BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2021-41771High confidence

ImportedSymbols in debug/macho (for Open or OpenFat) in Go before 1.16.10 and 1.17.x before 1.17.3 Accesses a Memory Location After the End of a Buffer, aka an out-of-bounds slice situation

Unknown · Unknown

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 4.70% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

3 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · communitygoVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.17.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 11 Sep 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · communitygoVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.17.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 11 Sep 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · communitygoVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.17.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 19 Aug 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2021-41771 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitygolang: debug/macho: invalid dynamic symbol table command can cause panic
22 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • cli as a component of OpenShift Serverless
  • knative-eventing as a component of OpenShift Serverless
  • golang-bin as a component of Red Hat Ceph Storage 2
  • golang-src as a component of Red Hat Ceph Storage 2
  • golang.src as a component of Red Hat Ceph Storage 2
  • grafana as a component of Red Hat Ceph Storage 2
  • grafana.src as a component of Red Hat Ceph Storage 2
  • golang-bin as a component of Red Hat Ceph Storage 3
  • golang-src as a component of Red Hat Ceph Storage 3
  • golang.src as a component of Red Hat Ceph Storage 3
  • grafana as a component of Red Hat Ceph Storage 3
  • grafana-container as a component of Red Hat Ceph Storage 3
Summary
An out of bounds read vulnerability was found in debug/macho of the Go standard library. When using the debug/macho standard library (stdlib) and malformed binaries are parsed using Open or OpenFat, it can cause golang to attempt to read outside of a slice (array) causing a panic when calling ImportedSymbols. An attacker can use this vulnerability to craft a file which causes an application using this library to crash resulting in a denial of service.
Remediation
For details about the Security fixes, see these Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform documentation: * Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.6: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.6/html/serverless/index * Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.7: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.7/html/serverless/index * Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.8: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.8/html/serverless/index * Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.9: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.9/html/serverless/index * Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.10: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.10/html/serverless/index
SSA-744259 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalSiemens ProductCERTSSA-744259: Golang Vulnerabilities in Brownfield Connectivity - Gateway before V1.10.1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • Brownfield Connectivity - Gateway
Summary
ImportedSymbols in debug/macho (for Open or OpenFat) in Go before 1.16.10 and 1.17.x before 1.17.3 Accesses a Memory Location After the End of a Buffer, aka an out-of-bounds slice situation.
Remediation
Update to V1.11 or later version Contact customer support to obtain the update
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-28779

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

ImportedSymbols in debug/macho (for Open or OpenFat) in Go before 1.16.10 and 1.17.x before 1.17.3 Accesses a Memory Location After the End of a Buffer, aka an out-of-bounds slice situation.

What

ImportedSymbols in debug/macho (for Open or OpenFat) in Go before 1.16.10 and 1.17.x before 1.17.3 Accesses a Memory Location After the End of a Buffer, aka an out-of-bounds slice situation.

Why

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

ImportedSymbols in debug/macho (for Open or OpenFat) in Go before 1.16.10 and 1.17.x before 1.17.3 Accesses a Memory Location After the End of a Buffer, aka an out-of-bounds slice situation.

Why

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-119 ↗

CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-119
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0794Dell ECS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell ECS ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Programmcode mit Administratorrechten auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-2229Splunk Splunk Enterprise: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, authentifizierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Splunk Splunk Enterprise ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen 'Denial of Service'-Zustand zu verursachen, seine Privilegien zu erweitern und weitere, nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1335Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Verfügbarkeit und Integrität des Systems zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1524IBM Spectrum Protect Plus: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Spectrum Protect Plus ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen, seine Privilegien zu erweitern, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen und beliebigen Code auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0971Red Hat OpenShift: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Serverless Client ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20211110Security Bulletin 10 Nov 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Nov 2021, published on 10 November 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0199Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ERecord?id=CVE-2021-37600 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38297 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38561 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39293 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3995 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3996 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41089 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41091 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4160 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41771 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41772 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42374 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42376 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42378 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42379 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42381 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42382 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

rg/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3941 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39537 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3995 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3996 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3997 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40211 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4048 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40812 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41771 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41772 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4189 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4214 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4217 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4219 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43527 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0145Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ERecord?id=CVE-2021-33198 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34558 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36221 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3711 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38297 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39293 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41190 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4160 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41771 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41772 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44716 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0778 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1292 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1705 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1962 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2068 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0976Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

cord?id=CVE-2021-3426 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36221 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3737 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37701 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37713 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38297 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39008 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39293 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41771 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41772 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4189 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42248 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42836 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44716 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0391 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1471 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-20

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0701Multiples vulnérabilités dans Splunk

ord?id=CVE-2021-36221 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36976 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3803 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38297 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38561 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39293 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41182 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41183 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41184 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41771 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41772 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43565 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44716 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44717 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1705 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1941 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1962 Référence CVE CVE-2022-22576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-20

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0121Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

] Siemens du 14 février 2023 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-847261.pdf Bulletin de sécurité [SCADA] Siemens du 14 février 2023 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-450613.pdf Bulletin de sécurité [SCADA] Siemens du 14 février 2023 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-252808.pdf Référence CVE CVE-2007-5846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-5846 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32936 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32938 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32948 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41771 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41772 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43336 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43391 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44716 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44717 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1292 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1343 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-624Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM MQ Operator et Queue manager

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans IBM MQ Operator et Queue manager. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une élévation de privilèges.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-097Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans IBM Spectrum Protect Plus. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, un déni de service et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-014767Go におけるバッファエラーの脆弱性

Go には、バッファエラーの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 8 Nov 2021 · Last source change 4 Aug 2024, 03:15 UTC · CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-28779
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: For details about the Security fixes, see these Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform documentation: * Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.6: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.6/html/serverless/index * Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.7: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.7/html/serverless/index * Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.8: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.8/html/serverless/index * Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.9: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.9/html/serverless/index * Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.10: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.10/html/serverless/index
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release recorded from official guidance
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-28779↗Red Hat Product Security security advisory↗Vendor advisory↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-41771 · cve.blacktree.nl