source article: Siemens SSA-806742 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 2.44% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainlibarchiveVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.6.1-r2Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainlibarchiveVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.6.1-r2Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainlibarchiveVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.6.1-r2Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelibarchiveVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.6.2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelibarchiveVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.6.2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelibarchiveVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.6.2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelibarchiveVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.6.2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-806742 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-806742: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-300 before V2.4
11 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SCALANCE XCH328 (6GK5328-4TS01-2EC2)
  • SCALANCE XCM324 (6GK5324-8TS01-2AC2)
  • SCALANCE XCM328 (6GK5328-4TS01-2AC2)
  • SCALANCE XCM332 (6GK5332-0GA01-2AC2)
  • SCALANCE XRH334 (24 V DC, 8xFO, CC) (6GK5334-2TS01-2ER3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (230 V AC, 12xFO) (6GK5334-3TS01-3AR3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (230 V AC, 8xFO) (6GK5334-2TS01-3AR3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (24 V DC, 12xFO) (6GK5334-3TS01-2AR3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (24 V DC, 8xFO) (6GK5334-2TS01-2AR3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (2x230 V AC, 12xFO) (6GK5334-3TS01-4AR3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (2x230 V AC, 8xFO) (6GK5334-2TS01-4AR3)
Summary
In libarchive before 3.6.2, the software does not check for an error after calling calloc function that can return with a NULL pointer if the function fails, which leads to a resultant NULL pointer dereference. NOTE: the discoverer cites this CWE-476 remark but third parties dispute the code-execution impact: "In rare circumstances, when NULL is equivalent to the 0x0 memory address and privileged code can access it, then writing or reading memory is possible, which may lead to code execution."
Remediation
Update to V2.4 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-38946

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In libarchive before 3.6.2, the software does not check for an error after calling calloc function that can return with a NULL pointer if the function fails, which leads to a resultant NULL pointer dereference. NOTE: the discoverer cites this CWE-476 remark but third parties dispute the code-execution impact: "In rare circumstances, when NULL is equivalent to the 0x0 memory address and privileged code can access it, then writing or reading memory is possible, which may lead to code execution."

What

In libarchive before 3.6.2, the software does not check for an error after calling calloc function that can return with a NULL pointer if the function fails, which leads to a resultant NULL pointer dereference. NOTE: the discoverer cites this CWE-476 remark but third parties dispute the code-execution impact: "In rare circumstances, when NULL is equivalent to the 0x0 memory address and privileged code can access it, then writing or reading memory is possible, which may lead to code execution."

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In libarchive before 3.6.2, the software does not check for an error after calling calloc function that can return with a NULL pointer if the function fails, which leads to a resultant NULL pointer dereference. NOTE: the discoverer cites this CWE-476 remark but third parties dispute the code-execution impact: "In rare circumstances, when NULL is equivalent to the 0x0 memory address and privileged code can access it, then writing or reading memory is possible, which may lead to code execution."

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1307Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh Containers: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh Containers ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, einen 'Denial of Service'-Zustand erzuegen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-2229Splunk Splunk Enterprise: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, authentifizierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Splunk Splunk Enterprise ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen 'Denial of Service'-Zustand zu verursachen, seine Privilegien zu erweitern und weitere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1542Red Hat OpenShift: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1424Xerox FreeFlow Print Server für Solaris: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Verfügbarkeit und Integrität des Systems zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-2143libarchive: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Codeausführung

Ein Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in libarchive ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1350Splunk Splunk Enterprise: Mehrere Schwachstellen in Komponenten von Drittanbietern

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Splunk Splunk Enterprise in diversen Komponenten von Drittanbietern ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20221123Security Bulletin 23 Nov 2022

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Nov 2022, published on 23 November 2022. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

g/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35205 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35206 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35252 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3570 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3597 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3598 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3599 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36227 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3626 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3627 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38476 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38533 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3970 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40090 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-20

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

rg/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35252 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3570 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35737 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3597 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3598 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3599 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3602 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36087 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36227 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3626 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3627 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3715 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37454 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3786 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37967 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0119Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

ERecord?id=CVE-2022-29536 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29862 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32148 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3294 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3437 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34918 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36021 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36227 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36760 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37436 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37454 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38725 Référence CVE CVE-2022-39189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-39189 Référence CVE CVE-2022-39260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-39260 Référence CVE CVE-2022-41409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0701Multiples vulnérabilités dans Splunk

ERecord?id=CVE-2022-32208 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32221 Référence CVE CVE-2022-33987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33987 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3509 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3510 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3517 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35252 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35260 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35737 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36227 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37599 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37601 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37603 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38900 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40023 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40899 Référence CVE CVE-2022-41715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0428Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

ord?id=CVE-2022-32206 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32207 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32208 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32221 Référence CVE CVE-2022-33987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33987 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3517 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35252 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35260 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35737 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36227 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37599 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37601 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37603 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37616 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38900 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40023 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-021676libarchive の libarchive 他複数ベンダの製品における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

libarchive の libarchive 他複数ベンダの製品には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Nov 2022 · Last source change 3 Nov 2025, 21:46 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-38946
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-36227 · cve.blacktree.nl