BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2020
CVE-2020-16971High confidence

Azure SDK for Java Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Microsoft · Azure SDK

7.4HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-3213

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

Azure SDK for Java Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

What

Azure SDK for Java Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Azure SDK for Java Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-2592IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, und um Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0162Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Secure Analytics

etworks Secure Analytics. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks On-Demand-JSA-Series-Multiple-vulnerabilities-resolved-in-Juniper-Secure-Analytics-in-7-5-0-UP14-IF01 du 12 février 2026 https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/On-Demand-JSA-Series-Multiple-vulnerabilities-resolved-in-Juniper-Secure-Analytics-in-7-5-0-UP14-IF01 Référence CVE CVE-2020-16971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-16971 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53373 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47252 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47619 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1013Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7250921 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7250926 du 12 novembre 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7250926 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7250956 du 12 novembre 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7250956 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7250959 du 12 novembre 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7250959 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7250971 du 12 novembre 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7250971 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7251173 du 13 novembre 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7251173 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7250474 du 26 novembre 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7250474 Référence CVE CVE-2020-16971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-16971 Référence CVE CVE-2022-31197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31197 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3171 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3509 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3510 Référence CVE CVE-2022-41946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41946 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-202

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-808Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

upport pour Java Extension Visual Studio Code Remote - SSH Extension Visual Studio Code TS-Lint Extension Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans les produits Microsoft . Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un contournement de la fonctionnalité de sécurité, une exécution de code à distance, une usurpation d'identité et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données. Solution Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft du 08 décembre 2020 https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/fr-FR/security-guidance Référence CVE CVE-2020-16971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-16971 Référence CVE CVE-2020-17002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-17002 Référence CVE CVE-2020-17117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-17117 Référence CVE CVE-2020-17119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-17119 Référence CVE CVE-2020-17123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-17123 Référence CVE CVE-2020-17124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-17124 Référence CVE CVE-2020-17125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-17125 Référence CVE CVE-2020-17126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-17126 Référence CVE CVE-2020-17128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
1.0.0 < 1.6.0; 1.0.0 < publication
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 Dec 2020 · Last source change 9 Jun 2026, 18:08 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-3213
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-3213↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2020-16971 · cve.blacktree.nl