BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2021-3712High confidence

Read buffer overruns processing ASN.1 strings

OpenSSL · OpenSSL

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019200 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.4HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 322 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 5 Oct 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 50.44% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs OpenSSL OpenSSL and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 322 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainopensslVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.1.1l-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainopensslVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.1.1l-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainopensslVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.1.1l-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourceopensslVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.1.1l-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceopensslVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.1.1l-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceopensslVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.1.1l-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceopensslVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.1.1l-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Open-source package ranges1 source-attributed range

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
rustopenssl-src< 111.16.0111.16.0GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 27 Apr 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

6 current
CVE-2021-3712 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityopenssl: Read buffer overruns processing ASN.1 strings
13 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • rhacm2/management-ingress-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2
  • openssl as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • openssl-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • openssl-perl as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • openssl-static as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • openssl.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • openssl098e as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • openssl098e.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • openssl098e as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • openssl098e.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • compat-openssl10 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • compat-openssl10.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Summary
It was found that openssl assumed ASN.1 strings to be NUL terminated. A malicious actor may be able to force an application into calling openssl function with a specially crafted, non-NUL terminated string to deliberately hit this bug, which may result in a crash of the application, causing a Denial of Service attack, or possibly, memory disclosure. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and system availability.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 For the update to take effect, all services linked to the OpenSSL library must be restarted, or the system rebooted.
SSA-019200 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019200: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SCALANCE W-700 IEEE 802.11n Devices Before V6.6.0
49 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AA0)
  • SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AB0)
  • SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AA0)
  • SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AB0)
  • SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AC0)
  • SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA0)
  • SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA6)
  • SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB0)
  • SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB6)
  • SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AA0)
  • SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AB0)
  • SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AA0)
Summary
ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).
Remediation
Update to V6.6.0 or later version
SSA-244969 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 12 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-244969: OpenSSL Vulnerability in Industrial Products
271 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • Industrial Edge - Machine Insight App
  • Industrial Edge - PROFINET IO Connector
  • RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU (6GK6108-4AM00-2BA2)
  • RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAM (6GK6108-4AM00-2DA2)
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512
Summary
ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).
Remediation
Update to V1.0 SP3 or later version
SSA-028723 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · finalSiemens ProductCERTSSA-028723: Multiple OpenSSL Vulnerabilities in BFCClient Before V2.17
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • BFCClient
Summary
ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).
Remediation
Update to V2.17 or later version. Contact customer support to obtain the update
ARUBA-PSA-2023-002 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 5 · finalHPE Aruba NetworkingAuthenticated Read Buffer Overruns Processing ASN.1 Strings in ArubaOS
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SD-Branch 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.x
  • AOS-Wi-Fi Controllers and Campus/Remote Access Points
Summary
A vulnerability exists which allows an authenticated attacker to access sensitive information via the ArubaOS web-based management interface. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to gain access to some data in a cleartext format exposing other network infrastructure to further compromise.
Remediation
PLEASE NOTE - To fully patch all the vulnerabilities disclosed above customers must upgrade to the following versions: - AOS-8.10.x.x: 8.10.0.5 and above - AOS-8.11.x.x: 8.11.0.0 and above - AOS-10.3.x.x: 10.3.1.1 and above - SD-Branch 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.x: 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9 and above Customers who choose to implement the workarounds listed in the Workaround section below should note that all other vulnerabilities listed in this document are addressed by the following versions: - AOS-8.6.x.x: 8.6.0.20 and above - please note that not all issues are fixed in 8.6.x.x. See the Details section above for specific information - AOS-8.10.x.x: 8.10.0.5 and above - AOS-8.11.x.x: 8.11.0.0 and above - AOS-10.3.x.x: 10.3.1.1 and above - SD-Branch 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.x: 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9 and above NOTE: At the time of publishing of this Revision-4 of the Security Advisory, following AOS software release trains their End of Maintenance (EoM) milestone: - AOS-8.6.x.x : all - AOS-8.11.x.x : all - AOS-10.3.x.x : all - AOS-10.5.x.x : all - AOS 10.6.x.x : all - SD-Branch 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.x : all Software versions with resolution/fixes for the vulnerabilities covered above can be downloaded from the HPE Networking Support Portal. https://networkingsupport.hpe.com/home/ HPE Aruba Networking does not evaluate or patch AOS branches that have reached their End of Maintenance (EoM) milestone. For Software Release End of Life information, visit: https://networkingsupport.hpe.com/notifications;notificationPageSize=100 ;notificationSortBy=announcementDate;notificationSortDir=desc;notificationCategory=Software%20Release%20End%20of%20Life;
SSA-389290 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalSiemens ProductCERTSSA-389290: Third-Party Component Vulnerabilities in SINEC INS
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SINEC INS
Summary
ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).
Remediation
Update to V1.0.1.1 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-4935

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 322 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).

