BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2021-33430High confidence

n/a — Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Unknown · Unknown

5.3MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 3 Aug 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 1.07% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcenumpyVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:1.21.4-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcenumpyVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:1.21.4-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcenumpyVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:1.21.4-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcenumpyVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:1.21.4-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-0150

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

A Buffer Overflow vulnerability exists in NumPy 1.9.x in the PyArray_NewFromDescr_int function of ctors.c when specifying arrays of large dimensions (over 32) from Python code, which could let a malicious user cause a Denial of Service. NOTE: The vendor does not agree this is a vulneraility; In (very limited) circumstances a user may be able provoke the buffer overflow, the user is most likely already privileged to at least provoke denial of service by exhausting memory. Triggering this further requires the use of uncommon API (complicated structured dtypes), which is very unlikely to be available to an unprivileged user

What

A Buffer Overflow vulnerability exists in NumPy 1.9.x in the PyArray_NewFromDescr_int function of ctors.c when specifying arrays of large dimensions (over 32) from Python code, which could let a malicious user cause a Denial of Service. NOTE: The vendor does not agree this is a vulneraility; In (very limited) circumstances a user may be able provoke the buffer overflow, the user is most likely already privileged to at least provoke denial of service by exhausting memory. Triggering this further requires the use of uncommon API (complicated structured dtypes), which is very unlikely to be available to an unprivileged user

Why

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

A Buffer Overflow vulnerability exists in NumPy 1.9.x in the PyArray_NewFromDescr_int function of ctors.c when specifying arrays of large dimensions (over 32) from Python code, which could let a malicious user cause a Denial of Service. NOTE: The vendor does not agree this is a vulneraility; In (very limited) circumstances a user may be able provoke the buffer overflow, the user is most likely already privileged to at least provoke denial of service by exhausting memory. Triggering this further requires the use of uncommon API (complicated structured dtypes), which is very unlikely to be available to an unprivileged user

Why

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-120 ↗

CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'). The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkDenial of serviceCWE-120Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0432Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Verfügbarkeit und Integrität zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0302Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Ausführen von beliebigem Programmcode mit Administratorrechten

Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen oder Dateien zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0250Red Hat OpenStack: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenStack ausnutzen, um vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen und einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20211222Security Bulletin 22 Dec 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Dec 2021, published on 22 December 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0585Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

/0/35934 Bulletin de sécurité VMware 35935 du 11 juillet 2025 https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/35935 Référence CVE CVE-2015-1197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-1197 Référence CVE CVE-2017-1000383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000383 Référence CVE CVE-2017-6519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6519 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12413 Référence CVE CVE-2021-25317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25317 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31535 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33430 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34141 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3927 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3928 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3968 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3973 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3974 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4136 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4166

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0524Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

d?id=CVE-2020-18494 Référence CVE CVE-2021-26220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26220 Référence CVE CVE-2021-26221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26221 Référence CVE CVE-2021-26222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26222 Référence CVE CVE-2021-30485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-30485 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31229 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31347 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31348 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31598 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33430 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34141 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37501 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45829 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45830 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45832 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45833 Référence CVE CVE-2021-45943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45943 Référence CVE CVE-2021-46242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-016460NumPy における古典的バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性

** 未確定 ** 本件は、脆弱性として確定していません。 NumPy には、古典的バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性に対して異議を唱えています。 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33430

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
n/a
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 17 Dec 2021 · Last source change 3 Aug 2024, 23:50 UTC · CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-0150
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-33430 · cve.blacktree.nl