BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2020
CVE-2020-1040High confidence

Microsoft Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft · Hyper-V RemoteFX

9.0CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch now

CISA confirms exploitation in the wild and lists 2022-05-03 as the remediation due date.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • CISA confirms exploitation in the wild.
  • EPSS is 7.39% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Microsoft Hyper-V RemoteFX and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2020-11934

CISA KEV mirrored by ENISA

A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Recorded by ENISA since 3 Nov 2021. Evidence sources: cisa_kev.
ENISA score
9.0 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch now

CISA confirms exploitation in the wild and lists 2022-05-03 as the remediation due date.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Microsoft Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU contains an improper input validation vulnerability due to the host server failing to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system. Successful exploitation allows for remote code execution on the host operating system.

What

Microsoft Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU contains an improper input validation vulnerability due to the host server failing to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system. Successful exploitation allows for remote code execution on the host operating system.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

Microsoft Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU contains an improper input validation vulnerability due to the host server failing to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system. Successful exploitation allows for remote code execution on the host operating system.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Confirmed in the wild

CISA added this CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue on 2021-11-03.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
the affected interface → Improper Input Validation → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Unspecified
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-20 ↗

CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
Remote code executionCWE-20CISA KEV
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-11934Known-exploited evidence recorded

A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043.

Official EUVD record ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20200715Security Bulletin 15 Jul 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 15 Jul 2020, published on 15 July 2020. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-429Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Windows

multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans Microsoft Windows . Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, un déni de service, une élévation de privilèges et une exécution de code à distance. Solution Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft du 14 juillet 2020 https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/fr-FR/security-guidance Référence CVE CVE-2020-1032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1032 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1036 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1040 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1041 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1042 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1043 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1085 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1249 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1267 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1330 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1333 Ré

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-008161複数の Microsoft Windows 製品におけるリモートでコードを実行される脆弱性

Microsoft Windows Server 2008、Windows Server 2012、Windows Server 2016 には、ホスト サーバー上の Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU が、ゲスト オペレーティング システム上の認証されているユーザーからの入力を適切に検証しない場合、リモートでコードを実行される脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性を「Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU のリモートでコードが実行される脆弱性」として公開しています。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2020-1032、CVE-2020-1036、CVE-2020-1040、CVE-2020-1042、CVE-2020-1043 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-008160複数の Microsoft Windows 製品におけるリモートでコードを実行される脆弱性

Microsoft Windows Server 2008、Windows Server 2012、Windows Server 2016 には、ホスト サーバー上の Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU が、ゲスト オペレーティング システム上の認証されているユーザーからの入力を適切に検証しない場合、リモートでコードを実行される脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性を「Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU のリモートでコードが実行される脆弱性」として公開しています。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2020-1032、CVE-2020-1036、CVE-2020-1041、CVE-2020-1042、CVE-2020-1043 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-008159複数の Microsoft Windows 製品におけるリモートでコードを実行される脆弱性

Microsoft Windows Server 2008、Windows Server 2012、Windows Server 2016 には、ホスト サーバー上の Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU が、ゲスト オペレーティング システム上の認証されているユーザーからの入力を適切に検証しない場合、リモートでコードを実行される脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性を「Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU のリモートでコードが実行される脆弱性」として公開しています。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2020-1032、CVE-2020-1040、CVE-2020-1041、CVE-2020-1042、CVE-2020-1043 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-008158複数の Microsoft Windows 製品におけるリモートでコードを実行される脆弱性

Microsoft Windows Server 2008、Windows Server 2012、Windows Server 2016 には、ホスト サーバー上の Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU が、ゲスト オペレーティング システム上の認証されているユーザーからの入力を適切に検証しない場合、リモートでコードを実行される脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性を「Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU のリモートでコードが実行される脆弱性」として公開しています。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2020-1036、CVE-2020-1040、CVE-2020-1041、CVE-2020-1042、CVE-2020-1043 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-008155複数の Microsoft Windows 製品におけるリモートでコードを実行される脆弱性

Microsoft Windows Server 2008、Windows Server 2012、Windows Server 2016 には、ホスト サーバー上の Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU が、ゲスト オペレーティング システム上の認証されているユーザーからの入力を適切に検証しない場合、リモートでコードを実行される脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性を「Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU のリモートでコードが実行される脆弱性」として公開しています。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2020-1032、CVE-2020-1036、CVE-2020-1040、CVE-2020-1041、CVE-2020-1042 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2020-008154複数の Microsoft Windows 製品におけるリモートでコードを実行される脆弱性

Microsoft Windows Server 2008、Windows Server 2012、Windows Server 2016 には、ホスト サーバー上の Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU が、ゲスト オペレーティング システム上の認証されているユーザーからの入力を適切に検証しない場合、リモートでコードを実行される脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性を「Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU のリモートでコードが実行される脆弱性」として公開しています。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2020-1032、CVE-2020-1036、CVE-2020-1040、CVE-2020-1041、CVE-2020-1043 とは異なる脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5219해킹 공격에 악용되는 취약점 업데이트 권고