What

ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Out-of-bounds Read → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0180Dell Data Protection Advisor: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Data Protection Advisor ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen und nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe zu starten.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2366Oracle Hyperion: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Hyperion ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1186IBM DB2 REST: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DB2 REST ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0794Dell ECS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell ECS ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Programmcode mit Administratorrechten auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0530Aruba ArubaOS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Aruba ArubaOS ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, Code zur Ausführung zu bringen, einen Cross Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Denial of Service zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0400OpenSSL: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1030Oracle Siebel CRM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Siebel CRM ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0602IBM Security Verify Access: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer, authentisierter oder lokaler Angreifer oder ein Angreifer aus dem angrenzenden Netzwerk kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Security Verify Access ausnutzen, um einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, seine Privilegien zu erweitern, Informationen zu manipulieren, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen und Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV21-627IBM security advisory

Between 6 and 12 December 2021 IBM published Security Bulletins to address vulnerabilities in multiple products. Included were critical updates for the following: IBM App Connect Enterprise https://www.ibm.com/blogs/psirt/security-bulletin-ibm-app-connect-enterprise-v11-is-affected-by-vulnerabilities-in-node-js-cve-2021-23358-3/

Official advisory ↗
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV21-569IBM security advisory

Between 1 and 7 November 2021 IBM published Security Bulletins to address vulnerabilities in multiple products. Included were critical updates for the following: IBM WIoTP MessageGateway

Official advisory ↗
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV21-535IBM security advisory

Between 18 and 24 October 2021 IBM published Security Bulletins to address vulnerabilities in multiple products. Included were critical updates for the following: IBM Watson Explorer Deep Analytics Edition Foundational Components https://www.ibm.com/blogs/psirt/security-bulletin-vulnerabilities-affect-watson-explorer-foundational-components-cve-2021-3712-cve-2021-3711/

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20210825Security Bulletin 25 Aug 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 25 Aug 2021, published on 25 August 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0432Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0199Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2021-22923 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22925 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22926 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22946 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22947 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23840 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23841 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3449 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3711 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37600 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38297 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38561 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39293 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3995 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3996 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41089 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0442Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0180Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2021-35560 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35564 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35565 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35578 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35586 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35588 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35603 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3572 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3711 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41035 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4160 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43138 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44906 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0778 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1471 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2097 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0145Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2021-31525 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33194 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33195 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33196 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33197 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33198 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34558 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36221 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3711 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38297 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39293 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41190 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4160 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41771 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41772 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44716 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0214Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité IBM 6828527 du 10 mars 2023 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6828527 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 6962773 du 10 mars 2023 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6962773 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 6962775 du 10 mars 2023 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6962775 Référence CVE CVE-2020-4051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4051 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29425 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3711 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3733 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3737 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4160 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43138 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0391 Référence CVE CVE-2022-24758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24758 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25881 Référence CVE CVE-2022-34339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0178Multiples vulnérabilités dans Aruba ArubaOS

6.x.x à 8.10.x.x antérieures à 8.10.0.5 SD-WAN versions 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.x antérieures à 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9 Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Aruba ArubaOS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données. Solution Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Aruba ARUBA-PSA-2023-002 du 28 février 2023 https://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2023-002.txt Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22747 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22748 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22749 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22750 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22751 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22752 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22753 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0051Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

ERecord?id=CVE-2021-35565 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35567 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35567 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35578 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35586 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35603 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3564 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3573 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35940 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3621 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3715 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3752 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37576 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3765 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39275 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4028 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-928Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2021-23337 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23450 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29425 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3177 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32803 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32804 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33502 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34538 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3711 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3733 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3737 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3765 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37701 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37713 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3807 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-916Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

g/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35578 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35586 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35588 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35603 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3564 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3573 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3653 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3656 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3711 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3715 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3752 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37576 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3765 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4034 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4155 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-416

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-650Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

d?id=CVE-2021-35561 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35564 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35565 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35567 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35567 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35578 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35586 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35588 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35603 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36690 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41617 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42574 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42739 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21245 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21270 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21303 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-597Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans IBM Spectrum Protect Plus. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-570Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

VERecord?id=CVE-2016-5397 Référence CVE CVE-2018-11798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-11798 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1320 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0205 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0210 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13949 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22945 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22946 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22947 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44228 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45046 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45105 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0778 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1292 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1343 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-429Multiples vulnérabilités dans Nessus Network Monitor

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Nessus Network Monitor. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-239Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2021-23222 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23727 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29678 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3139 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3156 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33026 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35517 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35578 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36090 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38926 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38931 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38951 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39002 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4034 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41182 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41183 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-216Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32944 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32946 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32948 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32950 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32952 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3449 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3450 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3672 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3711 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37208 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37209 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37701 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37713 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39134 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39135 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-171Multiples vulnérabilités dans les commutateurs Aruba AOS-CX

