BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2020
CVE-2020-4788High confidence

IBM Power9 (AIX 7.1, 7.2, and VIOS 3.1) processors could allow a local user to obtain sensitive information from the data in the L1 cache under extenuating circumstances

IBM · VIOS

4.7MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 16 Sep 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.39% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs IBM VIOS and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.9.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.9.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.9.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.9.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2020-4788 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 42 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2020-4788
22 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-source-azure as component of HPE Helion OpenStack 8
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP4-ESPOS
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP4
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP4
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE OpenStack Cloud 8
  • kernel-source-azure as component of SUSE OpenStack Cloud 9
Summary
IBM Power9 (AIX 7.1, 7.2, and VIOS 3.1) processors could allow a local user to obtain sensitive information from the data in the L1 cache under extenuating circumstances. IBM X-Force ID: 189296.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2020-26035

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

IBM Power9 (AIX 7.1, 7.2, and VIOS 3.1) processors could allow a local user to obtain sensitive information from the data in the L1 cache under extenuating circumstances. IBM X-Force ID: 189296.

What

IBM Power9 (AIX 7.1, 7.2, and VIOS 3.1) processors could allow a local user to obtain sensitive information from the data in the L1 cache under extenuating circumstances. IBM X-Force ID: 189296.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may obtain information outside the intended access boundary.

What

IBM Power9 (AIX 7.1, 7.2, and VIOS 3.1) processors could allow a local user to obtain sensitive information from the data in the L1 cache under extenuating circumstances. IBM X-Force ID: 189296.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may obtain information outside the intended access boundary.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → obtain information outside the intended access boundary
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20201125Security Bulletin 25 Nov 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 25 Nov 2020, published on 25 November 2020. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-923Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rg/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-3639 Référence CVE CVE-2018-9517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9517 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3874 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3900 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0429 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12655 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12770 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14305 Référence CVE CVE-2020-3702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-3702 Référence CVE CVE-2020-4788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4788 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0941 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20265 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20320 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20322 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22543 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31916 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33033 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-916Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rg/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-7841 Référence CVE CVE-2018-13405 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-13405 Référence CVE CVE-2018-9517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9517 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3874 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3900 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0429 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12770 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36385 Référence CVE CVE-2020-3702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-3702 Référence CVE CVE-2020-4788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4788 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0941 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20265 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20322 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22543 Référence CVE CVE-2021-31916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31916 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33033 Référence CVE CVE-2021-33909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33909 Référence CVE CVE-2021-34556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-125Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2020-25669 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27068 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27777 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27786 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28915 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28974 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29660 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29661 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36158 Référence CVE CVE-2020-4788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4788 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3347 Gestion détaillée du document le 17 février 2021 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-120Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2020-28374 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28915 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28974 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29371 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29371 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29568 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29569 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29660 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29661 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36158 Référence CVE CVE-2020-4788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4788 Référence CVE CVE-2021-0342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0342 Référence CVE CVE-2021-20177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20177 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3347 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3348 Gestion détaillée du document le 15 février 2021 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Déf

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-035Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur, une exécution de code arbitraire à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-021Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur, une exécution de code arbitraire à distance et un déni de service.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-006Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, un déni de service et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-837Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur, un déni de service et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-820Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur, un déni de service et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-811Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur, un déni de service et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-786Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, un déni de service et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-013841IBM Power9 における脆弱性

IBM Power9 (AIX および VIOS) には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性を IBM X-Force ID: 189296 として公開しています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 20 Nov 2020 · Last source change 16 Sept 2024, 19:05 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-26035
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2020-4788 · cve.blacktree.nl