BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2021-47069High confidence

ipc/mqueue, msg, sem: avoid relying on a stack reference past its expiry

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.26% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.10.40-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.10.40-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.10.40-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.10.40-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-33717

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipc/mqueue, msg, sem: avoid relying on a stack reference past its expiry do_mq_timedreceive calls wq_sleep with a stack local address. The sender (do_mq_timedsend) uses this address to later call pipelined_send. This leads to a very hard to trigger race where a do_mq_timedreceive call might return and leave do_mq_timedsend to rely on an invalid address, causing the following crash: RIP: 0010:wake_q_add_safe+0x13/0x60 Call Trace: __x64_sys_mq_timedsend+0x2a9/0x490 do_syscall_64+0x80/0x680 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f5928e40343 The race occurs as: 1. do_mq_timedreceive calls wq_sleep with the address of `struct ext_wait_queue` on function stack (aliased as `ewq_addr` here) - it holds a valid `struct ext_wait_queue *` as long as the stack has not been overwritten. 2. `ewq_addr` gets added to info->e_wait_q[RECV].list in wq_add, and do_mq_timedsend receives it via wq_get_first_waiter(info, RECV) to call __pipelined_op. 3. Sender calls __pipelined_op::smp_store_release(&this->state, STATE_READY). Here is where the race window begins. (`this` is `ewq_addr`.) 4. If the receiver wakes up now in do_mq_timedreceive::wq_sleep, it will see `state == STATE_READY` and break. 5. do_mq_timedreceive returns, and `ewq_addr` is no longer guaranteed to be a `struct ext_wait_queue *` since it was on do_mq_timedreceive's stack. (Although the address may not get overwritten until another function happens to touch it, which means it can persist around for an indefinite time.) 6. do_mq_timedsend::__pipelined_op() still believes `ewq_addr` is a `struct ext_wait_queue *`, and uses it to find a task_struct to pass to the wake_q_add_safe call. In the lucky case where nothing has overwritten `ewq_addr` yet, `ewq_addr->task` is the right task_struct. In the unlucky case, __pipelined_op::wake_q_add_safe gets handed a bogus address as the receiver's task_struct causing the crash. do_mq_timedsend::__pipelined_op() should not dereference `this` after setting STATE_READY, as the receiver counterpart is now free to return. Change __pipelined_op to call wake_q_add_safe on the receiver's task_struct returned by get_task_struct, instead of dereferencing `this` which sits on the receiver's stack. As Manfred pointed out, the race potentially also exists in ipc/msg.c::expunge_all and ipc/sem.c::wake_up_sem_queue_prepare. Fix those in the same way.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipc/mqueue, msg, sem: avoid relying on a stack reference past its expiry do_mq_timedreceive calls wq_sleep with a stack local address. The sender (do_mq_timedsend) uses this address to later call pipelined_send. This leads to a very hard to trigger race where a do_mq_timedreceive call might return and leave do_mq_timedsend to rely on an invalid address, causing the following crash: RIP: 0010:wake_q_add_safe+0x13/0x60 Call Trace: __x64_sys_mq_timedsend+0x2a9/0x490 do_syscall_64+0x80/0x680 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f5928e40343 The race occurs as: 1. do_mq_timedreceive calls wq_sleep with the address of `struct ext_wait_queue` on function stack (aliased as `ewq_addr` here) - it holds a valid `struct ext_wait_queue *` as long as the stack has not been overwritten. 2. `ewq_addr` gets added to info->e_wait_q[RECV].list in wq_add, and do_mq_timedsend receives it via wq_get_first_waiter(info, RECV) to call __pipelined_op. 3. Sender calls __pipelined_op::smp_store_release(&this->state, STATE_READY). Here is where the race window begins. (`this` is `ewq_addr`.) 4. If the receiver wakes up now in do_mq_timedreceive::wq_sleep, it will see `state == STATE_READY` and break. 5. do_mq_timedreceive returns, and `ewq_addr` is no longer guaranteed to be a `struct ext_wait_queue *` since it was on do_mq_timedreceive's stack. (Although the address may not get overwritten until another function happens to touch it, which means it can persist around for an indefinite time.) 6. do_mq_timedsend::__pipelined_op() still believes `ewq_addr` is a `struct ext_wait_queue *`, and uses it to find a task_struct to pass to the wake_q_add_safe call. In the lucky case where nothing has overwritten `ewq_addr` yet, `ewq_addr->task` is the right task_struct. In the unlucky case, __pipelined_op::wake_q_add_safe gets handed a bogus address as the receiver's task_struct causing the crash. do_mq_timedsend::__pipelined_op() should not dereference `this` after setting STATE_READY, as the receiver counterpart is now free to return. Change __pipelined_op to call wake_q_add_safe on the receiver's task_struct returned by get_task_struct, instead of dereferencing `this` which sits on the receiver's stack. As Manfred pointed out, the race potentially also exists in ipc/msg.c::expunge_all and ipc/sem.c::wake_up_sem_queue_prepare. Fix those in the same way.

