BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2021-20193High confidence

A flaw was found in the src/list.c of tar 1.33 and earlier

Unknown · tar

Official source article: Siemens SSA-398330 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

3.3LowCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Low technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityLowOperational priority:Low, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 1.09% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown tar and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · maintarVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.34-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · maintarVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.34-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · maintarVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.34-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcetarVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.34+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcetarVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.34+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcetarVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.34+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcetarVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.34+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
A flaw was found in the src/list.c of tar 1.33 and earlier. This flaw allows an attacker who can submit a crafted input file to tar to cause uncontrolled consumption of memory. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-7640

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Low technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A flaw was found in the src/list.c of tar 1.33 and earlier. This flaw allows an attacker who can submit a crafted input file to tar to cause uncontrolled consumption of memory. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

What

A flaw was found in the src/list.c of tar 1.33 and earlier. This flaw allows an attacker who can submit a crafted input file to tar to cause uncontrolled consumption of memory. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

A flaw was found in the src/list.c of tar 1.33 and earlier. This flaw allows an attacker who can submit a crafted input file to tar to cause uncontrolled consumption of memory. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedCWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1969HPE Fabric OS: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Privilegieneskalation

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in HPE Fabric OS für HPE Fibre Channel und SAN Switches ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, Informationen offenzulegen oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0630GNU tar: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Offenlegung von Informationen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in GNU tar ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20210331Security Bulletin 31 Mar 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 31 Mar 2021, published on 31 March 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2930 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29562 Référence CVE CVE-2020-2981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2981 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8203 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2001 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2007 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2010 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2011 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2014 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20193 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2022 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20266 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20298 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20304 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2032 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2036 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-2060 Référence CVE CVE-2021-2144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0297Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper

CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27350 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27783 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28493 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28928 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36242 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8037 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8284 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8285 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8286 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20193 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22946 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22947 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23240 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28831 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28957 Référence CVE CVE-2021-30139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-30139 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33560 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-1015Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8169 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8177 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8231 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8284 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8285 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8286 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8315 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8492 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9327 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20193 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20227 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20231 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20232 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20305 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22876 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22890 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22897 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-004866tar における有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

tar には、有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性、および境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Mar 2021 · Last source change 3 Aug 2024, 17:30 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-7640
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    1.33 and earlier · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    1.33 and earlier · Fixed: Update to V3.1.5 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-20193 · cve.blacktree.nl