BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2019
CVE-2019-6133High confidence

In PolicyKit (aka polkit) 0.115, the "start time" protection mechanism can be bypassed because fork() is not atomic, and therefore authorization decisions are improperly cached

Unknown · Unknown

6.7MediumCVSS 3.0
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 4 Aug 2024

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.45% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

13 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 5 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.19.16-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcepolicykit-1Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.0.105-25Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.19.16-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcepolicykit-1Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.0.105-25Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.19.16-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcepolicykit-1Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.0.105-25Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.4.19.16-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcepolicykit-1Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.0.105-25Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2019-15700

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In PolicyKit (aka polkit) 0.115, the "start time" protection mechanism can be bypassed because fork() is not atomic, and therefore authorization decisions are improperly cached. This is related to lack of uid checking in polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c.

What

In PolicyKit (aka polkit) 0.115, the "start time" protection mechanism can be bypassed because fork() is not atomic, and therefore authorization decisions are improperly cached. This is related to lack of uid checking in polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In PolicyKit (aka polkit) 0.115, the "start time" protection mechanism can be bypassed because fork() is not atomic, and therefore authorization decisions are improperly cached. This is related to lack of uid checking in polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-267Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Junos Space

cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20907 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3820 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3840 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3890 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3901 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5010 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5094 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5188 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5953 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6133 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6690 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6778 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7149 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7150 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7572 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7573 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7574 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7575 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2021-AVI-120Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

-su-20210437-1/ Bulletin de sécurité le noyau Linux de SUSE suse-su-20210438-1 du 11 février 2021 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2021/suse-su-20210438-1/ Bulletin de sécurité le noyau Linux de SUSE suse-su-20210452-1 du 11 février 2021 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2021/suse-su-20210452-1/ Référence CVE CVE-2018-10902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-10902 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19063 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20806 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20934 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6133 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0444 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0465 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0466 Référence CVE CVE-2020-10781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10781 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11668 Référence CVE CVE-2020-15436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15436 Référence CVE CVE-2020-15437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15437 Référence CVE CVE-2020-25211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-202

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-776Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ww.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2020/suse-su-20203507-1/ Bulletin de sécurité SUSE suse-su-20203512-1 du 25 novembre 2020 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2020/suse-su-20203512-1/ Bulletin de sécurité SUSE suse-su-20203513-1 du 25 novembre 2020 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2020/suse-su-20203513-1/ Bulletin de sécurité SUSE suse-su-20203522-1 du 25 novembre 2020 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2020/suse-su-20203522-1/ Référence CVE CVE-2017-18204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18204 Référence CVE CVE-2019-19063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19063 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6133 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0404 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0427 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0430 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0431 Référence CVE CVE-2020-0432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0432 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12351 Référence CVE CVE-2020-12352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12352 Référence CVE CVE-2020-14351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-325Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper

cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-15505 Référence CVE CVE-2018-1729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1729 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0046 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0048 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0049 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0052 Référence CVE CVE-2019-0053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0053 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1559 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5739 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6133 Gestion détaillée du document le 11 juillet 2019 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-115Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service et une élévation de privilèges.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-098Vulnérabilité dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-091Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un contournement de la politique de sécurité, une atteinte à l'intégrité des données et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-001534PolicyKit における競合状態に関する脆弱性

PolicyKit (別名 polkit) には、競合状態に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
n/a
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 11 Jan 2019 · Last source change 4 Aug 2024, 20:16 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2019-15700
Product sourceUnavailable
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2019-15700 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2019-15700"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: git.kernel.org/7b55851367136b1efd84d98fea81ba57a98304cf; added patch: gitlab.freedesktop.org/19; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:0230; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:0420; 2 further additions; 14 further removals.
    Before
    vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:0230 · vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:0420 · vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:0832 · 13 more references
    After
    patch: git.kernel.org/7b55851367136b1efd84d98fea81ba57a98304cf · patch: gitlab.freedesktop.org/19 · patch: gitlab.freedesktop.org/c898fdf4b1aafaa04f8ada9d73d77c8bb76e2f81 · 1 more references
    gitlab.freedesktop.org ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    gitlab.freedesktop.org ↗
  5. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to Medium.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    Medium
    NIST NVD ↗
  6. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 6.7 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    6.7 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  7. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2019-6133 · cve.blacktree.nl