BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2021
CVE-2020-25236High confidence

A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO!

Siemens · LOGO! 12/24RCE

Official source article: Siemens SSA-783481 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.27% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Apply the linked authoritative mitigation while planning the permanent fix.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Siemens LOGO! 12/24RCE and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-783481 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 4 · finalSiemens ProductCERTSSA-783481: Denial-of-Service Vulnerability in LOGO! 8 BM
16 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA1)
  • LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA1)
  • SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA1)
  • SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA1)
  • SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA1)
  • SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA1)
Summary
The control logic (CL) the LOGO! 8 executes could be manipulated in a way that could cause the device executing the CL to improperly handle the manipulation and crash. After successful execution of the attack, the device needs to be manually reset.
Remediation
Siemens recommends limiting the possibilities to execute untrusted code if possible.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2020-17926

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA1) (All versions). The control logic (CL) the LOGO! 8 executes could be manipulated in a way that could cause the device executing the CL to improperly handle the manipulation and crash. After successful execution of the attack, the device needs to be manually reset.

What

A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA1) (All versions). The control logic (CL) the LOGO! 8 executes could be manipulated in a way that could cause the device executing the CL to improperly handle the manipulation and crash. After successful execution of the attack, the device needs to be manually reset.

Why

The product does not handle or incorrectly handles an exceptional condition.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA1) (All versions), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA1) (All versions), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA1) (All versions). The control logic (CL) the LOGO! 8 executes could be manipulated in a way that could cause the device executing the CL to improperly handle the manipulation and crash. After successful execution of the attack, the device needs to be manually reset.

Why

The product does not handle or incorrectly handles an exceptional condition.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-755 ↗

CWE-755: Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions. The product does not handle or incorrectly handles an exceptional condition.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:P/RL:T/RC:C

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-755
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20210317Security Bulletin 17 Mar 2021

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 17 Mar 2021, published on 17 March 2021. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-176Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

ssa-917115.pdf Bulletin de sécurité Siemens ssa-936080 du 09 mars 2021 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-936080.pdf Bulletin de sécurité Siemens ssa-979775 du 09 mars 2021 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-979775.pdf Référence CVE CVE-2019-10925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10925 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10926 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3823 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13987 Référence CVE CVE-2020-17437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-17437 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25236 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25239 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25240 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25241 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27632 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28385 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28387 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28388 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-016312LOGO! 8 BM における例外的な状態の処理に関する脆弱性

LOGO! 8 BM (SIPLUS variants 含む) には、例外的な状態の処理に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Siemens recommends limiting the possibilities to execute untrusted code if possible.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 15 Mar 2021 · Last source change 8 Oct 2024, 08:39 UTC · CWE-755 · Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-17926
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-17926↗Vendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT · Siemens SSA-783481↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2020-25236 · cve.blacktree.nl