BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2019
CVE-2019-6111High confidence

However, the scp client only performs cursory validation of the object name returned (only directory traversal attacks are prevented)

Unknown · Unknown

5.9MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 18 Dec 2025

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 58.20% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

8 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainopensshVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.7.9_p1-r3Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainopensshVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.7.9_p1-r3Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainopensshVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.7.9_p1-r3Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:7.9p1-9Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:7.9p1-9Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:7.9p1-9Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:7.9p1-9Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archiveopenssh-ssh1Under evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-412672 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalSiemens ProductCERTSSA-412672: Multiple OpenSSL and OpenSSH Vulnerabilities in SCALANCE X-200RNA Switch Devices before V3.2.7
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SCALANCE X204RNA (HSR) (6GK5204-0BA00-2MB2)
  • SCALANCE X204RNA (PRP) (6GK5204-0BA00-2KB2)
  • SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (HSR) (6GK5204-0BS00-2NA3)
  • SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP) (6GK5204-0BS00-3LA3)
  • SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP/HSR) (6GK5204-0BS00-3PA3)
Summary
An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to the scp implementation being derived from 1983 rcp, the server chooses which files/directories are sent to the client. However, the scp client only performs cursory validation of the object name returned (only directory traversal attacks are prevented). A malicious scp server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can overwrite arbitrary files in the scp client target directory. If recursive operation (-r) is performed, the server can manipulate subdirectories as well (for example, to overwrite the .ssh/authorized_keys file).
Remediation
Update to V3.2.7 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2019-15678

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to the scp implementation being derived from 1983 rcp, the server chooses which files/directories are sent to the client. However, the scp client only performs cursory validation of the object name returned (only directory traversal attacks are prevented). A malicious scp server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can overwrite arbitrary files in the scp client target directory. If recursive operation (-r) is performed, the server can manipulate subdirectories as well (for example, to overwrite the .ssh/authorized_keys file).

What

An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to the scp implementation being derived from 1983 rcp, the server chooses which files/directories are sent to the client. However, the scp client only performs cursory validation of the object name returned (only directory traversal attacks are prevented). A malicious scp server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can overwrite arbitrary files in the scp client target directory. If recursive operation (-r) is performed, the server can manipulate subdirectories as well (for example, to overwrite the .ssh/authorized_keys file).

Why

Attacker-controlled path data is not constrained to the intended directory before the application accesses a file.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to the scp implementation being derived from 1983 rcp, the server chooses which files/directories are sent to the client. However, the scp client only performs cursory validation of the object name returned (only directory traversal attacks are prevented). A malicious scp server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can overwrite arbitrary files in the scp client target directory. If recursive operation (-r) is performed, the server can manipulate subdirectories as well (for example, to overwrite the .ssh/authorized_keys file).

Why

Attacker-controlled path data is not constrained to the intended directory before the application accesses a file.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-22 ↗

CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'). The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-22Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1082Juniper JUNOS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Juniper JUNOS im Zusammenhang mit OpenSSH ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, beliebigen Code auszuführen oder Dateien zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0561Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Verfügbarkeit und Integrität des Systems zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-1995SCP in mehreren Produkten: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in der SCP Komponente mehrerer Produkte ausnutzen um Daten offenzulegen und zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0378Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Junos OS

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Juniper Junos OS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur, une exécution de code arbitraire à distance et un déni de service à distance.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-1015Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5094 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5188 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5435 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5436 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5443 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5481 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5482 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6109 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6110 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6111 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6488 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7309 Référence CVE CVE-2019-8457 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-8457 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9169 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9636 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9674 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9740 Référence CVE CVE-2019-9923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9923 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-1094Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

g/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20685 Référence CVE CVE-2018-25032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-25032 Référence CVE CVE-2018-4842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-4842 Référence CVE CVE-2018-4848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-4848 Référence CVE CVE-2019-13924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13924 Référence CVE CVE-2019-1552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1552 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16905 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6109 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6110 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6111 Référence CVE CVE-2020-28388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28388 Référence CVE CVE-2020-7580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-7580 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40365 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44693 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44694 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44694 Référence CVE CVE-2021-44695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44695 Référence CVE CVE-2022-30065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30065 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2020-AVI-197Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Palo Alto

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Palo Alto. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-179Vulnérabilité dans OpenSSH

Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans OpenSSH. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-001828NetKit における脆弱性

NetKit には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-6111 と同様の脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-016205MIT krb5-appl における不正な認証に関する脆弱性

MIT krb5-appl には、不正な認証に関する脆弱性が存在します。 本脆弱性は、CVE-2019-6111 および CVE-2019-7283 と同様の脆弱性です。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-001830OpenSSH におけるパストラバーサルの脆弱性

OpenSSH には、パストラバーサルの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Update to V3.2.7 or later version
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 31 Jan 2019 · Last source change 18 Dec 2025, 14:35 UTC · CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2019-15678
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2019-15678 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2019-15678"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added patch: oracle.com/cpuoct2019-5072832.html; added remediation: oracle.com/cpuoct2019-5072832.html; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:3702; removed vendor advisory: debian.org/dsa-4387; 6 further removals.
    Before
    vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:3702 · vendor advisory: debian.org/dsa-4387 · vendor advisory: freebsd.org/FreeBSD-EN-19:10.scp.asc · 5 more references
    After
    patch: oracle.com/cpuoct2019-5072832.html · remediation: oracle.com/cpuoct2019-5072832.html
    oracle.com ↗
  3. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    CNA ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    oracle.com ↗
  5. Public exploit evidencePublic exploit evidence changed from Public exploit reference to Public exploit reference.
    Before
    Public exploit reference
    After
    Public exploit reference
    bugzilla.redhat.com ↗
  6. CVSS scoreCVSS scoring authority changed from CISA ADP to NIST NVD; the displayed base score remained 5.9.
    Before
    5.9 (CVSS 3.1 · CISA ADP · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N)
    After
    5.9 (CVSS 3.1 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N)
    NIST NVD ↗
  7. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
  8. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: Update to V3.2.7 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2019-6111 · cve.blacktree.nl