BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2022-34903High confidence

n/a — Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

Unknown · Unknown

Official source article: Siemens SSA-202008 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

6.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 3 Aug 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 2.84% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · maingnupgVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.2.35-r4Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · maingnupgVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.2.35-r4Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · maingnupgVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.2.35-r4Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcegnupg2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.2.35-3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcegnupg2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.2.35-3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcegnupg2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.2.35-3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcegnupg2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.2.35-3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-202008 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-202008: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ruggedcom Rox Before V2.17.0
11 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000
Summary
GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constraints (e.g., use of GPGME) are met, allows signature forgery via injection into the status line.
Remediation
Update to V2.17.0 or later version
SSA-806742 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-806742: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-300 before V2.4
11 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SCALANCE XCH328 (6GK5328-4TS01-2EC2)
  • SCALANCE XCM324 (6GK5324-8TS01-2AC2)
  • SCALANCE XCM328 (6GK5328-4TS01-2AC2)
  • SCALANCE XCM332 (6GK5332-0GA01-2AC2)
  • SCALANCE XRH334 (24 V DC, 8xFO, CC) (6GK5334-2TS01-2ER3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (230 V AC, 12xFO) (6GK5334-3TS01-3AR3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (230 V AC, 8xFO) (6GK5334-2TS01-3AR3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (24 V DC, 12xFO) (6GK5334-3TS01-2AR3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (24 V DC, 8xFO) (6GK5334-2TS01-2AR3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (2x230 V AC, 12xFO) (6GK5334-3TS01-4AR3)
  • SCALANCE XRM334 (2x230 V AC, 8xFO) (6GK5334-2TS01-4AR3)
Summary
GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constraints (e.g., use of GPGME) are met, allows signature forgery via injection into the status line.
Remediation
Update to V2.4 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-37807

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constraints (e.g., use of GPGME) are met, allows signature forgery via injection into the status line.

What

GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constraints (e.g., use of GPGME) are met, allows signature forgery via injection into the status line.

Why

The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constraints (e.g., use of GPGME) are met, allows signature forgery via injection into the status line.

Why

The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-74 ↗

CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'). The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-74Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0794Dell ECS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell ECS ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Programmcode mit Administratorrechten auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1542Red Hat OpenShift: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1715Red Hat Enterprise Linux (Advanced Cluster Management): Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advanced Cluster Management ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0511GnuPGP: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Umgehen von Sicherheitsvorkehrungen

Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in GnuPGP ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20220706Security Bulletin 06 Jul 2022

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 Jul 2022, published on 6 July 2022. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

cord?id=CVE-2022-3219 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32205 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32206 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32207 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32208 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32221 Référence CVE CVE-2022-33070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33070 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34526 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3479 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35205 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35206 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35252 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3570 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3597 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3598 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2022-32546 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32547 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32743 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3278 Référence CVE CVE-2022-33068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33068 Référence CVE CVE-2022-33099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33099 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3358 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34169 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34526 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35252 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3570 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35737 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3597 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3598 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3599 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ERecord?id=CVE-2022-23219 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25883 Référence CVE CVE-2022-27772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-27782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27782 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2795 Référence CVE CVE-2022-28321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28321 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29824 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3219 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3358 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-35737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35737 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3602 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3715 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3786 Référence CVE CVE-2022-39046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-39046 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3996 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0119Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

Record?id=CVE-2022-2880 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29154 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29162 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29187 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29536 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29536 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29862 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32148 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3294 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3437 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34918 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36021 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36227 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36760 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37436 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37454 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-1069Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-012730The GnuPG Project の GnuPG 他複数ベンダの製品におけるインジェクションに関する脆弱性

The GnuPG Project の GnuPG 他複数ベンダの製品には、インジェクションに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0382Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten

GnuPGP has multiple vulnerabilities, including signature forgery and status injection issues, while recent updates to gpg2 and Docker images for Dagster-cloud and Spectrafit address these security concerns.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Update to V2.17.0 or later version
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Jul 2022 · Last source change 3 Aug 2024, 09:22 UTC · CWE-74 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-37807
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: Update to V2.17.0 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
Fixed release recorded from official guidance
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-37807↗Siemens ProductCERT security advisory · Siemens SSA-202008↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Public exploit reference↗Public exploit reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-34903 · cve.blacktree.nl