BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2022-2048High confidence

The Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Jetty — Insufficient Resource Pool

The Eclipse Foundation · Eclipse Jetty

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-6436

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

In Eclipse Jetty HTTP/2 server implementation, when encountering an invalid HTTP/2 request, the error handling has a bug that can wind up not properly cleaning up the active connections and associated resources. This can lead to a Denial of Service scenario where there are no enough resources left to process good requests.

What

In Eclipse Jetty HTTP/2 server implementation, when encountering an invalid HTTP/2 request, the error handling has a bug that can wind up not properly cleaning up the active connections and associated resources. This can lead to a Denial of Service scenario where there are no enough resources left to process good requests.

Why

The product's resource pool is not large enough to handle peak demand, which allows an attacker to prevent others from accessing the resource by using a (relatively) large number of requests for resources.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In Eclipse Jetty HTTP/2 server implementation, when encountering an invalid HTTP/2 request, the error handling has a bug that can wind up not properly cleaning up the active connections and associated resources. This can lead to a Denial of Service scenario where there are no enough resources left to process good requests.

Why

The product's resource pool is not large enough to handle peak demand, which allows an attacker to prevent others from accessing the resource by using a (relatively) large number of requests for resources.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Insufficient Resource Pool → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-410 ↗

CWE-410: Insufficient Resource Pool. The product's resource pool is not large enough to handle peak demand, which allows an attacker to prevent others from accessing the resource by using a (relatively) large number of requests for resources.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-410
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2024-0794Dell ECS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell ECS ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Programmcode mit Administratorrechten auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2023-1808Oracle Financial Services Applications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Financial Services Applications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2023-1017Oracle Financial Services Applications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Financial Services Applications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2023-0137Oracle Communications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Communications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2023-0133Oracle Financial Services Applications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Financial Services Applications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2023-0027IBM Tivoli Network Manager: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Tivoli Network Manager ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2022-1373Jenkins: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Jenkins ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2022-0614Eclipse Jetty: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Eclipse Jetty ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und Informationen zu manipulieren.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0357Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM Cognos

ord?id=CVE-2020-11023 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27218 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27223 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28165 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28169 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29425 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34428 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37533 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2047 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2048 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21443 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21449 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21624 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2191 Référence CVE CVE-2022-31160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31160 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38707 Référence CVE CVE-2022-420004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-952Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM QRadar

e.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37404 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38185 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0492 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1154 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1271 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1552 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1729 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1966 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2047 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2048 Référence CVE CVE-2022-22968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22968 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25169 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25762 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29885 Référence CVE CVE-2022-30126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30126 Référence CVE CVE-2022-30973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30973 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32250 Référence CVE CVE-2022-33879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
9.4.0 < unspecified; unspecified ≤ 9.4.46; 10.0.0 < unspecified; unspecified ≤ 10.0.9; 11.0.0 < unspecified; unspecified ≤ 11.0.9
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 7 Jul 2022 · Last source change 3 Aug 2024, 00:24 UTC · CWE-410 · Insufficient Resource Pool

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-6436
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-6436↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-2048 · cve.blacktree.nl