Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Published severityMedium→Operational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 16 Sep 2024
Evidence used
No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
EPSS is 1.72% for the current model date.
Compensating controls
Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.
Verification
Confirm that the asset runs Unknown mpath and falls inside the recorded affected range.
Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Optional official sources
National CERT insights ?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.
Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.
Official European source
ENISA European Vulnerability Database
Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.
1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier
EUVD-2021-2096
No EUVD known-exploited evidence
ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.
EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days
Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Patch available
01
What, why and how
This affects the package mpath before 0.8.4. A type confusion vulnerability can lead to a bypass of CVE-2018-16490. In particular, the condition ignoreProperties.indexOf(parts[i]) !== -1 returns -1 if parts[i] is ['__proto__']. This is because the method that has been called if the input is an array is Array.prototype.indexOf() and not String.prototype.indexOf(). They behave differently depending on the type of the input.
What
This affects the package mpath before 0.8.4. A type confusion vulnerability can lead to a bypass of CVE-2018-16490. In particular, the condition ignoreProperties.indexOf(parts[i]) !== -1 returns -1 if parts[i] is ['__proto__']. This is because the method that has been called if the input is an array is Array.prototype.indexOf() and not String.prototype.indexOf(). They behave differently depending on the type of the input.
Why
The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
What
This affects the package mpath before 0.8.4. A type confusion vulnerability can lead to a bypass of CVE-2018-16490. In particular, the condition ignoreProperties.indexOf(parts[i]) !== -1 returns -1 if parts[i] is ['__proto__']. This is because the method that has been called if the input is an array is Array.prototype.indexOf() and not String.prototype.indexOf(). They behave differently depending on the type of the input.
Why
The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
02
Exploit reality and attack path
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
Observed exploitation ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.No confirmed evidence
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
Public PoC / exploit material ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.Reference recorded
A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.
Likely attack path
a network path → Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion'). The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.
CVSS vector ?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-2096Official EUVD mapping
0 linked advisory records.
Official EUVD record ↗Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20210908Security Bulletin 08 Sep 2021
The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Sep 2021, published on 8 September 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0608Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM
et 2025
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7239757
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7239816 du 15 juillet 2025
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7239816
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7239856 du 16 juillet 2025
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7239856
Référence CVE CVE-2020-16156
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-16156
Référence CVE CVE-2020-28469
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28469
Référence CVE CVE-2020-36518
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36518
Référence CVE CVE-2020-4301
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4301
Référence CVE CVE-2021-20468
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20468
Référence CVE CVE-2021-23438
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23438
Référence CVE CVE-2021-28918
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28918
Référence CVE CVE-2021-29418
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29418
Référence CVE CVE-2021-29823
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29823
Référence CVE CVE-2021-3749
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3749
Référence CVE CVE-2021-3807
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3807
Référence CVE CVE-2021-39009
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39009
Référence CVE CVE-2021-39045
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39045
Référence CVE CVE-2021-43797
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-785Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM Cognos Analytics
arbitraire à distance, un déni de
service à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des
correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Documentation
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 6615285 du 31 août 2022
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6615285
Référence CVE CVE-2020-28469
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28469
Référence CVE CVE-2020-36518
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36518
Référence CVE CVE-2020-4301
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4301
Référence CVE CVE-2021-20468
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20468
Référence CVE CVE-2021-23438
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23438
Référence CVE CVE-2021-28918
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28918
Référence CVE CVE-2021-29418
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29418
Référence CVE CVE-2021-29823
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29823
Référence CVE CVE-2021-3749
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3749
Référence CVE CVE-2021-3807
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3807
Référence CVE CVE-2021-39009
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39009
Référence CVE CVE-2021-39045
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39045
Référence CVE CVE-2021-43797
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-
Official advisory ↗JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-010156mpath における型の取り違えに関する脆弱性
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Status ?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04
Evidence and provenance
Published 1 Sept 2021 · Last source change 16 Sept 2024, 17:52 UTC · CWE-843 · Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source ?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-2096
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment
Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.