#### 해킹 공격에 악용되는 취약점 업데이트 권고 2020.10.22 ##### □ 개요 o 美 국가안보국(NSA), 해커들이 사이버 공격에 악용하는 25개의 취약점 리스트 발표 [1] o 공격자는 해당 취약점을 악용하여 침해사고를 발생시킬 수 있으므로, 기업 담당자 및 해당 시스템을 이용중인 사용자는 최신 버전으로 업데이트 권고 ##### □ 주요 내용 제조사 제품 CVE ID 내용 Microsoft 윈도우즈 CVE-2019-0708 [2] 공격자가 특별하게 조작된 RDP 패킷을 전송하여 피해 시스템에 임의 코드를 실행할 수 있는 취약점 CVE-2020-1040 [3] 공격자가 NTLM MIC(메시지 무결성 검증)을 우회하여 중간자공격(MITM)이 가능한 취약점 CVE-2020-0601 [4] 암호화 인증서를 검증하는 API에서 발생하는 중간자공격(MITM)이 가능한 취약점 CVE-2019-0803 [5] 메모리의 객체 처리가 미흡하여 발생하는 권한상승 취약점 CVE-2020-1472 [6] Netlogon 프로토콜의 취약한 암호화 운영모드 사용으로 발생하는 권한상승 취약점 윈도우 서버 CVE-2020-1350 [7] DNS로 운영되는 Windows 서버에서 요청값에 대한 처리가 미흡하여 발생하는 원격코드실행 취약점 윈도우 Exchange 서버 CVE-2020-0688 [8] 메모리의 객체에 대한 처리가 미흡하여 발생하는 원격코드실행 취약점 Oracle WebLogic Server CVE-2015-4852 [9] 조작된 자바 객체를 역직렬화하여 발생하는 임의코드실행 취약점 Coherence CVE-2020-2555 [10] 조작한 T3 프로토콜의 request를 허용 및 역직렬화하여 발생하는 원격코드실행 취약점 Citrix ADC, Gateway, SDWAN- WANOP CVE-2019-19781 [11] 공격자가 인증을 우회하여 임의코드를 실행할 수 있는 취약점 CVE-2020-8193, 8195,

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5171MS 7월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

CVE-2020-1330, CVE-2020-1351, CVE-2020-1358, CVE-2020-1361, CVE-2020-1367, CVE-2020-1386, CVE-2020-1389, CVE-2020-1391, CVE-2020-1397, CVE-2020-1419, CVE-2020-1420, CVE-2020-1426, CVE-2020-1433, CVE-2020-1462, CVE-2020-1468) o 영향 : 원격코드실행 o 중요도 : 긴급 o 관련 KB번호 - 4558997, 4558998, 4565483, 4565489, 4565503, 4565508, 4565511, 4565513, 4565552, 4565553, 4565554, 4565911, 4565912 ##### □ 해결책 o 영향 받는 소프트웨어를 이용하는 경우 마이크로소프트사의 보안 패치 적용 2. Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2016, Server Core 설치(2019, 2016, v1909, v1903, v1803) 보안 업데이트 ##### □ 설명 o 공격자가 특수하게 제작된 악성 응용 프로그램을 실행할 경우, 원격코드실행을 허용하는 취약점 o 관련취약점 : - 원격코드실행 취약점(CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043, CVE-2020-1350, CVE-2020-1355, CVE-2020-1374, CVE-2020-1400, CVE-2020-1401, CVE-2020-1407, CVE-2020-1408, CVE-2020-1409, CVE-2020-1410, CVE-2020-1412, CVE-2020-1421, CVE-2020-1435, CVE-2020-1436) - 권한상승 취약점(CVE-2020-1085, CVE-2020-1249, CVE-2020-1333, CVE-2020-1336, CVE-2020-1344, CVE-2020-1346, CVE-2020-1347, CVE-2020-1352, CVE-2020-1353, CVE-2020-1354, CVE-2020-1356, CVE-2020-1357, CVE-2020-1359, CVE-2020-1360, CVE-2020-1362, CVE-2020-1363, CVE-2020-1365, CVE-2020-1366, CVE-2020-1368, CVE-2020-1369, CVE-2020-1370, CVE-2020-1371, CVE-2020-1372, CVE-2020-1373, CVE-2020-1375, CVE-2020-1381, CVE-202

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Windows Server: 2016 (Core installation), 2012 (Core installation), 2012 R2, 2012, 2012 R2 (Core installation), 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Core installation), 2016, 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Jul 2020 · Last source change 21 Oct 2025, 23:35 UTC · CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2020-11934
Product sourceCISA KEV
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    2016; 2016 (Core installation); 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1; 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Core installation); 2012; 2012 (Core installation); 2012 R2; 2012 R2 (Core installation) · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    Windows Server: 2016, 2016 (Core installation), 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1, 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Core installation), 2012, 2012 (Core installation), 2012 R2, 2012 R2 (Core installation) · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Added to CISA KEV
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2020-1040 · cve.blacktree.nl