Patch only the product branches with a verified fix
Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Published severityMedium→Operational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 16 Sep 2024
Evidence used
No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
EPSS is 7.34% for the current model date.
Compensating controls
Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.
Verification
Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Lodash and falls inside the recorded affected range.
Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Cross-source reconciliation
Remediation availability differs by product scope
Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Siemens ProductCERT: 1 affected or under-investigation product state without a fixed product state in the same current advisory
Distribution package intelligence
Release-specific package status
Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.
4 package states
Repository candidate not checked
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
Distribution release
Source package
Vendor state
Fixed version
Evidence
Debian trixietrixie · source
node-lodash
Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.
These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.
Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.
1 current
SSA-637483 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalSiemens ProductCERTSSA-637483 Third-Party Component Vulnerabilities in SINEC INS before V1.0 SP2
1 known affected
The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.
SINEC INS
Summary
Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the toNumber, trim and trimEnd functions.
Remediation
Update to V1.0 SP2 or later version
Optional official sources
National CERT insights ?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.
Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.
Official European source
ENISA European Vulnerability Database
Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.
1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier
EUVD-2022-0424
No EUVD known-exploited evidence
ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.
EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix
Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Fix availability varies by product
01
What, why and how
Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the toNumber, trim and trimEnd functions.
What
Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the toNumber, trim and trimEnd functions.
Why
The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.
What
Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the toNumber, trim and trimEnd functions.
Why
The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.
02
Exploit reality and attack path
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
Observed exploitation ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.No confirmed evidence
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
Public PoC / exploit material ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.Reference recorded
A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.
Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector ?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:P
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of servicePublic exploit reference
A
Official authority intelligence
Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-0424Official EUVD mapping
0 linked advisory records.
Official EUVD record ↗BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-3025IBM InfoSphere Information Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen
Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM InfoSphere Information Server ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.
Official advisory ↗BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1375JFrog Artifactory: Mehrere Schwachstellen
Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in JFrog Artifactory ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern, beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen und einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.
Official advisory ↗BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0857IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen
Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen, Dateien manipulieren oder Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.
Official advisory ↗BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1384Red Hat Virtualization: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service
Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat Virtualization ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.
Official advisory ↗Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20210217Security Bulletin 17 Feb 2021
The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 17 Feb 2021, published on 17 February 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0901Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM
tps://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7280009
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7280010 du 14 juillet 2026
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7280010
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7280089 du 15 juillet 2026
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7280089
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7280105 du 15 juillet 2026
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7280105
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7280131 du 15 juillet 2026
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7280131
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7280183 du 15 juillet 2026
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7280183
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7279466 du 27 août 2026
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7279466
Référence CVE CVE-2020-28500
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28500
Référence CVE CVE-2020-7760
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7760
Référence CVE CVE-2020-8203
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8203
Référence CVE CVE-2021-23337
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23337
Référence CVE CVE-2022-21704
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21704
Référence CVE CVE-2022-24785
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-24785
Référence CVE CVE-2022-31129
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31129
Référence CVE CVE-2022-40896
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40896
Référence CVE CVE-2023-32681
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1051Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM
exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Documentation
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7177220 du 02 décembre 2024
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7177220
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7177981 du 05 décembre 2024
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7177981
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7178033 du 05 décembre 2024
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7178033
Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7178054 du 06 décembre 2024
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7178054
Référence CVE CVE-2020-28500
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28500
Référence CVE CVE-2020-8203
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8203
Référence CVE CVE-2021-22918
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22918
Référence CVE CVE-2021-22921
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22921
Référence CVE CVE-2021-22930
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22930
Référence CVE CVE-2021-22931
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22931
Référence CVE CVE-2021-22939
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22939
Référence CVE CVE-2021-22940
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22940
Référence CVE CVE-2021-22959
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-814Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits SIEMENS
uctcert/html/ssa-518824.html
Bulletin de sécurité Siemens ssa-589975 du 13 septembre 2022
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-589975.html
Bulletin de sécurité Siemens ssa-637483 du 13 septembre 2022
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-637483.html
Bulletin de sécurité Siemens ssa-638652 du 13 septembre 2022
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-638652.html
Référence CVE CVE-2016-0701
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0701
Référence CVE CVE-2020-12762
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12762
Référence CVE CVE-2020-28168
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28168
Référence CVE CVE-2020-28500
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28500
Référence CVE CVE-2020-7793
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7793
Référence CVE CVE-2021-23337
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23337
Référence CVE CVE-2021-23839
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23839
Référence CVE CVE-2021-23841
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23841
Référence CVE CVE-2021-25217
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25217
Référence CVE CVE-2021-25220
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25220
Référence CVE CVE-2021-3749
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3749
Référence CVE CVE-2021-4160
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-494Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM.
Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une
exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance
et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-424Multiples vulnérabilités dans F5 BIG-IP
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans F5 BIG-IP.
Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une
exécution de code arbitraire, un déni de service et une atteinte à
l'intégrité des données.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-1025Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM QRadar
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans IBM QRadar.
Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une
exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance,
un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une atteinte à
l'intégrité des données.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-671Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM Spectrum Protect Plus
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans IBM Spectrum
Protect Plus. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution
de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une
élévation de privilèges.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Status ?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04
Evidence and provenance
Published 15 Feb 2021 · Last source change 16 Sept 2024, 22:15 UTC · CWE not yet assigned
CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source ?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.