BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2022-3064High confidence

Excessive resource consumption in gopkg.in/yaml.v2

gopkg.in/yaml.v2 · gopkg.in/yaml.v2

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

3 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · esm-appssingularity-containerUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegolang-github-coreos-discovery-etcd-ioUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivewebhookUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2022-3064 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitygo-yaml: Improve heuristics preventing CPU/memory abuse by parsing malicious or large YAML documents
77 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • cryostat-tech-preview/cryostat-rhel8-operator as a component of Cryostat 2
  • cli as a component of OpenShift Serverless
  • rhacm2/config-policy-controller-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2
  • advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 3
  • advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-roxctl-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 3
  • advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-db-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 3
  • advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 3
  • advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-slim-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 3
  • rhc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • rhc.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • skopeo.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • toolbox-tests (container-tools:3.0) as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Summary
A flaw was found in go-yaml. This issue causes the consumption of excessive amounts of CPU or memory when attempting to parse a large or maliciously crafted YAML document.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-7537

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Parsing malicious or large YAML documents can consume excessive amounts of CPU or memory.

What

Parsing malicious or large YAML documents can consume excessive amounts of CPU or memory.

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Parsing malicious or large YAML documents can consume excessive amounts of CPU or memory.

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Uncontrolled Resource Consumption → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-400

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption. The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-400
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2023-0468Red Hat OpenShift: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Red Hat OpenShift ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
cryostat-tech-preview/cryostat-rhel8-operator as a component of Cryostat 2; cli as a component of OpenShift Serverless; rhacm2/config-policy-controller-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2; advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 3; advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-roxctl-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 3; advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-db-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 3; advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 3; advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-scanner-slim-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 3; rhc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; rhc.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; skopeo.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; toolbox-tests (container-tools:3.0) as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; toolbox.src (container-tools:3.0) as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; toolbox (container-tools:3.0) as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; butane as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; butane.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9; ansible-service-broker as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; ansible-service-broker-container-scripts as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; ansible-service-broker-selinux as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; ansible-service-broker.src as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; atomic-enterprise-service-catalog as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; atomic-enterprise-service-catalog-svcat as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; atomic-enterprise-service-catalog.src as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; atomic-openshift as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; atomic-openshift-clients as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; atomic-openshift-clients-redistributable as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; atomic-openshift-descheduler as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; atomic-openshift-descheduler.src as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; atomic-openshift-docker-excluder as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; atomic-openshift-dockerregistry as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11; and 47 more
Fixed
openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8@sha256:100795f5d8f6d7add9428e1b4838b67b59db14b0fae7372ab16c6871d4ddb32e_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.5; openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8@sha256:0c5bee99b57d4c22542b4db0bb3c0cbb8cfc2ec5aabbb558de46113595068959_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.6; openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8@sha256:58bba66450206469ebe607691b61afc2146d96d26ffedfc6f506fde172f31674_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.6; openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8@sha256:77d3b63cebeb6a1ca940dd93a00ef2ccbca5d32b5e54ee2bbedba20f38146bc4_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.6; openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8@sha256:1162e57874f39e1edbed8db181ec06edef1585a2f643f0121fcdd291059345d8_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.7; openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8@sha256:98f30bf044386bb6343a266829e40b4fdc9bd83ad4f8139d103f939b5a527b7d_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.7; openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8@sha256:eb9a7c5dcc7ef24a113743cbae3749830be6cf9116fffd591c8e244f47a5b3c8_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.7; etcd-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1; etcd-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.src as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1; etcd-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1; etcd-debuginfo-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1; etcd-debuginfo-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1; etcd-debugsource-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1; etcd-debugsource-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1; etcd-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2; etcd-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.src as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2; etcd-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2; etcd-debuginfo-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2; etcd-debuginfo-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2; etcd-debugsource-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2; etcd-debugsource-0:3.3.23-12.el8ost.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2; devspaces/configbump-rhel8@sha256:1e109e2572b3db1610ae07c1580837fc03813927ab8230f06a452ea51e4ea1fd_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/configbump-rhel8@sha256:7ad719f34df4ff6ca4afc67610c616f1ab5961be60a7e80d7e35af3374dc2a2e_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/configbump-rhel8@sha256:f0cf2be9026fed74449daf382907d5014cc72998be0edb32a3aeb150754030ea_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; openshift4/ose-configmap-reloader@sha256:2a9cad389abc72e4ae763a9a5131daa333e2a6eb677ef1190cceb30785586056_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.10; openshift4/ose-configmap-reloader@sha256:78db6b2affcb9dd2a38fd093b1493a89fe954fec163a74eb5e085dd51b619e5f_arm64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.10; openshift4/ose-configmap-reloader@sha256:846748c034e096147ef78d1bf65e1ebe29dd43220a1858849491ca165d99bac8_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.10; openshift4/ose-configmap-reloader@sha256:d37432dabadce3bfcfe7939479bdedde30b4d0ad4309982ecb7eccb9f063bb1b_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.10; openshift4/ose-sriov-cni@sha256:2903d91fe81096e77dc2791f4ba9d1282ac6f66bd2ba462b67fcd2f5e0ac3e9d_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.10; openshift4/ose-sriov-cni@sha256:470f58581cb5560ad04b510655dc594f71396e73180374da696df505eb89993e_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.10; and 628 more
Action
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 Dec 2022 · Last source change 14 Apr 2025, 17:05 UTC · CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-7537
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-3064 · cve.blacktree.nl