Why

The product uses, accesses, or otherwise operates on a resource after that resource has been expired, released, or revoked.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipc/mqueue, msg, sem: avoid relying on a stack reference past its expiry do_mq_timedreceive calls wq_sleep with a stack local address. The sender (do_mq_timedsend) uses this address to later call pipelined_send. This leads to a very hard to trigger race where a do_mq_timedreceive call might return and leave do_mq_timedsend to rely on an invalid address, causing the following crash: RIP: 0010:wake_q_add_safe+0x13/0x60 Call Trace: __x64_sys_mq_timedsend+0x2a9/0x490 do_syscall_64+0x80/0x680 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f5928e40343 The race occurs as: 1. do_mq_timedreceive calls wq_sleep with the address of `struct ext_wait_queue` on function stack (aliased as `ewq_addr` here) - it holds a valid `struct ext_wait_queue *` as long as the stack has not been overwritten. 2. `ewq_addr` gets added to info->e_wait_q[RECV].list in wq_add, and do_mq_timedsend receives it via wq_get_first_waiter(info, RECV) to call __pipelined_op. 3. Sender calls __pipelined_op::smp_store_release(&this->state, STATE_READY). Here is where the race window begins. (`this` is `ewq_addr`.) 4. If the receiver wakes up now in do_mq_timedreceive::wq_sleep, it will see `state == STATE_READY` and break. 5. do_mq_timedreceive returns, and `ewq_addr` is no longer guaranteed to be a `struct ext_wait_queue *` since it was on do_mq_timedreceive's stack. (Although the address may not get overwritten until another function happens to touch it, which means it can persist around for an indefinite time.) 6. do_mq_timedsend::__pipelined_op() still believes `ewq_addr` is a `struct ext_wait_queue *`, and uses it to find a task_struct to pass to the wake_q_add_safe call. In the lucky case where nothing has overwritten `ewq_addr` yet, `ewq_addr->task` is the right task_struct. In the unlucky case, __pipelined_op::wake_q_add_safe gets handed a bogus address as the receiver's task_struct causing the crash. do_mq_timedsend::__pipelined_op() should not dereference `this` after setting STATE_READY, as the receiver counterpart is now free to return. Change __pipelined_op to call wake_q_add_safe on the receiver's task_struct returned by get_task_struct, instead of dereferencing `this` which sits on the receiver's stack. As Manfred pointed out, the race potentially also exists in ipc/msg.c::expunge_all and ipc/sem.c::wake_up_sem_queue_prepare. Fix those in the same way.

Why

The product uses, accesses, or otherwise operates on a resource after that resource has been expired, released, or revoked.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-672 ↗

CWE-672: Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release. The product uses, accesses, or otherwise operates on a resource after that resource has been expired, released, or revoked.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-672
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1905IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, eine Man-in-the-Middle-Situation zu schaffen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder eine Denial-of-Service-Situation zu schaffen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0534Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder einen nicht spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240306Security Bulletin 06 Mar 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 Mar 2024, published on 6 March 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2021-41973 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42550 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43797 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44906 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46909 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46939 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46972 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47018 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47073 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47097 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47101 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47257 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47284 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47287 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0903Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2020-25219 Référence CVE CVE-2020-26137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26137 Référence CVE CVE-2020-26154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26154 Référence CVE CVE-2020-26555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26555 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7212 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42771 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45429 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46909 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46972 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47073 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47310 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47311 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47353 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47356 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47456 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0870Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

243569-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3585-1 du 10 octobre 2024 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243585-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3587-1 du 10 octobre 2024 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243587-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3591-1 du 10 octobre 2024 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243591-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:3592-1 du 10 octobre 2024 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243592-1 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4442 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47387 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47408 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47620 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47620 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47622 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0741Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Secure Analytics

d?id=CVE-2021-33198 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34558 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40153 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41072 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46909 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46934 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46972 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47013 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47055 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47073 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47118 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47153 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47171 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47185 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47310 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0720Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM QRadar SIEM

SIEM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7166204 du 22 août 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7166204 Référence CVE CVE-2020-26555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26555 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46909 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46972 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47073 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47310 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47311 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47353 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47356 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47456 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0718Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0577Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

4352 du 08 juillet 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4352 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:4412 du 09 juillet 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4412 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:4415 du 09 juillet 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4415 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:4447 du 10 juillet 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4447 Référence CVE CVE-2020-26555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26555 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46909 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46972 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47073 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47293 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47310 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47311 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47311 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47353 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47356 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0363Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2021-47049 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47051 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47055 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47056 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47058 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47061 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47063 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47065 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47068 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47070 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47071 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47073 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47077 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47082 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47083 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47087 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0265Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2021-46989 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46991 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46992 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47005 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47012 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47013 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47054 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47060 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47061 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47076 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47077 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47078 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47083 Référence CVE CVE-2022-20154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20154 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48627 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0461 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0242Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2021-46968 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46974 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46989 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47005 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47012 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47013 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47054 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47060 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47061 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47076 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47078 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47083 Référence CVE CVE-2022-20154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20154 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48627 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48628 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28746 Référence CVE CVE-2023-35827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-021546Linux の Linux Kernel における有効期限後または解放後のリソースの操作に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、有効期限後または解放後のリソースの操作に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: c5b2cbdbdac563f46ecd5e187253ab1abbd6fc04 < 4528c0c323085e645b8765913b4a7fd42cf49b65, c5b2cbdbdac563f46ecd5e187253ab1abbd6fc04 < 807fa14536b26803b858da878b643be72952a097, c5b2cbdbdac563f46ecd5e187253ab1abbd6fc04 < a11ddb37bf367e6b5239b95ca759e5389bb46048, 5.6
Fixed
Linux: < 5.6, 5.10.40 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.12.7 ≤ 5.12.*, 5.13 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Mar 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC · CWE-672 · Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-33717
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-47069 · cve.blacktree.nl