BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2020-25709High confidence

A flaw was found in OpenLDAP

Unknown · OpenLDAP

Official source article: Siemens SSA-398330 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 2.86% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown OpenLDAP and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainopenldapVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.4.56-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainopenldapVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.4.56-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainopenldapVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.4.56-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourceopenldapVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.56+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceopenldapVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.56+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceopenldapVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.56+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceopenldapVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.56+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
A flaw was found in OpenLDAP. This flaw allows an attacker who can send a malicious packet to be processed by OpenLDAP’s slapd server, to trigger an assertion failure. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2020-18364

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A flaw was found in OpenLDAP. This flaw allows an attacker who can send a malicious packet to be processed by OpenLDAP’s slapd server, to trigger an assertion failure. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

What

A flaw was found in OpenLDAP. This flaw allows an attacker who can send a malicious packet to be processed by OpenLDAP’s slapd server, to trigger an assertion failure. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

Why

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

A flaw was found in OpenLDAP. This flaw allows an attacker who can send a malicious packet to be processed by OpenLDAP’s slapd server, to trigger an assertion failure. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

Why

The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Reachable Assertion → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-617 ↗

CWE-617: Reachable Assertion. The product contains an assert() or similar statement that can be triggered by an attacker, which leads to an application exit or other behavior that is more severe than necessary.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-617
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20210519Security Bulletin 19 May 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 19 May 2021, published on 19 May 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-1015Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2020-19189 Référence CVE CVE-2020-19190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-19190 Référence CVE CVE-2020-19909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-19909 Référence CVE CVE-2020-21047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-21047 Référence CVE CVE-2020-21913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-21913 Référence CVE CVE-2020-22218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-22218 Référence CVE CVE-2020-24659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24659 Référence CVE CVE-2020-24977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24977 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25692 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25709 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25710 Référence CVE CVE-2020-26116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26116 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27618 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28196 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29361 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29362 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29363 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-916Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

d?id=CVE-2020-14351 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14385 Référence CVE CVE-2020-24394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24394 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25211 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25212 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25643 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25645 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25656 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25705 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25709 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25710 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25717 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25717 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27170 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27777 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28374 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28469 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29661 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-619Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM QRadar

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans IBM QRadar. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, une atteinte à l'intégrité des données et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-072Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Apple

, un déni de service à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité. Solution Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Apple HT212147 du 01 février 2021 https://support.apple.com/fr-fr/HT212147 Bulletin de sécurité Apple HT212152 du 01 février 2021 https://support.apple.com/fr-fr/HT212152 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20838 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14155 Référence CVE CVE-2020-15358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15358 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25709 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27904 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27937 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27938 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27945 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29608 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29614 Référence CVE CVE-2020-29633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29633 Référence CVE CVE-2021-1736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-016760OpenLDAP における到達可能なアサーションに関する脆弱性

OpenLDAP には、到達可能なアサーションに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 18 May 2021 · Last source change 4 Aug 2024, 15:40 UTC · CWE-617 · Reachable Assertion

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-18364
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    openldap 2.4.56 · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    openldap 2.4.56 · Fixed: Update to V3.1.5 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2020-25709 · cve.blacktree.nl