BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2019
CVE-2019-5953High confidence

Buffer overflow in GNU Wget 1.20.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) or may execute an arbitrary code via unspecified vectors

The GNU Projec · GNU Wget

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.0
Recommended action
Within 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 5.86% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs The GNU Projec GNU Wget and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainwgetVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.20.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainwgetVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.20.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainwgetVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.1.20.3-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcewgetVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.20.1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcewgetVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.20.1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcewgetVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.20.1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcewgetVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.20.1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2019-15521

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

Buffer overflow in GNU Wget 1.20.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) or may execute an arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

What

Buffer overflow in GNU Wget 1.20.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) or may execute an arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

Buffer overflow in GNU Wget 1.20.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) or may execute an arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Out-of-bounds Write → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787 ↗

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
NetworkUnauthenticatedRemote code executionCWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2022-AVI-267Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Junos Space

e.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20811 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20907 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3820 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3840 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3890 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3901 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5010 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5094 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5188 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5953 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6133 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6690 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6778 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7149 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7150 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7572 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7573 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7574 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2019-AVI-299Multiples vulnérabilités dans IBM QRadar

e.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-14646 Référence CVE CVE-2018-17972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-17972 Référence CVE CVE-2018-5344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-5344 Référence CVE CVE-2018-7740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-7740 Référence CVE CVE-2018-9568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9568 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3855 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3856 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3857 Référence CVE CVE-2019-3863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-3863 Référence CVE CVE-2019-5953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-5953 Référence CVE CVE-2019-6974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6974 Référence CVE CVE-2019-7221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7221 Gestion détaillée du document le 28 juin 2019 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2019-000022GNU Wget におけるバッファオーバーフローの脆弱性

The GNU Project が提供する GNU Wget には、バッファオーバーフロー (CWE-119) の脆弱性が存在します。 この脆弱性情報は、情報セキュリティ早期警戒パートナーシップに基づき下記の方が IPA に報告し、JPCERT/CC が開発者との調整を行いました。 報告者: 草野 一彦 氏

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
GNU Wget: 1.20.1 and earlier
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 17 May 2019 · Last source change 4 Aug 2024, 20:09 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-01
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2019-15521
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2019-15521 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2019-15521"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:2979; removed vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:3168; 1 further removals.
    Before
    vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:2979 · vendor advisory: access.redhat.com/RHSA-2019:3168 · vendor advisory: security.gentoo.org/201908-19
    After
    no authoritative guidance recorded
    CNA ↗
  3. SeveritySeverity changed from Unknown to Critical.
    Before
    Unknown
    After
    Critical
    NIST NVD ↗
  4. CVSS scoreCVSS score changed from not recorded to 9.8 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    9.8 (CVSS 3.0 · NIST NVD · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)
    NIST NVD ↗
  5. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2019-5953 · cve.blacktree.nl