BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2020
CVE-2020-8617High confidence

A logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.c

ISC · BIND9

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2020-29465

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whose configuration does not otherwise make use of it, almost all current BIND servers are vulnerable. In releases of BIND dating from March 2018 and after, an assertion check in tsig.c detects this inconsistent state and deliberately exits. Prior to the introduction of the check the server would continue operating in an inconsistent state, with potentially harmful results.

What

Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whose configuration does not otherwise make use of it, almost all current BIND servers are vulnerable. In releases of BIND dating from March 2018 and after, an assertion check in tsig.c detects this inconsistent state and deliberately exits. Prior to the introduction of the check the server would continue operating in an inconsistent state, with potentially harmful results.

Why

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whose configuration does not otherwise make use of it, almost all current BIND servers are vulnerable. In releases of BIND dating from March 2018 and after, an assertion check in tsig.c detects this inconsistent state and deliberately exits. Prior to the introduction of the check the server would continue operating in an inconsistent state, with potentially harmful results.

Why

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Reachable Assertion → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-617

CWE-617: Reachable Assertion. The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-617
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1198Internet Systems Consortium BIND: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Internet Systems Consortium BIND ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder sonstige Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20200520Security Bulletin 20 May 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 20 May 2020, published on 20 May 2020. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-650Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

rg/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2800 Référence CVE CVE-2020-2803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2803 Référence CVE CVE-2020-2805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2805 Référence CVE CVE-2020-2830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2830 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29573 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36322 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36385 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8492 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8616 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8617 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8840 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9327 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20227 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20271 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22946 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23017 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23839 Référence CVE CVE-2021-23840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-791Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36329 Référence CVE CVE-2020-4951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4951 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8177 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8231 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8284 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8285 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8286 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8315 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8492 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8617 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8622 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8624 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8625 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8927 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9948 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9951 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-9983 Référence CVE CVE-2021-1817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-1817 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-033Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

VERecord?id=CVE-2014-3567 Référence CVE CVE-2014-8176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-8176 Référence CVE CVE-2015-0292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-0292 Référence CVE CVE-2018-20997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20997 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11477 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11478 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11479 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13565 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8616 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8617 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0202 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0203 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0205 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0206 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0207 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0208 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0209 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0210 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-302Multiples vulnérabilités dans Bind

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Bind. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-004591ISC BIND 9 に複数の脆弱性

ISC (Internet Systems Consortium) が提供する BIND には、複数の脆弱性が存在します。 * DNS の名前解決動作の制御が不十分 - CVE-2020-8616 * tsig.c でアサーションエラーが発生する - CVE-2020-8617

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5133BIND DNS 취약점 보안 업데이트 권고

메시지의 유효성을 검증하는 BIND 코드에서 특정 메시지에 대한 검증이 미흡하여 발생하는 서비스 거부 취약점(CVE-2020-8617) [2]

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
BIND9: 9.0.0 -> 9.11.18, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.4-P2, 9.14.0 -> 9.14.11, 9.16.0 -> 9.16.2, and releases 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the 9.17 experimental development branch. All releases in the obsolete 9.13 and 9.15 development branches. All releases of BIND Supported Preview Edition from 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.18-S1
Fixed
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 May 2020 · Last source change 16 Sept 2024, 20:26 UTC · CWE-617 · Reachable Assertion

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-29465
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2020-8617 · cve.blacktree.nl