BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2020
CVE-2020-10683High confidence

dom4j before 2.0.3 and 2.1.x before 2.1.3 allows external DTDs and External Entities by default, which might enable XXE attacks

Unknown · Unknown

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 7.27% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcedom4jVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.1.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcedom4jVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.1.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcedom4jVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.1.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcedom4jVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.1.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2020-0492

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

dom4j before 2.0.3 and 2.1.x before 2.1.3 allows external DTDs and External Entities by default, which might enable XXE attacks. However, there is popular external documentation from OWASP showing how to enable the safe, non-default behavior in any application that uses dom4j.

What

dom4j before 2.0.3 and 2.1.x before 2.1.3 allows external DTDs and External Entities by default, which might enable XXE attacks. However, there is popular external documentation from OWASP showing how to enable the safe, non-default behavior in any application that uses dom4j.

Why

The product processes an XML document that can contain XML entities with URIs that resolve to documents outside of the intended sphere of control, causing the product to embed incorrect documents into its output.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

dom4j before 2.0.3 and 2.1.x before 2.1.3 allows external DTDs and External Entities by default, which might enable XXE attacks. However, there is popular external documentation from OWASP showing how to enable the safe, non-default behavior in any application that uses dom4j.

Why

The product processes an XML document that can contain XML entities with URIs that resolve to documents outside of the intended sphere of control, causing the product to embed incorrect documents into its output.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-611 ↗

CWE-611: Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference. The product processes an XML document that can contain XML entities with URIs that resolve to documents outside of the intended sphere of control, causing the product to embed incorrect documents into its output.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-611
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1459Dell Data Protection Advisor: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Data Protection Advisor ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, und um weitere nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0068IBM Business Automation Workflow: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Business Automation Workflow ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder Dateien zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0119Oracle Utilities Applications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Utilities Applications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2022-1912Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform ausnutzen, um Code zur Ausführung zu bringen, Informationen offenzulegen, Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen oder einen Denial of Service zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20200506Security Bulletin 06 May 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 May 2020, published on 6 May 2020. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

Record?id=CVE-2019-0204 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0231 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10099 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11358 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14893 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16869 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20444 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20445 Référence CVE CVE-2019-8331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8331 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10683 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11022 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11023 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11988 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13955 Référence CVE CVE-2020-26555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26555 Référence CVE CVE-2020-26945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26945 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7656 Référence CVE CVE-2020-9480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0556Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2019-16942 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16943 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17267 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17531 Référence CVE CVE-2019-17558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17558 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20330 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10650 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10672 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10673 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10683 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10968 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10969 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11111 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11112 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11113 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11619 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11620 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11620 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0262Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

26 mars 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7145262 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7145265 du 26 mars 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7145265 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7145367 du 27 mars 2024 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7145367 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1000632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000632 Référence CVE CVE-2018-17196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-17196 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1547 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1551 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1563 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10683 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10735 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1968 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25659 Référence CVE CVE-2020-27783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27783 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28493 Référence CVE CVE-2020-36242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36242 Référence CVE CVE-2021-28957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28957 Référence CVE CVE-2021-43818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-943Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

021 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6525260 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 6525554 du 10 décembre 2021 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6525554 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 6525674 du 10 décembre 2021 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6525674 Référence CVE CVE-2019-10172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10172 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14892 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14893 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10672 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10673 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10683 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10968 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10969 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11022 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11023 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11111 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11112 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11113 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-770Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits SAP

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits SAP. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-560Multiples vulnérabilités dans Oracle Systems

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Oracle Systems. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-004997dom4j における XML 外部エンティティの脆弱性

dom4j には、XML 外部エンティティの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
n/a
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2020 · Last source change 4 Aug 2024, 11:06 UTC · CWE-611 · Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-0492
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2020-10683 · cve.blacktree.nl