BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2021-25220High confidence

DNS forwarders - cache poisoning vulnerability

ISC · BIND

6.8MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 3.36% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs ISC BIND and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainbindVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.9.16.27-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainbindVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.9.16.27-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainbindVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.9.16.27-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcebind9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9.18.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcebind9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9.18.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcebind9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9.18.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcebind9Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9.18.1-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
2NGA002579 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalABB Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT)CVE-2021-25220
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • ABB M2M Gateway ARM600, firmware versions >=4.1.2|<=5.0.3
  • ABB M2M Gateway SW, software versions >=5.0.1|<=5.0.3
Summary
When using forwarders, bogus NS records supplied by, or via, those forwarders may be cached and used by named if it needs to recurse for any reason, causing it to obtain and pass on potentially incor-rect answers. This could cause DNS cache poisoning that could potentially lead to a denial of service and information disclosure by an authenticated attacker.
Remediation
Mitigating factors describe conditions and circumstances that make an attack that exploits the vulnerability difficult or less likely to succeed. The following mitigations are recommended. 3. ARM600 system is by default not dependent on the name service (DNS). If name service is not used in the system, the name service port (TCP/UDP port 53) can be blocked by a firewall. Refer to section General security recommendations for additional advice on how to keep your system secure.
SSA-637483 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalSiemens ProductCERTSSA-637483 Third-Party Component Vulnerabilities in SINEC INS before V1.0 SP2
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SINEC INS
Summary
BIND 9.11.0 -> 9.11.36 9.12.0 -> 9.16.26 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 BIND Supported Preview Editions: 9.11.4-S1 -> 9.11.36-S1 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.26-S1 Versions of BIND 9 earlier than those shown - back to 9.1.0, including Supported Preview Editions - are also believed to be affected but have not been tested as they are EOL. The cache could become poisoned with incorrect records leading to queries being made to the wrong servers, which might also result in false information being returned to clients.
Remediation
Update to V1.0 SP2 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-12131

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

BIND 9.11.0 -> 9.11.36 9.12.0 -> 9.16.26 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 BIND Supported Preview Editions: 9.11.4-S1 -> 9.11.36-S1 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.26-S1 Versions of BIND 9 earlier than those shown - back to 9.1.0, including Supported Preview Editions - are also believed to be affected but have not been tested as they are EOL. The cache could become poisoned with incorrect records leading to queries being made to the wrong servers, which might also result in false information being returned to clients.

What

BIND 9.11.0 -> 9.11.36 9.12.0 -> 9.16.26 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 BIND Supported Preview Editions: 9.11.4-S1 -> 9.11.36-S1 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.26-S1 Versions of BIND 9 earlier than those shown - back to 9.1.0, including Supported Preview Editions - are also believed to be affected but have not been tested as they are EOL. The cache could become poisoned with incorrect records leading to queries being made to the wrong servers, which might also result in false information being returned to clients.

Why

The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

BIND 9.11.0 -> 9.11.36 9.12.0 -> 9.16.26 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 BIND Supported Preview Editions: 9.11.4-S1 -> 9.11.36-S1 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.26-S1 Versions of BIND 9 earlier than those shown - back to 9.1.0, including Supported Preview Editions - are also believed to be affected but have not been tested as they are EOL. The cache could become poisoned with incorrect records leading to queries being made to the wrong servers, which might also result in false information being returned to clients.

Why

The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
High: elevated access is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-444 ↗

CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling'). The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRHighPrivileges required: The attacker needs elevated or administrative privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkCWE-444
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1307Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh Containers: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh Containers ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, einen 'Denial of Service'-Zustand erzuegen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1226Red Hat OpenShift: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, seine Privilegien zu erweitern oder um weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0064Juniper Produkte: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer aus dem angrenzenden Netzwerk oder ein entfernter, anonymer, authentisierter, lokaler oder physischer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Juniper JUNOS, Juniper JUNOS Evolved, Juniper SRX Series, Juniper EX Series, Juniper QFX Series, Juniper ACX Series, Juniper PTX Series und Juniper MX Series ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und seine Berechtigungen zu erweitern.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1812Oracle Communications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Communications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1737Juniper Patchday Juli 2023

Ein Angreifer aus dem angrenzenden Netzwerk oder ein entfernter anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in verschiedenen Juniper Produkten ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen und seine Privilegien zu erweitern.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0809IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Informationen falsch darzustellen, einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen, Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen oder unbekannte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1335Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Verfügbarkeit und Integrität des Systems zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0969Internet Systems Consortium BIND: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Internet Systems Consortium BIND ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20220330Security Bulletin 30 Mar 2022

