BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2020
CVE-2020-14145High confidence

This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts (where no host key for the server has been cached by the client)

Unknown · Unknown

Official source article: Siemens SSA-398330 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.9MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 2.06% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 4 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainopensshVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.8.4_p1-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainopensshVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.8.4_p1-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainopensshVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.8.4_p1-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourceopensshAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceopensshAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceopensshAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceopensshAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
SCA-2025-0011 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1.0.0 · finalSICK PSIRTVulnerabilities affecting Endress+Hauser SSG-E210GC
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • Endress+Hauser SSG-E210GC all Firmware versions
Summary
The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts (where no host key for the server has been cached by the client). NOTE: some reports state that 8.5 and 8.6 are also affected.
Remediation
Please make sure that only trusted entities have access to the device. Furthermore, you should apply the following General Security Measures when operating the product to mitigate the associated security risk. The collected resources "SICK Operating Guidelines" and "ICS-CERT recommended practices on Industrial Security" could help to implement the general security practices.
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts (where no host key for the server has been cached by the client). NOTE: some reports state that 8.5 and 8.6 are also affected.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
SCA-2025-0009 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalSICK PSIRTVulnerabilities affecting SICK TDC-E210GC
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SICK TDC-E210GC all Firmware versions
Summary
The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts (where no host key for the server has been cached by the client). NOTE: some reports state that 8.5 and 8.6 are also affected.
Remediation
Please make sure that only trusted entities have access to the device. Furthermore, you should apply the following General Security Measures when operating the product to mitigate the associated security risk. The collected resources "SICK Operating Guidelines" and "ICS-CERT recommended practices on Industrial Security" could help to implement the general security practices.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2020-6303

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts (where no host key for the server has been cached by the client). NOTE: some reports state that 8.5 and 8.6 are also affected.

What

The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts (where no host key for the server has been cached by the client). NOTE: some reports state that 8.5 and 8.6 are also affected.

Why

The product behaves differently or sends different responses under different circumstances in a way that is observable to an unauthorized actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts (where no host key for the server has been cached by the client). NOTE: some reports state that 8.5 and 8.6 are also affected.

Why

The product behaves differently or sends different responses under different circumstances in a way that is observable to an unauthorized actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Observable Discrepancy → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-203 ↗

CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy. The product behaves differently or sends different responses under different circumstances in a way that is observable to an unauthorized actor.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-203
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1082Juniper JUNOS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Juniper JUNOS im Zusammenhang mit OpenSSH ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, beliebigen Code auszuführen oder Dateien zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1969HPE Fabric OS: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Privilegieneskalation

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in HPE Fabric OS für HPE Fibre Channel und SAN Switches ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, Informationen offenzulegen oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1599IBM Security Guardium: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Security Guardium ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1591Juniper JUNOS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Juniper JUNOS ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service zu verursachen, Informationen offenzulegen, Privilegien zu erweitern und Sicherheitsmechanismen inklusive zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0068OpenSSH: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Umgehen von Sicherheitsvorkehrungen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in OpenSSH ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20200701Security Bulletin 01 Jul 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 01 Jul 2020, published on 1 July 2020. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1018Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Qnap

sécurité Qnap QSA-24-39 du 23 novembre 2024 https://www.qnap.com/go/security-advisory/qsa-24-39 Bulletin de sécurité Qnap QSA-24-40 du 23 novembre 2024 https://www.qnap.com/go/security-advisory/qsa-24-40 Bulletin de sécurité Qnap QSA-24-43 du 23 novembre 2024 https://www.qnap.com/go/security-advisory/qsa-24-43 Bulletin de sécurité Qnap QSA-24-44 du 23 novembre 2024 https://www.qnap.com/go/security-advisory/qsa-24-44 Bulletin de sécurité Qnap QSA-24-46 du 23 novembre 2024 https://www.qnap.com/go/security-advisory/qsa-24-46 Bulletin de sécurité Qnap QSA-24-47 du 23 novembre 2024 https://www.qnap.com/go/security-advisory/qsa-24-47 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14145 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41617 Référence CVE CVE-2023-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2024-32767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-32768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32768 Référence CVE CVE-2024-32769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32769 Référence CVE CVE-2024-32770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-32770 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37041 Référence CVE CVE-2024-37042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0575Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper Networks

d?id=CVE-2020-11984 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11993 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12362 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12400 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12401 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12402 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12403 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13938 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13950 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14145 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1927 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1934 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28469 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28502 Référence CVE CVE-2020-35452 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35452 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36049 Référence CVE CVE-2020-6829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-6829 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-202

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0378Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Junos OS

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Juniper Junos OS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur, une exécution de code arbitraire à distance et un déni de service à distance.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-1015Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2020-13434 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13435 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13529 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13529 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13630 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13631 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13632 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13776 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13777 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13871 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14145 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14422 Référence CVE CVE-2020-15358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15358 Référence CVE CVE-2020-15523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15523 Référence CVE CVE-2020-15778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15778 Référence CVE CVE-2020-15801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15801 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1712 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1751 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0051Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0465 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0466 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0543 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0548 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0549 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11668 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12362 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12363 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12364 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14145 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14556 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14562 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14573 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14577 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14577 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14578 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14579 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14581 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-639Vulnérabilité dans F5 BIG-IP

Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans F5 BIG-IP. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-007328OpenSSH における情報漏えいに関する脆弱性

OpenSSH には、情報漏えいに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Endress+Hauser SSG-E210GC all Firmware versions
Fixed
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Please make sure that only trusted entities have access to the device. Furthermore, you should apply the following General Security Measures when operating the product to mitigate the associated security risk. The collected resources "SICK Operating Guidelines" and "ICS-CERT recommended practices on Industrial Security" could help to implement the general security practices.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 29 Jun 2020 · Last source change 18 Dec 2025, 14:41 UTC · CWE-203 · Observable Discrepancy

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-6303
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SICK PSIRT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SICK PSIRT
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added remediation: sick.com/sca-2025-0011.json; removed remediation: endress.com.
    Before
    remediation: endress.com
    After
    remediation: sick.com/sca-2025-0011.json
    SICK PSIRT ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: Update to V3.1.5 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
  3. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added remediation: sick.com/special_information_sick_operating_guidelines_cybersecurity_by_sick_en_im0106719.pdf; removed remediation: sick.com/psirt.
    Before
    remediation: sick.com/psirt
    After
    remediation: sick.com/special_information_sick_operating_guidelines_cybersecurity_by_sick_en_im0106719.pdf
    SICK PSIRT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2020-14145 · cve.blacktree.nl