BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2021-0687High confidence

In ellipsize of Layout.java, there is a possible ANR due to improper input validation

Unknown · Android

Official source article: Siemens SSA-770721 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.0MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 3 Aug 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.12% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Android and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-770721 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-770721: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC RF160B before V2.2
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC RF160B (6GT2003-0FA00)
Summary
In ellipsize of Layout.java, there is a possible ANR due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-9 Android-10 Android-11 Android-8.1Android ID: A-188913943
Remediation
Update to V2.2 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2021-3306

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In ellipsize of Layout.java, there is a possible ANR due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-9 Android-10 Android-11 Android-8.1Android ID: A-188913943

What

In ellipsize of Layout.java, there is a possible ANR due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-9 Android-10 Android-11 Android-8.1Android ID: A-188913943

Why

The product performs an iteration or loop without sufficiently limiting the number of times that the loop is executed.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In ellipsize of Layout.java, there is a possible ANR due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-9 Android-10 Android-11 Android-8.1Android ID: A-188913943

Why

The product performs an iteration or loop without sufficiently limiting the number of times that the loop is executed.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Excessive Iteration → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-834 ↗

CWE-834: Excessive Iteration. The product performs an iteration or loop without sufficiently limiting the number of times that the loop is executed.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-834
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20211013Security Bulletin 13 Oct 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 13 Oct 2021, published on 13 October 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0203Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0642 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0646 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0650 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0651 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0652 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0653 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0682 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0683 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0684 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0687 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0688 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0689 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0690 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0692 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0695 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0704 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0706 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0708 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-684Multiples vulnérabilités dans Google Android

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0636 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0644 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0680 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0681 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0682 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0683 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0684 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0685 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0686 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0687 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0688 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0689 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0690 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0691 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0692 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0693 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0695 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0869 Ré

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2021-012890Android における過度なイテレーションの脆弱性

Android には、過度なイテレーションの脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、Android ID: A-188913943 として公開されています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SIMATIC RF160B (6GT2003-0FA00)
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 Oct 2021 · Last source change 3 Aug 2024, 15:47 UTC · CWE-834 · Excessive Iteration

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-3306
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2021-3306↗Vendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT · Siemens SSA-770721↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2021-0687 · cve.blacktree.nl