BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2022
CVE-2021-22570High confidence

Nullptr Dereference in Protobuf

Google LLC · Protobuf

6.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 2.66% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Google LLC Protobuf and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourceprotobufVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.21.9-3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceprotobufVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.21.9-3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceprotobufVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.21.9-3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceprotobufVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.21.9-3Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-0206

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

Nullptr dereference when a null char is present in a proto symbol. The symbol is parsed incorrectly, leading to an unchecked call into the proto file's name during generation of the resulting error message. Since the symbol is incorrectly parsed, the file is nullptr. We recommend upgrading to version 3.15.0 or greater.

What

Nullptr dereference when a null char is present in a proto symbol. The symbol is parsed incorrectly, leading to an unchecked call into the proto file's name during generation of the resulting error message. Since the symbol is incorrectly parsed, the file is nullptr. We recommend upgrading to version 3.15.0 or greater.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Nullptr dereference when a null char is present in a proto symbol. The symbol is parsed incorrectly, leading to an unchecked call into the proto file's name during generation of the resulting error message. Since the symbol is incorrectly parsed, the file is nullptr. We recommend upgrading to version 3.15.0 or greater.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0180Dell Data Protection Advisor: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Data Protection Advisor ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen und nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe zu starten.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-2964Splunk Enterprise: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Splunk Splunk Enterprise ausnutzen, um einen Cross-Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen, um Code auszuführen und um nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-0169Oracle MySQL: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle MySQL ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20220202Security Bulletin 02 Feb 2022

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 02 Feb 2022, published on 2 February 2022. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ERecord?id=CVE-2020-26555 Référence CVE CVE-2020-26945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26945 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7656 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9480 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9492 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21290 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21295 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21409 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22569 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22570 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23337 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23369 Référence CVE CVE-2021-27568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27568 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31684 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33036 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35515 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35516 Référence CVE CVE-2021-35517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0958Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

BM 7281949 du 30 juillet 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7281949 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7281950 du 30 juillet 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7281950 Référence CVE CVE-2018-10237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-10237 Référence CVE CVE-2018-16487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-16487 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13955 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13956 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8908 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22569 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22570 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23337 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47154 Référence CVE CVE-2022-22968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22968 Référence CVE CVE-2022-39135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-39135 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22899 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5752 Référence CVE CVE-2024-12905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12905 Référence CVE CVE-2024-23953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0249Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2018-14040 Référence CVE CVE-2018-14041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14041 Référence CVE CVE-2018-14042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14042 Référence CVE CVE-2018-5764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-5764 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19921 Référence CVE CVE-2019-8331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8331 Référence CVE CVE-2020-15115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15115 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20251 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22569 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22570 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33036 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37404 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21426 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21619 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21624 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21626 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21628 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21628 Référence CVE CVE-2022-29154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22055 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2208 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2212 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2213 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2215 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2217 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2226 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2230 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2232 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22570 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2278 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2293 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2298 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2299 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2300 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2301 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2304 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2305 R

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0956Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Splunk . Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur, une exécution de code arbitraire à distance et une injection de code indirecte à distance (XSS).

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-018173protobuf における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

protobuf には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
Protobuf: unspecified < 3.15.0
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Jan 2022 · Last source change 21 Apr 2025, 13:56 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-0206
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-22570 · cve.blacktree.nl