BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2020-7461High confidence

n/a FreeBSD — Out-of-bounds Write

Unknown · FreeBSD

7.3HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 4.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Apply the linked authoritative mitigation while planning the permanent fix.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown FreeBSD and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-288459 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalSiemens ProductCERTSSA-288459: Heap Overflow Vulnerability in RFID terminals
2 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC RF350M
  • SIMATIC RF650M
Summary
In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r365010, 11.4-STABLE before r365011, 12.1-RELEASE before p9, 11.4-RELEASE before p3, and 11.3-RELEASE before p13, dhclient(8) fails to handle certain malformed input related to handling of DHCP option 119 resulting a heap overflow. The heap overflow could in principle be exploited to achieve remote code execution. The affected process runs with reduced privileges in a Capsicum sandbox, limiting the immediate impact of an exploit.
Remediation
Protect network access to affected devices.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2020-28587

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r365010, 11.4-STABLE before r365011, 12.1-RELEASE before p9, 11.4-RELEASE before p3, and 11.3-RELEASE before p13, dhclient(8) fails to handle certain malformed input related to handling of DHCP option 119 resulting a heap overflow. The heap overflow could in principle be exploited to achieve remote code execution. The affected process runs with reduced privileges in a Capsicum sandbox, limiting the immediate impact of an exploit.

What

In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r365010, 11.4-STABLE before r365011, 12.1-RELEASE before p9, 11.4-RELEASE before p3, and 11.3-RELEASE before p13, dhclient(8) fails to handle certain malformed input related to handling of DHCP option 119 resulting a heap overflow. The heap overflow could in principle be exploited to achieve remote code execution. The affected process runs with reduced privileges in a Capsicum sandbox, limiting the immediate impact of an exploit.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r365010, 11.4-STABLE before r365011, 12.1-RELEASE before p9, 11.4-RELEASE before p3, and 11.3-RELEASE before p13, dhclient(8) fails to handle certain malformed input related to handling of DHCP option 119 resulting a heap overflow. The heap overflow could in principle be exploited to achieve remote code execution. The affected process runs with reduced privileges in a Capsicum sandbox, limiting the immediate impact of an exploit.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Out-of-bounds Write → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787 ↗

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
NetworkUnauthenticatedRemote code executionCWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20210331Security Bulletin 31 Mar 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 31 Mar 2021, published on 31 March 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-706Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

df Bulletin de sécurité Siemens ssa-987403 du 14 septembre 2021 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-987403.pdf Bulletin de sécurité Siemens ssa-997732 du 14 septembre 2021 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-997732.pdf Référence CVE CVE-2016-10011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-10011 Référence CVE CVE-2016-10708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-10708 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10941 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36475 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36478 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7461 Référence CVE CVE-2021-25665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25665 Référence CVE CVE-2021-27391 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27391 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31891 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33716 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33719 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33720 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33737 Référence CVE CVE-2021-37173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-016427FreeBSD における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

FreeBSD には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5579Juniper 제품군 보안 업데이트 권고

SS) 취약점 (CVE-2022-22181) 등 2개 o Contrail Networking에서 발생하는 원격 코드 실행 취약점 (CVE-2019-1349) 등 3개 o Juniper Secure Analytics에서 발생하는 힙 버퍼 오버플로우 취약점 (CVE-2021-31560) o Paragon Active Assurance Control Center에서 발생하는 부적절한 액세스 제어 취약점 (CVE-2022-22190) o Paragon Active Assurance Formerly Netrounds (Active Assurance)에서 범위를 벗어난 쓰기 및 읽기로 인해 발생하는 로컬 권한 상승 취약점 (CVE-2021-4034) o JIMS(Juniper Identity Management Service)에서 발생하는 로컬 권한 상승 취약점 (CVE-2022-22187) o Contrail Service Orchestration 6.0.0에서 발생하는 권한 상승 취약점 (CVE-2022-22189) o EX4650 시리즈의 Junos OS에서 발생하는 부적절한 초기화 취약점 (CVE-2022-22186) o Junos OS vSRX 3.0 내 FreeBSD dhclient에서 범위를 벗어난 쓰기로 인해 발생하는 힙 오버플로우 취약점 (CVE-2020-7461) ##### □ 영향을 받는 시스템 o 참고사이트의 각 게시물에 명시되어 있는 ‘Product Affected’을 통해 취약한 제품 확인 ##### □ 해결 방안 o 취약한 Juniper 소프트웨어가 설치된 Juniper 장비의 운영자는 해당사이트에 명시되어 있는 ‘Solution’ 내용을 확인하여 패치를 적용하거나 ‘Workaround’ 내용을 확인하여 보안 설정 적용 ##### □ 기타 문의사항 o 한국인터넷진흥원 인터넷침해대응센터: 국번없이 118 [참고사이트] [1] https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/global-search/%40uri?language=en_US#sort=relevancy&f:ctype=[Security%20Advisories] ##### □ 작성 : 침해사고분석단 취약점분석팀

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Protect network access to affected devices.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Mar 2021 · Last source change 4 Aug 2024, 09:25 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-28587
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    KISA KrCERT/CC ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2020-7461 · cve.blacktree.nl