BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2021-28165High confidence

In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame

The Eclipse Foundation · Eclipse Jetty

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-26VR-8J45-3R4W ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 27 Aug 2025

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 53.86% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs The Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Jetty and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcejetty9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.9.4.39-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcejetty9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.9.4.39-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcejetty9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.9.4.39-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcejetty9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.9.4.39-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-0735

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame.

What

In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame.

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame.

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Uncontrolled Resource Consumption → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-400 ↗

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption. The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-400Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2372Oracle Siebel CRM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Siebel CRM ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0794Dell ECS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell ECS ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Programmcode mit Administratorrechten auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen, Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-2993Atlassian Bamboo, Atlassian Bitbucket, Atlassian Confluence and Atlassian Jira Software: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Atlassian Bamboo, Atlassian Bitbucket, Atlassian Confluence und Atlassian Jira Software ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-2674Oracle Fusion Middleware: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Fusion Middleware ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0227IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, Administratorrechte zu erlangen, beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Dateien zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1365Eclipse Jetty: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, authentisierter oder anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Eclipse Jetty ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen und einen Denial of Service Zustand auszulösen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20210407Security Bulletin 07 Apr 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 07 Apr 2021, published on 7 April 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0627Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36189 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36242 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36518 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8840 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9546 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9547 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20190 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23358 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28165 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35515 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35516 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35517 Référence CVE CVE-2021-36090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36090 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37136 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37137 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23491 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0357Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM Cognos

d?id=CVE-2018-12536 Référence CVE CVE-2018-12545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12545 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10241 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10247 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11358 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11022 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11023 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27218 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27223 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28165 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28169 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29425 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34428 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37533 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2047 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2048 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-916Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

d?id=CVE-2021-20265 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20271 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22543 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22555 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23840 Référence CVE CVE-2021-25220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25220 Référence CVE CVE-2021-27363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27363 Référence CVE CVE-2021-27364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27364 Référence CVE CVE-2021-27365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27365 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28165 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29154 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29650 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31535 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3177 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32399 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3347 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35550 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-767Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2020-25658 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28463 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7598 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7720 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20180 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22060 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23386 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28163 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28164 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28165 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28169 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34141 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34428 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34429 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3533 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3677 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4083 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-20

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-551Multiples vulnérabilités dans Zimbra

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Zimbra. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-523Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-912Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM Qradar

ERecord?id=CVE-2020-13954 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1971 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27777 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7226 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9492 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22555 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22696 Référence CVE CVE-2021-27219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27219 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28163 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28165 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28169 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29154 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29425 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29650 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32027 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32028 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32399 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-005061Eclipse Jetty における例外的な状態の処理に関する脆弱性

Eclipse Jetty には、例外的な状態の処理に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-005167Eclipse Jetty における脆弱性

Eclipse Jetty には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2024-0231Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Atlassian producten

Een kwaadwillende kan de kwetsbaarheden misbruiken om aanvallen uit te voeren die kunnen leiden tot de volgende categorieën schade: - Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) - Denial-of-Service (DoS) - Omzeilen van authenticatie - (Remote) code execution (Administrator/Root rechten) - (Remote) code execution (Gebruikersrechten) - SQL Injection - Toegang tot systeemgegevens

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Eclipse Jetty: 7.2.2 < unspecified, unspecified ≤ 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 < unspecified, unspecified ≤ 10.0.1, 11.0.0.alpha0 < unspecified, unspecified ≤ 11.0.1
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Apr 2021 · Last source change 27 Aug 2025, 20:37 UTC · CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-0735
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-28165 · cve.blacktree.nl