BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2021-22573High confidence

Incorrect signature verification on Google-oauth-java-client

Google LLC · Google-oauth-java-client

8.7HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.30% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Google LLC Google-oauth-java-client and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcegoogle-oauth-client-javaVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.33.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcegoogle-oauth-client-javaVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.33.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcegoogle-oauth-client-javaVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.33.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcegoogle-oauth-client-javaVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.33.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegoogle-oauth-client-javaUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2021-22573 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitygoogle-oauth-client: Token signature not verified
7 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • google-oauth-client.src as a component of Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift
  • google-oauth-client as a component of Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6
  • google-oauth-client as a component of Red Hat JBoss Fuse Service Works 6
  • jenkins-2-plugins as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11
  • jenkins-2-plugins.src as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11
  • jenkins-2-plugins as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
  • jenkins-2-plugins.src as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
Summary
A flaw was found in Google OAuth Java client's IDToken verifier, where it does not verify if the token is properly signed. This issue could allow an attacker to provide a compromised token with a custom payload that will pass the validation on the client side, allowing access to information outside of their prescribed permissions.
Remediation
Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. Installation instructions are available from the Camel for Spring Boot 3.14.5 product documentation page. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_integration/2022.q4/html/getting_started_with_camel_spring_boot/index https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_integration/2022.q4/html/camel_spring_boot_reference/index
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-1221

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

The vulnerability is that IDToken verifier does not verify if token is properly signed. Signature verification makes sure that the token's payload comes from valid provider, not from someone else. An attacker can provide a compromised token with custom payload. The token will pass the validation on the client side. We recommend upgrading to version 1.33.3 or above

What

The vulnerability is that IDToken verifier does not verify if token is properly signed. Signature verification makes sure that the token's payload comes from valid provider, not from someone else. An attacker can provide a compromised token with custom payload. The token will pass the validation on the client side. We recommend upgrading to version 1.33.3 or above

Why

The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

The vulnerability is that IDToken verifier does not verify if token is properly signed. Signature verification makes sure that the token's payload comes from valid provider, not from someone else. An attacker can provide a compromised token with custom payload. The token will pass the validation on the client side. We recommend upgrading to version 1.33.3 or above

Why

The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-347 ↗

CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature. The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
Stolen credentials, tokens and legitimate administration functions may provide continued access without deploying a large custom toolset.
NetworkCWE-347
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1203Oracle Fusion Middleware: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Fusion Middleware ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1375JFrog Artifactory: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in JFrog Artifactory ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen und einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0607Red Hat FUSE: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer, authentisierter oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat FUSE ausnutzen, um vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten und Informationen zu manipulieren und seine Privilegien zu erweitern.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0088IBM Maximo Asset Management: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Maximo Asset Management ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20220504Security Bulletin 04 May 2022

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 04 May 2022, published on 4 May 2022. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0556Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36518 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8840 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8908 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9492 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9546 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9547 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20190 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22569 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22573 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23926 Référence CVE CVE-2021-27807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27807 Référence CVE CVE-2021-27906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27906 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29262 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29425 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31811 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31812 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0500Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

VERecord?id=CVE-2020-9546 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9547 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9548 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0341 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20190 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21290 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21295 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21409 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22569 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22573 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31684 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37137 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-1471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1471 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25857 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25883 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3171 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-002654google-oauth-client library for java におけるデジタル署名の検証に関する脆弱性

google-oauth-client library for java には、デジタル署名の検証に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
Action
Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. Installation instructions are available from the Camel for Spring Boot 3.14.5 product documentation page. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_integration/2022.q4/html/getting_started_with_camel_spring_boot/index https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_integration/2022.q4/html/camel_spring_boot_reference/index
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 3 May 2022 · Last source change 21 Apr 2025, 13:54 UTC · CWE-347 · Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-1221
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    unspecified < 1.33.2 · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    unspecified < 1.33.2 · Fixed: Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. Installation instructions are available from the Camel for Spring Boot 3.14.5 product documentation page. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_integration/2022.q4/html/getting_started_with_camel_spring_boot/index https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_integration/2022.q4/html/camel_spring_boot_reference/index
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
Fixed release recorded from official guidance
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-22573 · cve.blacktree.nl