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les commutateurs Aruba AOS-CX. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-124Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26146 Référence CVE CVE-2020-26147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26147 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28400 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8670 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8703 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8704 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20093 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20094 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3449 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37185 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37186 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37194 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37195 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37196 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37197 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37198 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-052Multiples vulnérabilités dans Oracle MySQL

nérabilités ont été découvertes dans Oracle MySQL. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, une exécution de code arbitraire et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données. Solution Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Oracle cpujan2022.html du 18 janvier 2022 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html#AppendixMSQL Référence CVE CVE-2021-22946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22946 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3634 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21245 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21249 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21253 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21254 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21256 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21264 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21265 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-053Multiples vulnérabilités dans Oracle PeopleSoft

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Oracle PeopleSoft. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-006Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Tenable

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Tenable. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à l'intégrité des données et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-943Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2021-33909 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34558 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35065 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35515 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35516 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35517 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36090 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36221 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3711 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3715 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37712 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37713 Référence CVE CVE-2021-38947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38947 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39052 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39053 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39054 Référence CVE CVE-2021-39058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-932Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-885Multiples vulnérabilités dans Stormshield Management Center

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Stormshield Management Center. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-801Multiples vulnérabilités dans Oracle MySQL

ord?id=CVE-2021-35642 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35643 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35644 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35645 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35646 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35647 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35648 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36222 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3711 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3712 Gestion détaillée du document le 20 octobre 2021 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-747Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Synology

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Synology. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance et un déni de service à distance. A la date de rédaction de l'avis, les vulnérabilités affectant le produit DiskStation Manager ne disposent pas encore d'un identifiant CVE.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-729Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Tenable. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-656Multiples vulnérabilités dans OpenSSL

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans OpenSSL. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-002326OpenSSL に複数の脆弱性

OpenSSL Project より、 OpenSSL Security Advisory [24 August 2021] が公開されました。 OpenSSL には、次の脆弱性が存在します。 深刻度 - 高(Severity: High)  * SM2 暗号データの復号処理におけるバッファオーバーフロー (CWE-120)- CVE-2021-3711   * SM2 暗号データの復号処理を行うアプリケーションは、EVP_PKEY_decrypt() 関数を通常 2 回呼び出すが、1 回目の呼び出しで計算されるバッファサイズが 2 回目の呼び出しで必要なサイズより小さくなるような SM2 データがアプリケーションに渡された場合、バッファオーバーフローが発生する可能性がある    深刻度 - 中(Severity: Moderate)  * ASN.1 文字列処理におけるバッファエラー (CWE-119)- CVE-2021-3712   * OpenSSL において、ASN.1 形式の文字列は ASN1_STRING 構造で表され、その構造では NULL 終端が必須とはされていない。しかし、OpenSSL 内には NULL 終端を前提として処理を行う関数が複数存在するため、アプリケーション内で直接生成されるなどした NULL 終端を持たない ASN1_STRING 構造文字列を処理させられた場合、バッファエラーが発生する可能性がある

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5361OpenSSL 취약점 보안 업데이트 권고

#### OpenSSL 취약점 보안 업데이트 권고 2021.08.25 ##### □ 개요 o OpenSSL에서 발생하는 취약점을 해결한 보안 업데이트 발표 o 낮은 버전 사용자는 서비스 거부 공격에 취약하므로, 최신 버전으로 업데이트 권고 ##### □ 설명 [1] o OpenSSL에서 버퍼오버플로우로 인해 발생하는 서비스거부 취약점(CVE-2021-3711) o OpenSSL에서 발생하는 정보노출 및 서비스거부 취약점(CVE-2021-3712) ##### □ 영향받는 버전 o OpenSSL 1.1.1k 및 이전 버전 ##### □ 해결 방안 o 취약점이 해결된 버전(OpenSSL 1.1.1l 이상)으로 업데이트 적용 ##### □ 기타 문의사항 o 한국인터넷진흥원 사이버민원센터: 국번없이 118 [참고사이트] [1] https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210824.txt ##### □ 작성 : 침해사고분석단 취약점분석팀

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2024-0239Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Solarwinds Platform

Een kwaadwillende kan de kwetsbaarheden misbruiken om een Denial-of-Service te veroorzaken, een command-injection uit te voeren, of om een Cross-Site-Scripting-aanval uit te voeren. Een dergelijke aanval kan leiden tot uitvoer van willekeurige code in de browser van het slachtoffer. Voor succesvol misbruik moet de kwaadwillende voorafgaande authenticatie hebben.

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0112Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten

Multiple OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1l and 1.0.2za contain buffer overrun and memory disclosure vulnerabilities in ASN.1 string processing, affecting various products including Oracle Siebel CRM, Oracle Communications, NetApp, HPE, and Solarwinds, with CVSS scores up to 7.4.

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0336Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Oracle Hyperion

OpenSSL and various Oracle products exhibit vulnerabilities related to ASN.1 string processing and unauthorized access, with specific versions addressing critical security issues and CVSS scores indicating significant risk.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Aug 2021 · Last source change 16 Apr 2026, 14:11 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-4935
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k); Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y) · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k); Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y) · Fixed: Update to V6.6.0 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-3712 · cve.blacktree.nl