BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2021-22884High confidence

Node.js before 10.24.0, 12.21.0, 14.16.0, and 15.10.0 is vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks as the whitelist includes “localhost6”

NodeJS · Node

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 30 Apr 2025

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 32.36% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs NodeJS Node and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

10 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · communitynodejs-currentVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.15.10.0-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 11 Sep 2026
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainnodejsVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.14.16.0-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · communitynodejs-currentVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.15.10.0-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 11 Sep 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainnodejsVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.14.16.0-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · communitynodejs-currentVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.15.10.0-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 19 Aug 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainnodejsVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.14.16.0-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcenodejsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.12.21.0~dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcenodejsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.12.21.0~dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcenodejsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.12.21.0~dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcenodejsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.12.21.0~dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-389290 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalSiemens ProductCERTSSA-389290: Third-Party Component Vulnerabilities in SINEC INS
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SINEC INS
Summary
Node.js before 10.24.0, 12.21.0, 14.16.0, and 15.10.0 is vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks as the whitelist includes “localhost6”. When “localhost6” is not present in /etc/hosts, it is just an ordinary domain that is resolved via DNS, i.e., over network. If the attacker controls the victim's DNS server or can spoof its responses, the DNS rebinding protection can be bypassed by using the “localhost6” domain. As long as the attacker uses the “localhost6” domain, they can still apply the attack described in CVE-2018-7160.
Remediation
Update to V1.0.1.1 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-10017

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

Node.js before 10.24.0, 12.21.0, 14.16.0, and 15.10.0 is vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks as the whitelist includes “localhost6”. When “localhost6” is not present in /etc/hosts, it is just an ordinary domain that is resolved via DNS, i.e., over network. If the attacker controls the victim's DNS server or can spoof its responses, the DNS rebinding protection can be bypassed by using the “localhost6” domain. As long as the attacker uses the “localhost6” domain, they can still apply the attack described in CVE-2018-7160.

What

Node.js before 10.24.0, 12.21.0, 14.16.0, and 15.10.0 is vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks as the whitelist includes “localhost6”. When “localhost6” is not present in /etc/hosts, it is just an ordinary domain that is resolved via DNS, i.e., over network. If the attacker controls the victim's DNS server or can spoof its responses, the DNS rebinding protection can be bypassed by using the “localhost6” domain. As long as the attacker uses the “localhost6” domain, they can still apply the attack described in CVE-2018-7160.

Why

The product performs reverse DNS resolution on an IP address to obtain the hostname and make a security decision, but it does not properly ensure that the IP address is truly associated with the hostname.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Node.js before 10.24.0, 12.21.0, 14.16.0, and 15.10.0 is vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks as the whitelist includes “localhost6”. When “localhost6” is not present in /etc/hosts, it is just an ordinary domain that is resolved via DNS, i.e., over network. If the attacker controls the victim's DNS server or can spoof its responses, the DNS rebinding protection can be bypassed by using the “localhost6” domain. As long as the attacker uses the “localhost6” domain, they can still apply the attack described in CVE-2018-7160.

Why

The product performs reverse DNS resolution on an IP address to obtain the hostname and make a security decision, but it does not properly ensure that the IP address is truly associated with the hostname.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-350 ↗

CWE-350: Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action. The product performs reverse DNS resolution on an IP address to obtain the hostname and make a security decision, but it does not properly ensure that the IP address is truly associated with the hostname.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-350Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0485Node.js: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Node.js ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20210310Security Bulletin 10 Mar 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Mar 2021, published on 10 March 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-216Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8265 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8284 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8285 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8286 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8287 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8625 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9327 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22876 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22883 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22884 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22890 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22897 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22898 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22901 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22918 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22921 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22922 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-559Multiples vulnérabilités dans Oracle PeopleSoft

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Oracle PeopleSoft. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-558Multiples vulnérabilités dans Oracle MySQL

eures à 5.7.34 Oracle MySQL versions antérieures à 8.0.25 Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Oracle MySQL. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données. Solution Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Oracle cpujul2021 du 20 juillet 2021 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2021.html Référence CVE CVE-2019-17543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17543 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22884 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22901 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2339 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2340 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2342 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2352 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2354 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2356 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2357

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-490Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM Spectrum Protect

d?id=CVE-2021-21345 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21346 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21347 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21348 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21349 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21350 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21351 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21362 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22883 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22884 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23358 Référence CVE CVE-2021-27919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27919 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28363 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29505 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29921 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31525 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3177 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-395Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM Spectrum Control

d?id=CVE-2021-21344 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21345 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21346 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21347 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21348 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21349 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21350 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21351 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22883 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22884 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23840 Référence CVE CVE-2021-26296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26296 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3449 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3450 Gestion détaillée du document le 21 mai 2021 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défe

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-003953Node.js における脆弱性

Node.js には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SINEC INS
Fixed
Update to V1.0.1.1 or later version
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 3 Mar 2021 · Last source change 30 Apr 2025, 22:24 UTC · CWE-350 · Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-10017
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    4.0 < 4.*; 5.0 < 5.*; 6.0 < 6.*; 7.0 < 7.*; 8.0 < 8.*; 9.0 < 9.*; 10.0 < 10.24.0; 11.0 < 11.* · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    4.0 < 4.*; 5.0 < 5.*; 6.0 < 6.*; 7.0 < 7.*; 8.0 < 8.*; 9.0 < 9.*; 10.0 < 10.24.0; 11.0 < 11.* · Fixed: Update to V1.0.1.1 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-22884 · cve.blacktree.nl