BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2021-47548High confidence

ethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port()

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 1.36% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.15.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.15.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.15.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.15.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-34550

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port() The if statement: if (port >= DSAF_GE_NUM) return; limits the value of port less than DSAF_GE_NUM (i.e., 8). However, if the value of port is 6 or 7, an array overflow could occur: port_rst_off = dsaf_dev->mac_cb[port]->port_rst_off; because the length of dsaf_dev->mac_cb is DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM (i.e., 6). To fix this possible array overflow, we first check port and if it is greater than or equal to DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM, the function returns.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port() The if statement: if (port >= DSAF_GE_NUM) return; limits the value of port less than DSAF_GE_NUM (i.e., 8). However, if the value of port is 6 or 7, an array overflow could occur: port_rst_off = dsaf_dev->mac_cb[port]->port_rst_off; because the length of dsaf_dev->mac_cb is DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM (i.e., 6). To fix this possible array overflow, we first check port and if it is greater than or equal to DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM, the function returns.

Why

The product uses untrusted input when calculating or using an array index, but the product does not validate or incorrectly validates the index to ensure the index references a valid position within the array.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port() The if statement: if (port >= DSAF_GE_NUM) return; limits the value of port less than DSAF_GE_NUM (i.e., 8). However, if the value of port is 6 or 7, an array overflow could occur: port_rst_off = dsaf_dev->mac_cb[port]->port_rst_off; because the length of dsaf_dev->mac_cb is DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM (i.e., 6). To fix this possible array overflow, we first check port and if it is greater than or equal to DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM, the function returns.

Why

The product uses untrusted input when calculating or using an array index, but the product does not validate or incorrectly validates the index to ensure the index references a valid position within the array.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Validation of Array Index → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-129 ↗

CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index. The product uses untrusted input when calculating or using an array index, but the product does not validate or incorrectly validates the index to ensure the index references a valid position within the array.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-129
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1913Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien und Daten zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1235Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und unspezifische Angriffe

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder unspezifische Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240529Security Bulletin 29 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 May 2024, published on 29 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2021-47455 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47456 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47461 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47466 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47495 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47497 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47527 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47560 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47579 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47582 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47609 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2047 Référence CVE CVE-2022-24785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24785 Référence CVE CVE-2022-24823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0072Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Secure Analytics

d?id=CVE-2021-47018 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47257 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47284 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47304 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47408 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47461 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47579 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48743 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48747 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28746 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2021-47257 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47284 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47304 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47408 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47449 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47461 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47579 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23181 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23471 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23648 Référence CVE CVE-2022-24999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24999 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25762 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0668Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2021-47257 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47284 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47304 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47393 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47408 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47461 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47468 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47579 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47624 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48637 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48743 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48747 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0644Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:4902 du 29 juillet 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4902 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:4928 du 31 juillet 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4928 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47459 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48743 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52458 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26737 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0612Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

ppc64le Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:4533 du 15 juillet 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4533 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:4583 du 17 juillet 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4583 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47596 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48627 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52638 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2021-47534 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47535 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47536 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47536 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47537 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47538 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47540 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47541 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47544 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47544 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47549 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47550 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47551 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47552 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47553 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47553 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47554 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47555 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2021-47534 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47535 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47536 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47536 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47537 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47538 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47540 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47541 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47542 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47544 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47544 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47549 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47550 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47551 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47552 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47553 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47553 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47554 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47554 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47555 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-021796Linux の Linux Kernel における配列インデックスの検証に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、配列インデックスの検証に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 850bfa3b78ea8849fef78ed74f5f2ccf947db0ca < 948968f8747650447c8f21c9fdba0e1973be040b, 850bfa3b78ea8849fef78ed74f5f2ccf947db0ca < abbd5faa0748d0aa95d5191d56ff7a17a6275bd1, 850bfa3b78ea8849fef78ed74f5f2ccf947db0ca < dd07f8971b81ad98cc754b179b331b57f35aa1ff, 850bfa3b78ea8849fef78ed74f5f2ccf947db0ca < 99bb25cb6753beaf2c2bc37927c2ecc0ceff3f6d, 850bfa3b78ea8849fef78ed74f5f2ccf947db0ca < 22519eff7df2d88adcc2568d86046ce1e2b52803, 850bfa3b78ea8849fef78ed74f5f2ccf947db0ca < fc7ffa7f10b9454a86369405d9814bf141b30627, 850bfa3b78ea8849fef78ed74f5f2ccf947db0ca < a66998e0fbf213d47d02813b9679426129d0d114, 4.7
Fixed
Linux: < 4.7, 4.9.292 ≤ 4.9.*, 4.14.257 ≤ 4.14.*, 4.19.220 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.164 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.84 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.7 ≤ 5.15.*, 5.16 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 May 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 13:56 UTC · CWE-129 · Improper Validation of Array Index

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-34550
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-47548 · cve.blacktree.nl