BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2021-46984High confidence

kyber: fix out of bounds access when preempted

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.26% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.10.38-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.10.38-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.10.38-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.10.38-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-33632

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kyber: fix out of bounds access when preempted __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge() gets the ctx and hctx for the current CPU and passes the hctx to ->bio_merge(). kyber_bio_merge() then gets the ctx for the current CPU again and uses that to get the corresponding Kyber context in the passed hctx. However, the thread may be preempted between the two calls to blk_mq_get_ctx(), and the ctx returned the second time may no longer correspond to the passed hctx. This "works" accidentally most of the time, but it can cause us to read garbage if the second ctx came from an hctx with more ctx's than the first one (i.e., if ctx->index_hw[hctx->type] > hctx->nr_ctx). This manifested as this UBSAN array index out of bounds error reported by Jakub: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:130:9 index 13106 is out of range for type 'long unsigned int [128]' Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa4/0xe5 ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold.13+0x2a/0x34 queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x476/0x480 do_raw_spin_lock+0x1c2/0x1d0 kyber_bio_merge+0x112/0x180 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x1f5/0x1100 submit_bio_noacct+0x7b0/0x870 submit_bio+0xc2/0x3a0 btrfs_map_bio+0x4f0/0x9d0 btrfs_submit_data_bio+0x24e/0x310 submit_one_bio+0x7f/0xb0 submit_extent_page+0xc4/0x440 __extent_writepage_io+0x2b8/0x5e0 __extent_writepage+0x28d/0x6e0 extent_write_cache_pages+0x4d7/0x7a0 extent_writepages+0xa2/0x110 do_writepages+0x8f/0x180 __writeback_single_inode+0x99/0x7f0 writeback_sb_inodes+0x34e/0x790 __writeback_inodes_wb+0x9e/0x120 wb_writeback+0x4d2/0x660 wb_workfn+0x64d/0xa10 process_one_work+0x53a/0xa80 worker_thread+0x69/0x5b0 kthread+0x20b/0x240 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Only Kyber uses the hctx, so fix it by passing the request_queue to ->bio_merge() instead. BFQ and mq-deadline just use that, and Kyber can map the queues itself to avoid the mismatch.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kyber: fix out of bounds access when preempted __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge() gets the ctx and hctx for the current CPU and passes the hctx to ->bio_merge(). kyber_bio_merge() then gets the ctx for the current CPU again and uses that to get the corresponding Kyber context in the passed hctx. However, the thread may be preempted between the two calls to blk_mq_get_ctx(), and the ctx returned the second time may no longer correspond to the passed hctx. This "works" accidentally most of the time, but it can cause us to read garbage if the second ctx came from an hctx with more ctx's than the first one (i.e., if ctx->index_hw[hctx->type] > hctx->nr_ctx). This manifested as this UBSAN array index out of bounds error reported by Jakub: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:130:9 index 13106 is out of range for type 'long unsigned int [128]' Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa4/0xe5 ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold.13+0x2a/0x34 queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x476/0x480 do_raw_spin_lock+0x1c2/0x1d0 kyber_bio_merge+0x112/0x180 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x1f5/0x1100 submit_bio_noacct+0x7b0/0x870 submit_bio+0xc2/0x3a0 btrfs_map_bio+0x4f0/0x9d0 btrfs_submit_data_bio+0x24e/0x310 submit_one_bio+0x7f/0xb0 submit_extent_page+0xc4/0x440 __extent_writepage_io+0x2b8/0x5e0 __extent_writepage+0x28d/0x6e0 extent_write_cache_pages+0x4d7/0x7a0 extent_writepages+0xa2/0x110 do_writepages+0x8f/0x180 __writeback_single_inode+0x99/0x7f0 writeback_sb_inodes+0x34e/0x790 __writeback_inodes_wb+0x9e/0x120 wb_writeback+0x4d2/0x660 wb_workfn+0x64d/0xa10 process_one_work+0x53a/0xa80 worker_thread+0x69/0x5b0 kthread+0x20b/0x240 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Only Kyber uses the hctx, so fix it by passing the request_queue to ->bio_merge() instead. BFQ and mq-deadline just use that, and Kyber can map the queues itself to avoid the mismatch.

