BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2021-43784High confidence

Overflow in netlink bytemsg length field allows attacker to override netlink-based container configuration

opencontainers · runc

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-V95C-P5HM-XQ8F ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

6.0MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 15 Oct 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 1.80% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs opencontainers runc and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · communityruncVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.0.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 11 Sep 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · communityruncVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.0.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 11 Sep 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · communityruncVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.0.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 19 Aug 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourceruncVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.0.3+ds1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceruncVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.0.3+ds1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceruncVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.0.3+ds1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceruncVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.0.3+ds1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-2591

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers on Linux according to the OCI specification. In runc, netlink is used internally as a serialization system for specifying the relevant container configuration to the `C` portion of the code (responsible for the based namespace setup of containers). In all versions of runc prior to 1.0.3, the encoder did not handle the possibility of an integer overflow in the 16-bit length field for the byte array attribute type, meaning that a large enough malicious byte array attribute could result in the length overflowing and the attribute contents being parsed as netlink messages for container configuration. This vulnerability requires the attacker to have some control over the configuration of the container and would allow the attacker to bypass the namespace restrictions of the container by simply adding their own netlink payload which disables all namespaces. The main users impacted are those who allow untrusted images with untrusted configurations to run on their machines (such as with shared cloud infrastructure). runc version 1.0.3 contains a fix for this bug. As a workaround, one may try disallowing untrusted namespace paths from your container. It should be noted that untrusted namespace paths would allow the attacker to disable namespace protections entirely even in the absence of this bug.

What

runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers on Linux according to the OCI specification. In runc, netlink is used internally as a serialization system for specifying the relevant container configuration to the `C` portion of the code (responsible for the based namespace setup of containers). In all versions of runc prior to 1.0.3, the encoder did not handle the possibility of an integer overflow in the 16-bit length field for the byte array attribute type, meaning that a large enough malicious byte array attribute could result in the length overflowing and the attribute contents being parsed as netlink messages for container configuration. This vulnerability requires the attacker to have some control over the configuration of the container and would allow the attacker to bypass the namespace restrictions of the container by simply adding their own netlink payload which disables all namespaces. The main users impacted are those who allow untrusted images with untrusted configurations to run on their machines (such as with shared cloud infrastructure). runc version 1.0.3 contains a fix for this bug. As a workaround, one may try disallowing untrusted namespace paths from your container. It should be noted that untrusted namespace paths would allow the attacker to disable namespace protections entirely even in the absence of this bug.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers on Linux according to the OCI specification. In runc, netlink is used internally as a serialization system for specifying the relevant container configuration to the `C` portion of the code (responsible for the based namespace setup of containers). In all versions of runc prior to 1.0.3, the encoder did not handle the possibility of an integer overflow in the 16-bit length field for the byte array attribute type, meaning that a large enough malicious byte array attribute could result in the length overflowing and the attribute contents being parsed as netlink messages for container configuration. This vulnerability requires the attacker to have some control over the configuration of the container and would allow the attacker to bypass the namespace restrictions of the container by simply adding their own netlink payload which disables all namespaces. The main users impacted are those who allow untrusted images with untrusted configurations to run on their machines (such as with shared cloud infrastructure). runc version 1.0.3 contains a fix for this bug. As a workaround, one may try disallowing untrusted namespace paths from your container. It should be noted that untrusted namespace paths would allow the attacker to disable namespace protections entirely even in the absence of this bug.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkCWE-190Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0510IBM DB2: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer, authentisierter oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DB2 ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen, willkürlichen Code mit erhöhten Rechten auszuführen, Informationen falsch darzustellen und beliebigen Code auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20211208Security Bulletin 08 Dec 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Dec 2021, published on 8 December 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0641Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

155 du 15 mai 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7273155 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7273156 du 15 mai 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7273156 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7273269 du 17 mai 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7273269 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7273281 du 18 mai 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7273281 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7273312 du 18 mai 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7273312 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7271877 du 19 mai 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7271877 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7273555 du 21 mai 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7273555 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43784 Référence CVE CVE-2023-47038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47038 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45310 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0590Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

id=CVE-2016-1000027 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19921 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13956 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32760 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35515 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35516 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35517 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36090 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41103 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43784 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43816 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23471 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23648 Référence CVE CVE-2022-27664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27664 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29162 Référence CVE CVE-2022-31030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31030 Référence CVE CVE-2022-32149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32149 Référence CVE CVE-2022-41721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0841Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36187 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36188 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36189 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36518 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8840 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9546 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9547 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20190 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43784 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34038 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42003 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42004 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25613 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3978 Référence CVE CVE-2023-41993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-41993 Référence CVE CVE-2023-50312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50312 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

=CVE-2018-18074 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1010083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1010083 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14322 Référence CVE CVE-2020-15366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15366 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25032 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28493 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28363 Référence CVE CVE-2021-30465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-30465 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43565 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43784 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45958 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23539 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23540 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23541 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29162 Référence CVE CVE-2022-31116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31116 Référence CVE CVE-2022-31117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31117 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0350Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7148847 du 19 avril 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7148847 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7149055 du 22 avril 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7149055 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7149195 du 23 avril 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7149195 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7149294 du 23 avril 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7149294 Référence CVE CVE-2017-11468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11468 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32760 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41103 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43784 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43816 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23471 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23648 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29162 Référence CVE CVE-2022-31030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31030 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42969 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2253 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-591Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4154 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4155 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4157 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41864 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4197 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4203 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42248 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42836 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43565 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43784 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44716 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44733 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44907 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45485 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45486 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0185 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0286 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-016007runc における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

runc には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
runc: < 1.0.3
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 Dec 2021 · Last source change 15 Oct 2024, 17:14 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-2591
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-43784 · cve.blacktree.nl