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Mar 2022, published on 30 March 2022. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2437 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2440 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2441 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2444 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2478 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2479 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2481 Référence CVE CVE-2021-25214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25214 Référence CVE CVE-2021-25219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25219 Référence CVE CVE-2021-25220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25220 Référence CVE CVE-2021-27645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27645 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32256 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3236 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3326 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33294 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33574 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3421 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-202

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0027Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper Networks

es-memory-leak-CVE-2024-21617 Référence CVE CVE-2016-10009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-10009 Référence CVE CVE-2016-2183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2183 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17571 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0465 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0466 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12321 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9493 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0920 Référence CVE CVE-2021-25220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25220 Référence CVE CVE-2021-26341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26341 Référence CVE CVE-2021-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33655 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33656 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34798 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3564 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3573 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0537Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

ord?id=CVE-2020-13817 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13946 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7071 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21703 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21704 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21705 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21707 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21708 Référence CVE CVE-2021-25220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25220 Référence CVE CVE-2021-26401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26401 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40085 Référence CVE CVE-2022-23825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23825 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2588 Référence CVE CVE-2022-26373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26373 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2795 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2964 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-20

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2021-21290 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21295 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21409 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23343 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23362 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23364 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23368 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23382 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23450 Référence CVE CVE-2021-25220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25220 Référence CVE CVE-2021-26401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26401 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29060 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32803 Référence CVE CVE-2021-32804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32804 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3677 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37136 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37137 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-916Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

SRX-Series-If-Unified-Threat-Management-UTM-Enhanced-Content-Filtering-CF-is-enabled-and-specific-traffic-is-processed-the-PFE-will-crash-CVE-2022-22232 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper JSA69887 du 12 octobre 2022 https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2022-10-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-and-Junos-OS-Evolved-In-an-SR-to-LDP-interworking-scenario-with-SRMS-when-a-specific-low-privileged-command-is-issued-on-an-ABR-rpd-will-crash-CVE-2022-22233 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper JSA69888 du 12 octobre 2022 https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2022-10-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-SRX-Series-Cache-poisoning-vulnerability-in-BIND-used-by-DNS-Proxy-CVE-2021-25220 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper JSA69889 du 12 octobre 2022 https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2022-10-Security-Bulletin-Session-Smart-Router-Multiple-vulnerabilities-resolved Bulletin de sécurité Juniper JSA69890 du 12 octobre 2022 https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2022-10-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-EX2300-and-EX3400-Series-One-of-more-SFPs-might-become-unavailable-when-the-system-is-very-busy-CVE-2022-22234 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper JSA69891 du 12 octobre 2022 https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/2022-10-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-SRX-Series-A-flowd-core-will-be-observed-when-malformed-GPRS-traffic-is-processed-CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-814Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits SIEMENS

cord?id=CVE-2016-0701 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12762 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28168 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28500 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7793 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23337 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23839 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23841 Référence CVE CVE-2021-25217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25217 Référence CVE CVE-2021-25220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25220 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3749 Référence CVE CVE-2021-4160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4160 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0155 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0235 Référence CVE CVE-2022-0396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0396 Référence CVE CVE-2022-37011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37011 Référence CVE CVE-2022-38466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38466 Référence CVE CVE-2022-39137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-254Multiples vulnérabilités dans ISC BIND

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans ISC BIND. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-001797BIND におけるキャッシュが誤ったレコードで汚染される脆弱性

BIND には、キャッシュが誤ったレコードで汚染され、間違ったサーバに対してクエリが実行される脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5543BIND DNS 취약점 보안 업데이트 권고

Cache 정보 위/변조로 인해 발생하는 서비스 거부 취약점(CVE-2021-25220) [1]

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Mitigating factors describe conditions and circumstances that make an attack that exploits the vulnerability difficult or less likely to succeed. The following mitigations are recommended. 3. ARM600 system is by default not dependent on the name service (DNS). If name service is not used in the system, the name service port (TCP/UDP port 53) can be blocked by a firewall. Refer to section General security recommendations for additional advice on how to keep your system secure.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 23 Mar 2022 · Last source change 16 Sept 2024, 17:08 UTC · CWE-444 · Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-12131
Product sourceVendor CSAF · ABB Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT)
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · ABB Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT)
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added remediation: search.abb.com/Download.aspx?DocumentID=2NGA002579&LanguageCode=en&DocumentPartId=pdf&Action=Launch; removed remediation: nvd.nist.gov/CVE-2021-25220.
    Before
    remediation: nvd.nist.gov/CVE-2021-25220
    After
    remediation: search.abb.com/Download.aspx?DocumentID=2NGA002579&LanguageCode=en&DocumentPartId=pdf&Action=Launch
    ABB Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) ↗
  2. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Patch available to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Patch available
    After
    Mitigation available
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-25220 · cve.blacktree.nl