Why

The product uses untrusted input when calculating or using an array index, but the product does not validate or incorrectly validates the index to ensure the index references a valid position within the array.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kyber: fix out of bounds access when preempted __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge() gets the ctx and hctx for the current CPU and passes the hctx to ->bio_merge(). kyber_bio_merge() then gets the ctx for the current CPU again and uses that to get the corresponding Kyber context in the passed hctx. However, the thread may be preempted between the two calls to blk_mq_get_ctx(), and the ctx returned the second time may no longer correspond to the passed hctx. This "works" accidentally most of the time, but it can cause us to read garbage if the second ctx came from an hctx with more ctx's than the first one (i.e., if ctx->index_hw[hctx->type] > hctx->nr_ctx). This manifested as this UBSAN array index out of bounds error reported by Jakub: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:130:9 index 13106 is out of range for type 'long unsigned int [128]' Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa4/0xe5 ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold.13+0x2a/0x34 queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x476/0x480 do_raw_spin_lock+0x1c2/0x1d0 kyber_bio_merge+0x112/0x180 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x1f5/0x1100 submit_bio_noacct+0x7b0/0x870 submit_bio+0xc2/0x3a0 btrfs_map_bio+0x4f0/0x9d0 btrfs_submit_data_bio+0x24e/0x310 submit_one_bio+0x7f/0xb0 submit_extent_page+0xc4/0x440 __extent_writepage_io+0x2b8/0x5e0 __extent_writepage+0x28d/0x6e0 extent_write_cache_pages+0x4d7/0x7a0 extent_writepages+0xa2/0x110 do_writepages+0x8f/0x180 __writeback_single_inode+0x99/0x7f0 writeback_sb_inodes+0x34e/0x790 __writeback_inodes_wb+0x9e/0x120 wb_writeback+0x4d2/0x660 wb_workfn+0x64d/0xa10 process_one_work+0x53a/0xa80 worker_thread+0x69/0x5b0 kthread+0x20b/0x240 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Only Kyber uses the hctx, so fix it by passing the request_queue to ->bio_merge() instead. BFQ and mq-deadline just use that, and Kyber can map the queues itself to avoid the mismatch.

Why

The product uses untrusted input when calculating or using an array index, but the product does not validate or incorrectly validates the index to ensure the index references a valid position within the array.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Validation of Array Index → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-129 ↗

CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index. The product uses untrusted input when calculating or using an array index, but the product does not validate or incorrectly validates the index to ensure the index references a valid position within the array.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-129
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0508Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240306Security Bulletin 06 Mar 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 Mar 2024, published on 6 March 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2021-41183 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41184 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41973 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42550 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43797 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44906 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46909 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46939 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46972 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47018 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47069 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47073 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47097 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47101 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47236 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47257 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39537 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3995 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3996 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44964 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46904 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46937 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47017 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47020 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47033 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47041 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47071 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47074 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

02502942-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:02943-1 du 21 août 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202502943-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:02944-1 du 21 août 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202502944-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:02945-1 du 21 août 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202502945-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:02955-1 du 21 août 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202502955-1 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11135 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46987 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4129 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49138 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49319 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49323 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49768 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0821Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

1 du 24 septembre 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:7001 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:7002 du 24 septembre 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:7002 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:7003 du 24 septembre 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:7003 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:7004 du 24 septembre 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:7004 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:7005 du 24 septembre 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:7005 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2024:7227 du 26 septembre 2024 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:7227 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47097 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47101 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47287 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47289 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47321 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47338 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47352 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0363Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2021-46960 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46961 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46962 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46963 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46971 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46976 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46980 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46981 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46983 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46988 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46990 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46991 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46992 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46998 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47000 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47001 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-021347Linux の Linux Kernel における配列インデックスの検証に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、配列インデックスの検証に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: a6088845c2bf754d6cb2572b484180680b037804 < 0b6b4b90b74c27bea968c214d820ba4254b903a5, a6088845c2bf754d6cb2572b484180680b037804 < 54dbe2d2c1fcabf650c7a8b747601da355cd7f9f, a6088845c2bf754d6cb2572b484180680b037804 < a287cd84e047045f5a4d4da793414e848de627c6, a6088845c2bf754d6cb2572b484180680b037804 < 2ef3c76540c49167a0bc3d5f80d00fd1fc4586df, a6088845c2bf754d6cb2572b484180680b037804 < efed9a3337e341bd0989161b97453b52567bc59d, 4.18
Fixed
Linux: < 4.18, 5.4.120 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.38 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.11.22 ≤ 5.11.*, 5.12.5 ≤ 5.12.*, 5.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 28 Feb 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC · CWE-129 · Improper Validation of Array Index

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-33632
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-46984 · cve.blacktree.nl