BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2021-3999High confidence

A flaw was found in glibc

Unknown · glibc

Official source article: Siemens SSA-398330 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 6 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.75% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown glibc and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 6 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourceglibcVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.33-4Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceglibcVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.33-4Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceglibcVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.33-4Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceglibcVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.33-4Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
A flaw was found in glibc. An off-by-one buffer overflow and underflow in getcwd() may lead to memory corruption when the size of the buffer is exactly 1. A local attacker who can control the input buffer and size passed to getcwd() in a setuid program could use this flaw to potentially execute arbitrary code and escalate their privileges on the system.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
SSA-831302 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 5 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-831302: Vulnerabilities in the BIOS of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP before V1.3.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - BIOS
Summary
A flaw was found in glibc. An off-by-one buffer overflow and underflow in getcwd() may lead to memory corruption when the size of the buffer is exactly 1. A local attacker who can control the input buffer and size passed to getcwd() in a setuid program could use this flaw to potentially execute arbitrary code and escalate their privileges on the system.
Remediation
Update to V1.3.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-27189

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 6 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A flaw was found in glibc. An off-by-one buffer overflow and underflow in getcwd() may lead to memory corruption when the size of the buffer is exactly 1. A local attacker who can control the input buffer and size passed to getcwd() in a setuid program could use this flaw to potentially execute arbitrary code and escalate their privileges on the system.

What

A flaw was found in glibc. An off-by-one buffer overflow and underflow in getcwd() may lead to memory corruption when the size of the buffer is exactly 1. A local attacker who can control the input buffer and size passed to getcwd() in a setuid program could use this flaw to potentially execute arbitrary code and escalate their privileges on the system.

Why

A product calculates or uses an incorrect maximum or minimum value that is 1 more, or 1 less, than the correct value.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

A flaw was found in glibc. An off-by-one buffer overflow and underflow in getcwd() may lead to memory corruption when the size of the buffer is exactly 1. A local attacker who can control the input buffer and size passed to getcwd() in a setuid program could use this flaw to potentially execute arbitrary code and escalate their privileges on the system.

Why

A product calculates or uses an incorrect maximum or minimum value that is 1 more, or 1 less, than the correct value.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
local access → Off-by-one Error → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-193 ↗

CWE-193: Off-by-one Error. A product calculates or uses an incorrect maximum or minimum value that is 1 more, or 1 less, than the correct value.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
Remote code executionCWE-193Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1432Siemens SIMATIC S7: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer aus dem angrenzenden Netzwerk oder ein entfernter, anonymer, authentisierter, physischer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Siemens SIMATIC S7 ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen, seine Privilegien zu erweitern und Daten zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1186IBM DB2 REST: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DB2 REST ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1206GNU libc: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in GNU libc ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen und seine Privilegien zu erweitern.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20220831Security Bulletin 31 Aug 2022

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 31 Aug 2022, published on 31 August 2022. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2021-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36770 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36976 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37972 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39537 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3998 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4214 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4217 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43396 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45078 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46174 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46195 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2021-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36222 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36690 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37600 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39537 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3995 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3996 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44964 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46904 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46937 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47017 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

g/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39212 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39293 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3933 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3941 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39537 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3995 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3996 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3997 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40211 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4048 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40812 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41771 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41772 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4189 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4214 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2021-35646 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35647 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35648 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35937 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35938 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35939 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3875 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4122 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4193 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44228 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44832 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45105 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46848 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-20

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0442Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-1015Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

g/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36690 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3733 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3737 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37600 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3826 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3997 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3998 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4122 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41617 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4189 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4209 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43396 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45960 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-202

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

ERecord?id=CVE-2021-27645 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28831 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3326 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33574 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33655 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3759 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3998 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4037 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42373 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42374 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42375 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42376 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42377 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42377 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42378 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-683Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM QRadar SIEM

llet 2022 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6607133 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 6607135 du 26 juillet 2022 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6607135 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 6607137 du 26 juillet 2022 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6607137 Référence CVE CVE-2017-9801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9801 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1294 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23177 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31566 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39088 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45960 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46143 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0261 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0359 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0361 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0392 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0778 Référence CVE CVE-2022-22822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-020229GNU Project の GNU C Library 他複数ベンダの製品における境界条件の判定に関する脆弱性

GNU Project の GNU C Library 他複数ベンダの製品には、境界条件の判定に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-030388GNU C Libraryにおける複数の脆弱性

GNUプロジェクトが提供するGNU C Libraryには、複数の脆弱性が存在します。 CVE-2021-3998 :本脆弱性は2022年8月に公開されたものです。 CVE-2021-3999 :本脆弱性は2022年8月に公開されたものです。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Aug 2022 · Last source change 2 Dec 2025, 20:54 UTC · CWE-193 · Off-by-one Error

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-27189
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    Fixed in glibc v2.31 and above. · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    Fixed in glibc v2.31 and above. · Fixed: Update to V3.1.5 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
  2. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-3999 · cve.blacktree.nl