Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
- EPSS is 1.03% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceCybonet · Pineapp Mail Relay
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Patch availableCybonet - PineApp Mail Relay Unauthenticated Sql Injection. Attacker can send a request to: /manage/emailrichment/userlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 /admin/emailrichment/userlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 /manage/emailrichment/usersunlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 /admin/emailrichment/usersunlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 and by doing that, the attacker can run Remote Code Execution in one liner.
Cybonet - PineApp Mail Relay Unauthenticated Sql Injection. Attacker can send a request to: /manage/emailrichment/userlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 /admin/emailrichment/userlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 /manage/emailrichment/usersunlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 /admin/emailrichment/usersunlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 and by doing that, the attacker can run Remote Code Execution in one liner.
Attacker-controlled data is not kept separate from SQL query syntax, allowing the intended database operation to be changed.
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
Cybonet - PineApp Mail Relay Unauthenticated Sql Injection. Attacker can send a request to: /manage/emailrichment/userlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 /admin/emailrichment/userlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 /manage/emailrichment/usersunlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 /admin/emailrichment/usersunlist.php?CUSTOMER_ID_INNER=1 and by doing that, the attacker can run Remote Code Execution in one liner.
Attacker-controlled data is not kept separate from SQL query syntax, allowing the intended database operation to be changed.
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection'). The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:HCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 24 Feb 2022 · Last source change 17 Sept 2024, 03:44 UTC · CWE-89 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.