BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2020
CVE-2020-8597High confidence

eap.c in pppd in ppp 2.4.2 through 2.4.8 has an rhostname buffer overflow in the eap_request and eap_response functions

Unknown · Unknown

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 19.93% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

11 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainpppVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.4.8-r1Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainpppVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.4.8-r1Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainpppVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.4.8-r1Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelwipVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.1.2+dfsg1-5Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcepppVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.8-1+1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelwipVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.1.2+dfsg1-5Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcepppVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.8-1+1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelwipVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.1.2+dfsg1-5Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcepppVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.8-1+1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelwipVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.1.2+dfsg1-5Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcepppVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.8-1+1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SEVD-2022-011-02 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalSchneider Electric CPCERTEasergy T300
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • Schneider Electric Easergy T300 <=2.7.1
Summary
A point-to-point (pppd) communication library deployed with the T300 is vulnerable to CVE2020-8597, a CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input vulnerability, which may allow for arbitrary code execution and lead to a denial of service when an attacker gains access to a connected cellular network. The CVSS score, provided above, is evaluated as Medium in the product context.
Remediation
Easergy T300 firmware V2.8 includes a fix for this vulnerability and is available from the Schneider Electric Customer Care Center. Note: The 3G/4G hardware is optional and the feature is disabled by default. In case this feature is used as a communication channel, it is recommended to disable it until the firmware is upgraded.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2020-29445

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

eap.c in pppd in ppp 2.4.2 through 2.4.8 has an rhostname buffer overflow in the eap_request and eap_response functions.

What

eap.c in pppd in ppp 2.4.2 through 2.4.8 has an rhostname buffer overflow in the eap_request and eap_response functions.

Why

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

eap.c in pppd in ppp 2.4.2 through 2.4.8 has an rhostname buffer overflow in the eap_request and eap_response functions.

Why

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-120 ↗

CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'). The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-120
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV20-056Linux security advisory

Several Linux distributions have released security updates to address vulnerabilities in their respective operating systems. Of note is a vulnerability in the Point-to-Point Protocol Daemon (pppd) versions 2.4.2 through 2.4.8. Due to a flaw in the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) packet processing in the Point-to-Point Protocol Daemon (pppd), an unauthenticated remote actor may be able to cause a stack buffer overflow, allowing for arbitrary code execution on the target system.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-017Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Schneider

/download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SEVD-2022-011-04 Bulletin de sécurité Schneider SEVD-2022-011-05 du 11 janvier 2022 https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SEVD-2022-011-05 Bulletin de sécurité Schneider SEVD-2022-011-06 du 11 janvier 2022 https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SEVD-2022-011-06 Bulletin de sécurité Schneider SEVD-2022-011-07 du 11 janvier 2022 https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SEVD-2022-011-07 Référence CVE CVE-2019-8963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8963 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7534 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7534 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8597 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21864 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21865 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21867 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21868 Référence CVE CVE-2021-21869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21869 Référence CVE CVE-2021-29240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-494Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une atteinte à l'intégrité des données et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-331Multiples vulnérabilités dans Google Android

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-3642 Référence CVE CVE-2020-3658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-3658 Référence CVE CVE-2020-3660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-3660 Référence CVE CVE-2020-3661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-3661 Référence CVE CVE-2020-3662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-3662 Référence CVE CVE-2020-3663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-3663 Référence CVE CVE-2020-3665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-3665 Référence CVE CVE-2020-3676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-3676 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8428 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8597 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8647 Référence CVE CVE-2020-8648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8648 Gestion détaillée du document le 02 juin 2020 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-325Vulnérabilité dans Hirschmann OWL

Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans Hirschmann OWL. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-001593ppp における古典的バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性

ppp には、古典的バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Schneider Electric Easergy T300 <=2.7.1
Fixed
Schneider Electric Easergy T300 2.8
Action
Easergy T300 firmware V2.8 includes a fix for this vulnerability and is available from the Schneider Electric Customer Care Center. Note: The 3G/4G hardware is optional and the feature is disabled by default. In case this feature is used as a communication channel, it is recommended to disable it until the firmware is upgraded.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 3 Feb 2020 · Last source change 3 Dec 2025, 15:15 UTC · CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-29445
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Schneider Electric CPCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Schneider Electric CPCERT
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: Easergy T300 firmware V2.8 includes a fix for this vulnerability and is available from the Schneider Electric Customer Care Center. Note: The 3G/4G hardware is optional and the feature is disabled by default. In case this feature is used as a communication channel, it is recommended to disable it until the firmware is upgraded.
    Schneider Electric CPCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
Fixed release recorded from official guidance
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2020-8597 · cve.blacktree.nl