BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2020
CVE-2020-25043High confidence

The installer of Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection prior to 5.0 was vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion that could allow an attacker to delete any file in the system

Unknown · Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 4 Aug 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.31% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2020-17736

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

The installer of Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection prior to 5.0 was vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion that could allow an attacker to delete any file in the system.

What

The installer of Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection prior to 5.0 was vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion that could allow an attacker to delete any file in the system.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

The installer of Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection prior to 5.0 was vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion that could allow an attacker to delete any file in the system.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20200909Security Bulletin 09 Sep 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 09 Sep 2020, published on 9 September 2020. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-010715Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection における脆弱性

Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5251주요 보안 취약점 업데이트를 재확인 하세요!!

C, Gateway,SDWAN-WANOP 임의코드 실행 취약점 [2] 3 네트워크 CVE-2020-11896 Cisco ASR 500,5500 원격코드 실행 취약점 [3] 4 운영체제 CVE-2020-7247 - OpenSMTPD 원격코드 실행 취약점 [4] 5 운영체제 CVE-2020-0674 MS 인터넷 익스플로러 원격코드 실행 취약점 [5] 6 운영체제 CVE-2020-0688 MS 윈도우 Exchange 서버 원격코드 실행 취약점 [6] 7 운영체제 CVE-2020-0796 MS 윈도우 SMBv3 원격코드 실행 취약점 [7] 8 운영체제 CVE-2019-14287 유닉스/리눅스 - sudo 명령어 취약점 [8] 9 운영체제 CVE-2020-1472 MS 윈도우 서버 Netlogon 권한상승 취약점 [9] 10 가상화 CVE-2020-3943 외 2개 VMware vRealize Operations 임의코드 실행 취약점 등 [10] 11 가상화 CVE-2020-3952 VMware vCenter Server 정보유노출 취약점 [11] 12 웹서버 CVE-2020-1938 Apache Tomcat 원격코드 실행 취약점 [12] 13 보안솔루션 CVE-2020-7845 지란지교시큐리티 스팸스나이퍼 버퍼오버플로우 취약점 [13] 14 보안솔루션 CVE-2020-25043 외 11개 Kaspersky 등 7개사 백신프로그램 임의파일 삭제 취약점 등 [14] 15 원격협업 CVE-2020-6109 외 1개 Zoom Zoom 임의파일 쓰기 취약점 [15] 16 원격협업 CVE-2020-8207 Citrix Workspace 권한 상승 취약점 [16] 17 원격협업 CVE-2020-13699 Team Viewer TeamViewer 원격코드 실행 취약점 [17] 18 IoT CVE-2020-10173 외 10개 LG 등 9개사 공유기, IP카메라 등 악성코드 유포, DDoS [18] 19 복합기 CVE-2018-5924 HP HP DesignJet 원격코드 실행 취약점 [19] 20 솔루션 CVE-2019-0708 외 24개 MS 등 14개사 운영체제, 보안솔루션 등 임의코드 실행 취약점 등 [20] 21 솔루션 - 위즈베라 Veraport 설치프로그램을 악용한 악성코드 유포 [21] 22 솔루션 - 솔라윈즈 솔라윈즈 오리온 제품 업데이트 과정에서 악성코드 배포 가능 [22] [참고사이트] [1] tools.cisco.com/security/center/Content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20200102-dcnm-comm-inject https://www.krcert.or.kr/dat

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5202백신 프로그램(Antivirus) 제품 취약점 보안 업데이트 권고

#### 백신 프로그램(Antivirus) 제품 취약점 보안 업데이트 권고 2020.10.07 ##### □ 개요 o 백신 프로그램(Antivirus) 제품에서 발생하는 보안 취약점을 해결한 최신 보안 업데이트 권고 o 공격자는 해당 취약점을 이용하여 권한상승 등의 피해를 발생시킬 수 있으므로, 해당 제품을 사용하는 이용자들은 최신 버전으로 업데이트 권고 ##### □ 주요 내용 o Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection의 설치 엔진(installer)과 Virus Removal Tool (KVRT)에서 발생하는 임의파일 삭제 취약점(CVE-2020-25043, 25044) [1] o Kaspersky Security Center와 Web Console에서 설치 엔진(installer)에서 DLL 하이재킹으로 인해 발생하는 권한상승 취약점(CVE-2020-25045) [1] o McAfee Endpoint Security(ENS) for Windows에서 실행 파일에 대한 검증이 미흡하여 발생하는 권한상승 취약점(CVE-2020-7250) [2] o McAfee Total Protection Trial의 설치 엔진(installer)에서 실행 파일에 대한 검증이 미흡하여 발생하는 권한상승 취약점(CVE-2020-7310) [3] o Symantec의 Norton Power Eraser에서 발생하는 권한상승 취약점(CVE-2019-19548) [4] o Fortinet의 FortiClient for Windows online 설치 엔진(installer)에서 DLL 하이재킹으로 인해 발생하는 임의코드 실행 취약점(CVE-2020-9290) [5] o Check Point의 Endpoint Security Client, Endpoint Security VPN에서 실행 파일에 대한 검증이 미흡하여 발생하는 권한상승 취약점(CVE-2019-8452) [6] o Trend Micro HouseCall for

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
Kaspersky VPN Secure Connection: prior to 5.0
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 Sept 2020 · Last source change 4 Aug 2024, 15:26 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-17736
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification, affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2020-25043 · cve.blacktree.nl