BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2022-23278High confidence

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Spoofing Vulnerability

Microsoft · Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux

5.9MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 1.89% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Microsoft Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-28364

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Spoofing Vulnerability

What

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Spoofing Vulnerability

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Spoofing Vulnerability

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20220316Security Bulletin 16 Mar 2022

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 16 Mar 2022, published on 16 March 2022. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-227Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

022-22006 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-22006 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-22007 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-22007 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23265 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23265 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23266 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23266 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23277 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23277 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23278 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23278 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23282 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23282 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23295 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23295 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23300 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23300 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23301 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23301 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-225Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Windows

022-21975 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-21975 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-21977 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-21977 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-21990 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-21990 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-22010 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-22010 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23253 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23253 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23278 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23278 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23281 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23281 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23283 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23283 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23284 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23284 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-23285 du 08 mars 2022 https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-23285 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-001445Microsoft Defender for Endpoint におけるなりすまされる脆弱性

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint には、なりすまされる脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6528MS 7월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

024-49000 | SQL Server Native Client 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | CVE-2024-43614 | Linux의 엔드포인트용 Microsoft Defender 스푸핑 취약성 | | Azure Stack | CVE-2024-38179 | Azure Stack HCI(하이퍼 컨버지드 인프라) 권한 상승 취약성 | | Visual Studio | CVE-2024-29187 | GitHub: CVE-2024-29187 WiX Burn 기반 번들은 시스템으로 실행될 때 바이너리 하이재킹에 취약 | | Windows Secure Boot | CVE-2024-28923 | 보안 부팅 보안 기능 우회 취약성 | | Windows Secure Kernel Mode | CVE-2024-21302 | Windows 보안 커널 모드 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Secure Boot | CVE-2023-24932 | 보안 부팅 보안 기능 우회 취약성 | | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | CVE-2022-33637 | 엔드포인트용 Microsoft Defender 변조 취약성 | | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | CVE-2022-23278 | 끝점용 Microsoft Defender 스푸핑 취약성 | ##### □ 작성 : 위협분석단 취약점분석팀

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5524MS 3월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

취약성 Windows COM CVE-2022-23290 Windows Inking COM 권한 상승 취약성 Windows DWM Core Library CVE-2022-23288 Windows DWM 핵심 라이브러리 권한 상승 취약성 Microsoft Windows ALPC CVE-2022-23287 Windows ALPC 권한 상승 취약성 Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver CVE-2022-23286 Windows 클라우드 파일 미니 필터 드라이버 권한 상승 취약성 Windows Remote Desktop CVE-2022-23285 원격 데스크톱 클라이언트 원격 코드 실행 취약성 Windows Print Spooler Components CVE-2022-23284 Windows 인쇄 스풀러 권한 상승 취약성 Microsoft Windows ALPC CVE-2022-23283 Windows ALPC 권한 상승 취약성 Paint 3D CVE-2022-23282 Paint 3D 원격 코드 실행 취약성 Windows Common Log File System Driver CVE-2022-23281 Windows 공용 로그 파일 시스템 드라이버 정보 유출 취약성 Microsoft Defender for Endpoint CVE-2022-23278 끝점용 Microsoft Defender 스푸핑 취약성 Microsoft Exchange Server CVE-2022-23277 Microsoft Exchange Server 원격 코드 실행 취약성 Microsoft Defender for IoT CVE-2022-23266 IoT용 Microsoft Defender 권한 상승 취약성 Microsoft Defender for IoT CVE-2022-23265 IoT용 Microsoft Defender 원격 코드 실행 취약성 Windows Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol CVE-2022-23253 지점 간 터널링 프로토콜 서비스 거부 취약성 Microsoft Windows Codecs Library CVE-2022-22010 미디어 파운데이션 정보 유출 취약성 Microsoft Windows Codecs Library CVE-2022-22007 HEVC 비디오 확장 원격 코드 실행 취약성 Microsoft Windows Codecs Library CVE-2022-22006 HEVC 비디오 확장 원격 코드 실행 취약성 Windows Remote Desktop CVE-2022-21990 원격 데스크톱 클라이언트 원격 코드 실행 취약성 Microsoft Windows Code

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
  • Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux: 101.0.0 < 101.60.93
  • Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Mac: 101.0.0 < 101.60.91
  • Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Android: 1.0.0.0 < 1.0.3011.0302
  • Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for iOS: 1.0.0.0 < 1.1.18090109
  • Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Windows: 1.0.0.0 < 10.0.19042.1586
  • Microsoft Defender for Endpoint EDR sensor: 1.0.0.0 < 10.8047.22439
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 Mar 2022 · Last source change 8 Jul 2025, 15:32 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-28364
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-23278 · cve.blacktree.nl