BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2022-2868High confidence

libtiff's tiffcrop utility has a improper input validation flaw that can lead to out of bounds read and ultimately cause a crash if an attacker is able to supply a crafted file to tiffcrop

Unknown · libtiff

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.32% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown libtiff and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · maintiffVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.4.4.0-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · maintiffVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.4.4.0-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · maintiffVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.4.4.0-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcetiffVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.4.0~rc1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcetiffVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.4.0~rc1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcetiffVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.4.0~rc1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcetiffVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.4.0~rc1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-35102

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

libtiff's tiffcrop utility has a improper input validation flaw that can lead to out of bounds read and ultimately cause a crash if an attacker is able to supply a crafted file to tiffcrop.

What

libtiff's tiffcrop utility has a improper input validation flaw that can lead to out of bounds read and ultimately cause a crash if an attacker is able to supply a crafted file to tiffcrop.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

libtiff's tiffcrop utility has a improper input validation flaw that can lead to out of bounds read and ultimately cause a crash if an attacker is able to supply a crafted file to tiffcrop.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Input Validation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-20 ↗

CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-20
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0794Dell ECS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell ECS ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Programmcode mit Administratorrechten auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0561Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Verfügbarkeit und Integrität des Systems zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1061libTIFF: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in libTIFF ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20220824Security Bulletin 24 Aug 2022

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 24 Aug 2022, published on 24 August 2022. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2022-27776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-27780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27780 Référence CVE CVE-2022-27781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27781 Référence CVE CVE-2022-27782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27782 Référence CVE CVE-2022-28131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28131 Référence CVE CVE-2022-28321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28321 Référence CVE CVE-2022-28327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28327 Référence CVE CVE-2022-28463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28463 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2867 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2868 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2869 Référence CVE CVE-2022-28738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28738 Référence CVE CVE-2022-28739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28739 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2874 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2879 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2880 Référence CVE CVE-2022-28805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28805 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1103Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2022-22823 Référence CVE CVE-2022-22824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22824 Référence CVE CVE-2022-22825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22825 Référence CVE CVE-2022-22826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22826 Référence CVE CVE-2022-22827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22827 Référence CVE CVE-2022-22844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22844 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23852 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23990 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2867 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2868 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2869 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34266 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34526 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34749 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3479 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3570 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3597 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-015005LibTIFF の LibTIFF 他複数ベンダの製品における入力で指定された数量の不適切な検証に関する脆弱性

LibTIFF の LibTIFF 他複数ベンダの製品には、入力で指定された数量の不適切な検証に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
libtiff: libtiff 4.4.0rc1
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 17 Aug 2022 · Last source change 3 Aug 2024, 00:52 UTC · CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-35102
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-2868 · cve.blacktree.nl