BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2021-3759High confidence

A memory overflow vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel’s ipc functionality of the memcg subsystem, in the way a user calls the semget function multiple times, creating semaphores

Unknown · kernel

Official source article: Siemens SSA-794697 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 3 Aug 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.36% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown kernel and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.15.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.15.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.15.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.15.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2021-3759 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 46 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2021-3759
15 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
Summary
A memory overflow vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel's ipc functionality of the memcg subsystem, in the way a user calls the semget function multiple times, creating semaphores. This flaw allows a local user to starve the resources, causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-794697 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 9 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-794697: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP before V1.1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Summary
A memory overflow vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel’s ipc functionality of the memcg subsystem, in the way a user calls the semget function multiple times, creating semaphores. This flaw allows a local user to starve the resources, causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
Remediation
Update to V1.1 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-27032

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A memory overflow vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel’s ipc functionality of the memcg subsystem, in the way a user calls the semget function multiple times, creating semaphores. This flaw allows a local user to starve the resources, causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

What

A memory overflow vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel’s ipc functionality of the memcg subsystem, in the way a user calls the semget function multiple times, creating semaphores. This flaw allows a local user to starve the resources, causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

A memory overflow vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel’s ipc functionality of the memcg subsystem, in the way a user calls the semget function multiple times, creating semaphores. This flaw allows a local user to starve the resources, causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Uncontrolled Resource Consumption → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-400 ↗

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption. The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-400
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1432Siemens SIMATIC S7: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer aus dem angrenzenden Netzwerk oder ein entfernter, anonymer, authentisierter, physischer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Siemens SIMATIC S7 ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen, seine Privilegien zu erweitern und Daten zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1461IBM Spectrum Protect: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Spectrum Protect ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Programmcode mit Administratorrechten auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0219Linux Kernel: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20220824Security Bulletin 24 Aug 2022

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 24 Aug 2022, published on 24 August 2022. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

ord?id=CVE-2020-27618 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29562 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20269 Référence CVE CVE-2021-27645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27645 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28831 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3326 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33574 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33655 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35942 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3759 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3998 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4037 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42373 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42374 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42375 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-202

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-1127Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

s à 5.10.158-2~deb10u1 Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données. Solution Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Debian dla-3244 du 22 décembre 2022 https://www.debian.org/lts/security/2022/dla-3244 Bulletin de sécurité Debian dla-3245 du 22 décembre 2022 https://www.debian.org/lts/security/2022/dla-3245 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3759 Référence CVE CVE-2022-20369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20369 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29901 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3169 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3435 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3521 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3524 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-356

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-934Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3659 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3679 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3715 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37159 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3732 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3744 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3752 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3753 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37576 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3759 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3760 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3764 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3772 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38160 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38198 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38204 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40490 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-202

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-916Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3659 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3679 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3715 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37159 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3732 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3744 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3752 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3753 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37576 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3759 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3760 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3764 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3772 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38160 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38198 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38204 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40490 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-202

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-868Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, un déni de service et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-855Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, un déni de service et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-814Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, un déni de service à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-785Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3669 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3679 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3715 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3732 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3739 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3743 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3744 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3752 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3753 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3759 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3764 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38160 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38166 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38198 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38204 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38205 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38206 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-730Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35477 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3653 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3656 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3679 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3732 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3739 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3743 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3753 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3759 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38160 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38166 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38198 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38204 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38205 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38206 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38207 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-727Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35477 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3653 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3656 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3679 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3732 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3739 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3743 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3753 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3759 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38160 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38166 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38198 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38204 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38205 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38206 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38207 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-020306Linux の Linux Kernel 他複数ベンダの製品における制限またはスロットリング無しのリソースの割り当てに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 他複数ベンダの製品には、制限またはスロットリング無しのリソースの割り当てに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 23 Aug 2022 · Last source change 3 Aug 2024, 17:09 UTC · CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-27032
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Remediation guidance recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-27032↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗Siemens ProductCERT security advisory · Siemens SSA-794697↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-3759 · cve.blacktree.nl