BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2021-43818High confidence

HTML Cleaner allows crafted and SVG embedded scripts to pass through

lxml · lxml

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-55X5-FJ6C-H6M8 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

8.2HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 2.48% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs lxml lxml and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainpy3-lxmlVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.4.6.5-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainpy3-lxmlVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.4.6.5-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainpy3-lxmlVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.4.6.5-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelxmlVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.7.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelxmlVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.7.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelxmlVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.7.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelxmlVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.7.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-0117

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

lxml is a library for processing XML and HTML in the Python language. Prior to version 4.6.5, the HTML Cleaner in lxml.html lets certain crafted script content pass through, as well as script content in SVG files embedded using data URIs. Users that employ the HTML cleaner in a security relevant context should upgrade to lxml 4.6.5 to receive a patch. There are no known workarounds available.

What

lxml is a library for processing XML and HTML in the Python language. Prior to version 4.6.5, the HTML Cleaner in lxml.html lets certain crafted script content pass through, as well as script content in SVG files embedded using data URIs. Users that employ the HTML cleaner in a security relevant context should upgrade to lxml 4.6.5 to receive a patch. There are no known workarounds available.

Why

The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

lxml is a library for processing XML and HTML in the Python language. Prior to version 4.6.5, the HTML Cleaner in lxml.html lets certain crafted script content pass through, as well as script content in SVG files embedded using data URIs. Users that employ the HTML cleaner in a security relevant context should upgrade to lxml 4.6.5 to receive a patch. There are no known workarounds available.

Why

The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-74 ↗

CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'). The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-74
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1086IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren, seine Privilegien zu erweitern, einen Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS)-Angriff durchzuführen oder einen nicht spezifizierten Angriff auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0432Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Verfügbarkeit und Integrität zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0302Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Ausführen von beliebigem Programmcode mit Administratorrechten

Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen oder Dateien zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0575Python: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Codeausführung

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Python ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20211215Security Bulletin 15 Dec 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 15 Dec 2021, published on 15 December 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0395Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

g/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33930 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33938 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3426 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3572 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3733 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3737 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4189 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42771 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43818 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44568 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46877 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1705 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2255 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42919 Référence CVE CVE-2022-45061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45061 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0506Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Secure Analytics

Record?id=CVE-2020-7656 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33631 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3753 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41043 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4204 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43818 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43975 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0500 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2127 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23222 Référence CVE CVE-2022-26377 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26377 Référence CVE CVE-2022-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2022-28388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28388 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0385Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

Record?id=CVE-2019-8696 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9740 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10001 Référence CVE CVE-2020-26137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26137 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27783 Référence CVE CVE-2020-3898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-3898 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33503 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33631 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43818 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43975 Référence CVE CVE-2022-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2022-28388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28388 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3545 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3594 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36402 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-20

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0262Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

cord?id=CVE-2019-1563 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10683 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10735 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1968 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25659 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27783 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28493 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36242 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28957 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43818 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2127 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25647 Référence CVE CVE-2022-26377 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26377 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36760 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40303 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40304 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4304 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-016260lxml におけるクロスサイトスクリプティングの脆弱性

lxml には、クロスサイトスクリプティングの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
lxml: < 4.6.5
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 13 Dec 2021 · Last source change 18 Dec 2025, 15:05 UTC · CWE-74 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-0117
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-43818 · cve.blacktree.nl