BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2021-47192High confidence

scsi: core: sysfs: Fix hang when device state is set via sysfs

Linux · Linux

5.3MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-33840

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: sysfs: Fix hang when device state is set via sysfs This fixes a regression added with: commit f0f82e2476f6 ("scsi: core: Fix capacity set to zero after offlinining device") The problem is that after iSCSI recovery, iscsid will call into the kernel to set the dev's state to running, and with that patch we now call scsi_rescan_device() with the state_mutex held. If the SCSI error handler thread is just starting to test the device in scsi_send_eh_cmnd() then it's going to try to grab the state_mutex. We are then stuck, because when scsi_rescan_device() tries to send its I/O scsi_queue_rq() calls -> scsi_host_queue_ready() -> scsi_host_in_recovery() which will return true (the host state is still in recovery) and I/O will just be requeued. scsi_send_eh_cmnd() will then never be able to grab the state_mutex to finish error handling. To prevent the deadlock move the rescan-related code to after we drop the state_mutex. This also adds a check for if we are already in the running state. This prevents extra scans and helps the iscsid case where if the transport class has already onlined the device during its recovery process then we don't need userspace to do it again plus possibly block that daemon.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: sysfs: Fix hang when device state is set via sysfs This fixes a regression added with: commit f0f82e2476f6 ("scsi: core: Fix capacity set to zero after offlinining device") The problem is that after iSCSI recovery, iscsid will call into the kernel to set the dev's state to running, and with that patch we now call scsi_rescan_device() with the state_mutex held. If the SCSI error handler thread is just starting to test the device in scsi_send_eh_cmnd() then it's going to try to grab the state_mutex. We are then stuck, because when scsi_rescan_device() tries to send its I/O scsi_queue_rq() calls -> scsi_host_queue_ready() -> scsi_host_in_recovery() which will return true (the host state is still in recovery) and I/O will just be requeued. scsi_send_eh_cmnd() will then never be able to grab the state_mutex to finish error handling. To prevent the deadlock move the rescan-related code to after we drop the state_mutex. This also adds a check for if we are already in the running state. This prevents extra scans and helps the iscsid case where if the transport class has already onlined the device during its recovery process then we don't need userspace to do it again plus possibly block that daemon.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: sysfs: Fix hang when device state is set via sysfs This fixes a regression added with: commit f0f82e2476f6 ("scsi: core: Fix capacity set to zero after offlinining device") The problem is that after iSCSI recovery, iscsid will call into the kernel to set the dev's state to running, and with that patch we now call scsi_rescan_device() with the state_mutex held. If the SCSI error handler thread is just starting to test the device in scsi_send_eh_cmnd() then it's going to try to grab the state_mutex. We are then stuck, because when scsi_rescan_device() tries to send its I/O scsi_queue_rq() calls -> scsi_host_queue_ready() -> scsi_host_in_recovery() which will return true (the host state is still in recovery) and I/O will just be requeued. scsi_send_eh_cmnd() will then never be able to grab the state_mutex to finish error handling. To prevent the deadlock move the rescan-related code to after we drop the state_mutex. This also adds a check for if we are already in the running state. This prevents extra scans and helps the iscsid case where if the transport class has already onlined the device during its recovery process then we don't need userspace to do it again plus possibly block that daemon.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0851Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder unbekannte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240417Security Bulletin 17 Apr 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 17 Apr 2024, published on 17 April 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2021-46933 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46955 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47074 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47104 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47113 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47131 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47162 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47171 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47192 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47200 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47206 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47220 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47227 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47228 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47229 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47230 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2021-46933 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46955 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47074 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47104 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47113 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47131 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47162 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47171 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47192 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47200 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47206 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47220 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47227 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47228 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47229 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47230 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0420Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2021-47181 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47182 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47183 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47184 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47185 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47187 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47188 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47189 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47191 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47192 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47193 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47194 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47195 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47196 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47197 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47198 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47199 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-021830Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 69aa1a1a569f5c6d554b59352130ef363342ed4c < edd783162bf2385b43de6764f2d4c6e9f4f6be27, 711459514e297d748f15ba1f5292a3276c3d1dd0 < a792e0128d232251edb5fdf42fb0f9fbb0b44a73, f0f82e2476f6adb9c7a0135cfab8091456990c99 < bcc0e3175a976b7fa9a353960808adb0bb49ead8, f0f82e2476f6adb9c7a0135cfab8091456990c99 < 4edd8cd4e86dd3047e5294bbefcc0a08f66a430f, c6751ce1a2a415a78e4f5b621628da03196b804c, 5.4.143 < 5.4.162, 5.10.61 < 5.10.82, 5.13.13 < 5.14, 5.14
Fixed
Linux: < 5.14, 5.4.162 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.82 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.5 ≤ 5.15.*, 5.16 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 10 Apr 2024 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:19 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-33840
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-47192 · cve.blacktree.nl