Microsoft Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection — Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
Microsoft · Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection
7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days
High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Published severityHigh→Operational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged
Evidence used
No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
EPSS is 1.61% for the current model date.
Compensating controls
Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.
Verification
Confirm that the asset runs Microsoft Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection and falls inside the recorded affected range.
Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Optional official sources
National CERT insights ?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.
Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.
Official European source
ENISA European Vulnerability Database
Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.
1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier
EUVD-2020-12052
No EUVD known-exploited evidence
ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.
EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days
High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Patch available
01
What, why and how
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Defender that leads arbitrary file deletion on the system.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Microsoft Windows Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1163.
What
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Defender that leads arbitrary file deletion on the system.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Microsoft Windows Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1163.
Why
The product specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors.
How
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may gain additional privileges.
What
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows Defender that leads arbitrary file deletion on the system.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system, aka 'Microsoft Windows Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1163.
Why
The product specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors.
How
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may gain additional privileges.
02
Exploit reality and attack path
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
Observed exploitation ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.No confirmed evidence
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
Public PoC / exploit material ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.Reference recorded
A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.
Likely attack path
local access → Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource → gain additional privileges
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource. The product specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors.
CVSS vector ?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-12052Official EUVD mapping
0 linked advisory records.
Official EUVD record ↗Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20200610Security Bulletin 10 Jun 2020
The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Jun 2020, published on 10 June 2020. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-362Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Windows
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-363Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft
s Microsoft . Elles permettent à un
attaquant de provoquer un contournement de la fonctionnalité de
sécurité, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, une élévation
de privilèges, une exécution de code à distance et une usurpation
d'identité.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des
correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Documentation
Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft du 09 juin 2020
https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/fr-FR/security-guidance
Référence CVE CVE-2020-1073
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1073
Référence CVE CVE-2020-1163
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1163
Référence CVE CVE-2020-1170
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1170
Référence CVE CVE-2020-1202
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1202
Référence CVE CVE-2020-1203
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1203
Référence CVE CVE-2020-1219
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1219
Référence CVE CVE-2020-1221
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1221
Référence CVE CVE-2020-1225
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1225
Référence CVE CVE-2020-1226
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1226
Référence CVE CVE-2020-1229
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1229
Référence CVE CVE-2020-1257
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1257
Ré
Official advisory ↗JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-006418複数の Microsoft 製品の Windows Defender における権限を昇格される脆弱性
複数の Microsoft 製品の Windows Defender には、権限を昇格される脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性を「Microsoft Windows Defender の特権の昇格の脆弱性」として公開しています。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2020-1163 とは異なる脆弱性です。
Official advisory ↗JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-006417複数の Microsoft 製品の Windows Defender における権限を昇格される脆弱性
複数の Microsoft 製品の Windows Defender には、権限を昇格される脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性を「Microsoft Windows Defender の特権の昇格の脆弱性」として公開しています。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2020-1170 とは異なる脆弱性です。
Official advisory ↗KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5147MS 6월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고
##### □ 설명
o 공격자가 특수하게 제작된 악성 응용 프로그램을 실행할 경우 발생하는 스푸핑 취약점
o 관련취약점 :
- 스푸핑 취약점(CVE-2020-1328)
o 영향 : 스푸핑
o 중요도 : 중요
o 관련 KB번호
- 4551998, 4552002
##### □ 해결책
o 영향 받는 소프트웨어를 이용하는 경우 마이크로소프트사의 보안 패치 적용
8. Visual Studio 보안 업데이트
##### □ 설명
o 공격자가 특수하게 제작된 악성 응용 프로그램을 실행할 경우, 권한상승을 허용하는 취약점
o 관련취약점 :
- 권한상승 취약점(CVE-2020-1202, CVE-2020-1203, CVE-2020-1257, CVE-2020-1278, CVE-2020-1293)
- 보안 기능 우회(CVE-2020-1343)
o 영향 : 권한상승
o 중요도 : 중요
o 관련 KB번호
- 4562053
##### □ 해결책
o 영향 받는 소프트웨어를 이용하는 경우 마이크로소프트사의 보안 패치 적용
9. SCOM(System Center Operation Manager) 보안 업데이트
##### □ 설명
o 공격자가 특수하게 제작된 악성 응용 프로그램을 실행할 경우 발생하는 권한상승 취약점
o 관련취약점 :
- 권한상승 취약점(CVE-2020-1163, CVE-2020-1170)
o 영향 : 권한상승
o 중요도 : 중요
##### □ 해결책
o 영향 받는 소프트웨어를 이용하는 경우 마이크로소프트사의 보안 패치 적용
10. Azure DevOps Server 보안 업데이트
##### □ 설명
o 공격자가 특수하게 제작된 악성 응용 프로그램을 실행할 경우 발생하는 스푸핑 취약점
o 관련취약점 :
- 스푸핑 취약점(CVE-2020-1327)
o 영향 : 스푸핑
o 중요도 : 중요
##### □ 해결책
o 영향 받는 소프트웨어를 이용하는 경우 마이크로소프트사의 보안 패치 적용
11. ChakraCore 보안 업데이트
##### □ 설명
o 공격자가 특수하게 제작된 악성 응용 프로그램을 실행할 경우, 원격코드를 허용하는 취약점
o 관련취약점 :
- 원격코드실행 취약점(CVE-2020-1073, CVE-2020-1219)
o 영향 : 원격코드실행
o 중요도 : 긴급
##### □ 해결책
o 영향 받는 소프트웨어를 이용하는 경우 마이크로소프트사의 보안 패치 적용
12. Adobe Flash Player
##### □ 설명
o 공격자가 특수하게 제작된 악성 응용 프로그램을 실행할 경우 발생하는 원격코드실행 취약점
o 관련취약점 :
- 원격코드실행 취약점(ADV200010)
o 영향 : 원격코드실행
o 중요도 : 긴급
o 관련 KB번
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Status ?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.