BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2023
CVE-2022-35759High confidence

Windows Local Security Authority (LSA) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Microsoft · Windows 10 Version 1809

6.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 1.70% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809 and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-38632

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Windows Local Security Authority (LSA) Denial of Service Vulnerability

What

Windows Local Security Authority (LSA) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

Windows Local Security Authority (LSA) Denial of Service Vulnerability

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkDenial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20230607Security Bulletin 07 Jun 2023

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 07 Jun 2023, published on 7 June 2023. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-729Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Windows

022-35754 du 09 août 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-35754 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-35755 du 09 août 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-35755 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-35756 du 09 août 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-35756 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-35757 du 09 août 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-35757 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-35758 du 09 août 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-35758 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-35759 du 09 août 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-35759 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-35760 du 09 août 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-35760 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-35761 du 09 août 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-35761 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-35762 du 09 août 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-35762 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-35763 du 09 août 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-35763 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-005697複数の Microsoft Windows 製品におけるサービス運用妨害 (DoS) の脆弱性

複数の Microsoft Windows 製品には、Windows ローカル セキュリティ機関 (LSA) に不備があるため、サービス運用妨害 (DoS) の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5693MS 8월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

ling Protocol (SSTP) CVE-2022-35767 Windows SSTP(Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol) 원격 코드 실행 취약성 Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) CVE-2022-35766 Windows SSTP(Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol) 원격 코드 실행 취약성 Windows Storage Spaces Direct CVE-2022-35765 저장소 공간 다이렉트 권한 상승 취약성 Windows Storage Spaces Direct CVE-2022-35764 저장소 공간 다이렉트 권한 상승 취약성 Windows Storage Spaces Direct CVE-2022-35763 저장소 공간 다이렉트 권한 상승 취약성 Windows Storage Spaces Direct CVE-2022-35762 저장소 공간 다이렉트 권한 상승 취약성 Windows Kernel CVE-2022-35761 Windows 커널 권한 상승 취약성 Microsoft ATA Port Driver CVE-2022-35760 Microsoft ATA 포트 드라이버 권한 상승 취약성 Windows Local Security Authority (LSA) CVE-2022-35759 Windows LSA(로컬 보안 기관) 서비스 거부 취약성 Windows Kernel CVE-2022-35758 Windows 커널 메모리 정보 유출 취약성 Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver CVE-2022-35757 Windows 클라우드 파일 미니 필터 드라이버 권한 상승 취약성 Windows Kerberos CVE-2022-35756 Windows Kerberos 권한 상승 취약성 Windows Print Spooler Components CVE-2022-35755 Windows 인쇄 스풀러 권한 상승 취약성 Windows Unified Write Filter CVE-2022-35754 통합 쓰기 필터 권한 상승 취약성 Remote Access Service Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol CVE-2022-35753 Windows SSTP(Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol) 원격 코드 실행 취약성 Remote Access Service Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol CVE-2022-35752 Windows SSTP(Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol) 원격 코드 실행 취약성 Role: Windows

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 31 May 2023 · Last source change 2 Jan 2025, 19:34 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-38632
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-35759 · cve.blacktree.nl