BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2019
CVE-2019-9936High confidence

In SQLite 3.27.2, running fts5 prefix queries inside a transaction could trigger a heap-based buffer over-read in fts5HashEntrySort in sqlite3.c, which may lead to an information leak

Unknown · Unknown

7.5HighCVSS 3.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 4.84% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcesqlite3Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.27.2-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcesqlite3Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.27.2-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcesqlite3Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.27.2-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcesqlite3Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.27.2-2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2019-19291

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In SQLite 3.27.2, running fts5 prefix queries inside a transaction could trigger a heap-based buffer over-read in fts5HashEntrySort in sqlite3.c, which may lead to an information leak. This is related to ext/fts5/fts5_hash.c.

What

In SQLite 3.27.2, running fts5 prefix queries inside a transaction could trigger a heap-based buffer over-read in fts5HashEntrySort in sqlite3.c, which may lead to an information leak. This is related to ext/fts5/fts5_hash.c.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In SQLite 3.27.2, running fts5 prefix queries inside a transaction could trigger a heap-based buffer over-read in fts5HashEntrySort in sqlite3.c, which may lead to an information leak. This is related to ext/fts5/fts5_hash.c.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1614Tenable Security Nessus Network Monitor: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer, authentisierter oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Tenable Security Nessus Network Monitor ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen und Daten zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-1015Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6111 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6488 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7309 Référence CVE CVE-2019-8457 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8457 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9169 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9636 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9674 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9740 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9923 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9936 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9937 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9947 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9948 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10029 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10531 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10543 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10735 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-202

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0499Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Nessus Network Monitor

ecord?id=CVE-2019-19925 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19926 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19956 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19959 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20218 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20388 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20838 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5815 Référence CVE CVE-2019-8457 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8457 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9936 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9937 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11655 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11656 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13434 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13435 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13630 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13631 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-645Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

g/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11478 Référence CVE CVE-2019-11479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11479 Référence CVE CVE-2019-15875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15875 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16168 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5018 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5599 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5610 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6593 Référence CVE CVE-2019-8457 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8457 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9936 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9937 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10188 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1656 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1657 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1660 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1661 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1662 Référence CVE CVE-2020-1665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1665

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-190Multiples vulnérabilités dans Google Android

ERecord?id=CVE-2019-14132 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14134 Référence CVE CVE-2019-14135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14135 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19524 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19532 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19807 Référence CVE CVE-2019-2056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-2056 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5018 Référence CVE CVE-2019-8457 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8457 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9936 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0067 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0068 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0070 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0071 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0072 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0073 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0075 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0076 Ré

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-002763SQLite における境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

SQLite には、境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
n/a
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Mar 2019 · Last source change 4 Aug 2024, 22:01 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2019-19291
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2019-19291 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2019-19291"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: sqlite.org/b3fa58dd7403dbd4; added remediation: sqlite.org/b3fa58dd7403dbd4; removed vendor advisory: lists.fedoraproject.org/EXD2GYJVTDGEQPUNMMMC5TB7MQXOBBMO; removed vendor advisory: lists.fedoraproject.org/N66U5PY5UJU4XBFZJH7QNKIDNAVIB4OP; 3 further removals.
    Before
    vendor advisory: lists.fedoraproject.org/EXD2GYJVTDGEQPUNMMMC5TB7MQXOBBMO · vendor advisory: lists.fedoraproject.org/N66U5PY5UJU4XBFZJH7QNKIDNAVIB4OP · vendor advisory: lists.opensuse.org/msg00026.html · 2 more references
    After
    patch: sqlite.org/b3fa58dd7403dbd4 · remediation: sqlite.org/b3fa58dd7403dbd4
    sqlite.org ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    sqlite.org ↗
  5. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to High.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    High
    NIST NVD ↗
  6. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 7.5 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    7.5 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N)
    NIST NVD ↗
  7. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2019-9936 · cve.blacktree.nl