BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2021-42550High confidence

RCE from attacker with configuration edit priviledges through JNDI lookup

QOS.ch · logback

6.6MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 4 Aug 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 4.44% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs QOS.ch logback and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelogbackVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:1.2.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelogbackVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:1.2.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelogbackVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:1.2.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelogbackVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:1.2.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2021-42550 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitylogback: remote code execution through JNDI call from within its configuration file
4 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • logback-classic as a component of Red Hat BPM Suite 6
  • logback-classic as a component of Red Hat Integration Camel K 1
  • logback-classic as a component of Red Hat JBoss BRMS 6
  • logback-classic as a component of Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6
Summary
A flaw was found in the logback package. When using a specially-crafted configuration, this issue could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers.
Remediation
For Red Hat Satellite 6.11 see the following documentation for the release. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.11 The important instructions on how to upgrade are available below. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.11/html/upgrading_and_updating_red_hat_satellite
SSA-371761 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalSiemens ProductCERTSSA-371761: Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability in the Logback Component of SINEC NMS before V1.0.3
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SINEC NMS
Summary
In logback version 1.2.7 and prior versions, an attacker with the required privileges to edit configurations files could craft a malicious configuration allowing to execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers.
Remediation
Update to V1.0.3 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-2454

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In logback version 1.2.7 and prior versions, an attacker with the required privileges to edit configurations files could craft a malicious configuration allowing to execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers.

What

In logback version 1.2.7 and prior versions, an attacker with the required privileges to edit configurations files could craft a malicious configuration allowing to execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers.

Why

Attacker-influenced serialised data is reconstructed as trusted objects, which can invoke dangerous application behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

In logback version 1.2.7 and prior versions, an attacker with the required privileges to edit configurations files could craft a malicious configuration allowing to execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers.

Why

Attacker-influenced serialised data is reconstructed as trusted objects, which can invoke dangerous application behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Deserialization of Untrusted Data → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
High: elevated access is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-502 ↗

CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data. The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently ensuring that the resulting data will be valid.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRHighPrivileges required: The attacker needs elevated or administrative privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
NetworkRemote code executionCWE-502Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0180Dell Data Protection Advisor: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Data Protection Advisor ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen und nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe zu starten.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1461IBM Spectrum Protect: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Spectrum Protect ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Programmcode mit Administratorrechten auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1375JFrog Artifactory: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in JFrog Artifactory ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen und einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0607Red Hat FUSE: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer, authentisierter oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat FUSE ausnutzen, um vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten und Informationen zu manipulieren und seine Privilegien zu erweitern.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0063Juniper Junos Space: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer aus dem angrenzenden Netzwerk oder ein entfernter anonymer, authentisierter oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Juniper Junos Space ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen, beliebigen Code auszuführen und seine Privilegien zu erweitern.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0572Logback: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Codeausführung

Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Logback ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0519IBM Maximo Asset Management: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Maximo Asset Management ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20211222Security Bulletin 22 Dec 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Dec 2021, published on 22 December 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2021-36090 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37136 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37137 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37404 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38296 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41182 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41183 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41184 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41973 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42550 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43797 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44906 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46909 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46939 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46972 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47018 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0855Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper Networks

Record?id=CVE-2018-3831 Référence CVE CVE-2019-12900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12900 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11023 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22146 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3903 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40153 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4104 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41043 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41072 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42550 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44228 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44832 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45046 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45105 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47606 Référence CVE CVE-2022-24805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24805 Référence CVE CVE-2022-24806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24806 Référence CVE CVE-2022-24807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0661Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

ord?id=CVE-2020-36518 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20190 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21290 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21295 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21409 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23413 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37136 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37137 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4189 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42550 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0391 Référence CVE CVE-2022-24823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24823 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38398 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38648 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40146 Référence CVE CVE-2022-41704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41704 Référence CVE CVE-2022-41881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-916Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

rg/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3715 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3752 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37576 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3765 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4034 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4155 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4160 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41617 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42550 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42574 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42771 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43527 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45417 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45960 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46143 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0330 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-1001Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

novembre 2022 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-568428.html Bulletin de sécurité Siemens 570294 du 8 novembre 2022 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-570294.html Bulletin de sécurité Siemens 587547 du 8 novembre 2022 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-587547.html Bulletin de sécurité Siemens 787941 du 8 novembre 2022 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-787941.html Bulletin de sécurité Siemens 853037 du 8 novembre 2022 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-853037.html Référence CVE CVE-2002-20001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2002-20001 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42550 Référence CVE CVE-2022-30694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30694 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37886 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37887 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37888 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37889 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-008205logback における信頼できないデータのデシリアライゼーションに関する脆弱性

logback には、信頼できないデータのデシリアライゼーションに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5472Logback 보안 업데이트 권고

Logback에서 발생하는 원격코드실행 취약점(CVE-2021-42550)

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Dec 2021 · Last source change 4 Aug 2024, 03:38 UTC · CWE-502 · Deserialization of Untrusted Data

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-2454
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    unspecified < 1.2.9; unspecified < 1.3.0-alpha11 · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    unspecified < 1.2.9; unspecified < 1.3.0-alpha11 · Fixed: Update to V1.0.3 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-42550 · cve.blacktree.nl